The use of endoprosthesis implants is frequent for tumours involving the proximal third of the femur and not amenable to primary arthroplasty or internal fixation. In this population, these implants are preferentially cemented given poor bone quality associated with systemic diseases and treatments. Loosening is a common complication of these implants that have been linked to poor bone quality, type of implants and importantly cementing technique. Thus, these techniques vary between different surgeons and based mainly on previous experience. One of the most successful cementing techniques in the arthroplasty literature is the French paradox. This technique involves removing the cancellous bone of the proximal femoral metaphysis and selects the largest stem to tightly fit the created cavity delineated by cortical bone. Cementing the implant results in a very thin cement layer that fills the inconsistent gaps between the metal and the bone. To our knowledge, no previous report exists in the literature assessing loosening in proximal femur replacement using the French paradox cementing technique. In this study, we sought to examine (1) rates of loosening in proximal femur replacement, and (2) the oncological outcomes including tumour recurrence and implant related complications.

A retrospective study of 42 patients underwent proximal femur replacement between 1990 and 2018 at our institution. Of these, 30 patients met our inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers have evaluated the preoperative and the most recent postoperative radiographs using the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS) radiographic scoring system and Gruen classification for femoral stem loosening. Additionally, the acetabulum was evaluated for erosion according to the criteria of Baker et al. The mean age of this cohort was 60.5 (19–80), with 60% being males. The primary origin was metastatic in 17 (56.7%) patients, bone sarcoma in 10 (33.3%) patients and soft tissue sarcoma in 3 (10%) patients. Pathological fractures were present in 11 (36.7%) patients. Seven (23.3%) patients had prior intramedullary nailing. Preoperative radiotherapy was used in 8 (26.7%) and postoperative radiotherapy in 17 (56.7%) patients. The mean clinical follow-up was 25.2±26.3 months and the mean radiographical follow-up was 24.8±26 months.

The mean ISOLS score for both reviewers was found to be 89±6.5% and 86.5±6.1%, respectively. Additionally, the first reviewer found two patients to be possibly loos (6.7%) compared to one (3.3%) patient for the second reviewer. No components scored as probably or definitely loose and non-required revision for either loosening or metal failure. Furthermore, both reviewers showed no acetabular erosion in 25 (83.3%) and 24 (80%) patients, respectively. On the other hand, the overall rate of complications was 36.6% with 11 complications reported in 30 patients. Local recurrence occurred in five (16.6%) patients. Prosthetic Dislocation was the most frequent complications with eight dislocations in four patients.

Despite complications, our results showed no radiographic evidence of stem loosening. Cementing proximal femur prosthesis with a tight canal fit and with a thin cement mantle appears to be a viable option at short and medium term.

The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the difference in post-operative complication rates between Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and conventional techniques in spine surgery. Several studies have shown that the accuracy of pedicle screw placement significantly improves with use of CAS. Yet, few studies have compared the incidence of post-operative complications between CAS and conventional techniques.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to identify patients that underwent posterior lumbar fusion from 2011 to 2013. Multivariate analysis was conducted to demonstrate the difference in post-operative complication rates between CAS and conventional techniques in spine surgery.

Out of 15,222 patients, 14,382 (95.1%) were operated with conventional techniques and 740 (4.90%) were operated with CAS. Multivariate analysis showed that patients in the CAS group had less odds to experience adverse events post-operatively (OR 0.57, P <0.001).

This paper examined the complications in lumbar spinal surgery with or without the use of CAS. These results suggest that CAS may provide a safer technique for implant placement in lumbar fusion surgeries.

Cervical spine fusion have gained interest in the literature since these procedures are now ever more frequently being performed in an outpatient setting with few complications and acceptable results. The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of blood transfusion after cervical fusion surgery, and its effect, if any on complication rates.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to identify patients that underwent cervical fusion surgery from 2010 to 2013. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used to determine post-operative complications associated with transfusion and cervical fusion.

We identified 11,588 patients who had cervical spine fusion between 2010 and 2013. The overall rate of transfusion was found to be 1.47%. All transfused patients were found to have increased risk of: venous thromboembolism (TBE) (OR 3.19, CI: 1.16–8.77), myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 9.12, CI: 2.53–32.8), increased length of stay (LOS) (OR 28.03, CI: 14.28–55.01) and mortality (OR 4.14, CI: 1.44–11.93). Single level fusion had increased risk of: TBE (OR 3.37, CI: 1.01–11.33), MI (OR 10.5, CI: 1.88–59.89), and LOS (OR 14.79, CI: 8.2–26.67). Multilevel fusion had increased risk of: TBE (OR 5.64, CI: 1.15–27.6), surgical site infection (OR 16.29, CI: 3.34–79.49), MI (OR 10.84, CI: 2.01–58.55), LOS (OR 26.56, CI: 11.8–59.78) and mortality (OR 10.24, CI: 2.45–42.71). ACDF surgery had an increased risk of: TBE (OR 4.87, CI: 1.04–22.82), surgical site infection (OR 9.73, CI: 2.14–44.1), MI (OR 9.88, CI: 1.87–52.2), LOS (OR 28.34, CI: 13.79–58.21) and mortality (OR 6.3, CI: 1.76–22.48). Posterior fusion surgery had increased risk of: MI (OR 10.45, CI: 1.42–77.12) and LOS (OR 4.42, CI: 2.68–7.29).

Our results demonstrate that although cervical fusions can be done as outpatient procedures special precautions and investigations should be done for patients who receive transfusion after cervical fusion surgery. These patients are demonstrated to have higher rate of MI, DVT, wound infection and mortality when compared to those who do not receive transfusion.

Hemorrhage and transfusion requirements in spine surgery are common. This is especially true for thoracic and lumbar fusion surgeries. The purpose of this papersi to determine predictive factors for transfusion and their effect on short-term post-operative outcomes for thoracic and lumbar fusions.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to identify patients that underwent lumbar or thoracic fusion surgery from 2010 to 2013. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used to determine predictive factors and post-operative complications associated with transfusion.

A total of 14,249 patients were included in this study; 13,586 had lumbar fusion and 663 had thoracic fusion surgery. The prevalence of transfusion was 35% for thoracic fusion and 17.5% for lumbar fusion. The multivariate analysis showed that age between 50–60 (OR 1.38, CI: 1.23–1.54), age between 61–70 (OR 1.65, CI: 1.40–1.95), dyspnea (OR 1.11, CI: 1.02–1.23), hypertension (OR 1.14, CI: 1.02–1.27), ASA class (OR 1.73, 1.18–1.45), pre-operative blood transfusion (OR 1.91, CI: 1.04–3.49), and extended surgical time (OR 4.51, CI: 4.09–4.98) were predictors of blood transfusion requirements for lumbar fusion. While only pre-operative BUN (OR 1.04, CI: 1.01–1.06) and extended surgical time (OR 4.70, CI: 3.12–6.96) were predictors of transfusion for thoracic fusion. In contrast, higher pre-operative hematocrit was protective against transfusion. Patients transfused who underwent lumbar fusion had an increased risk to develop superficial wound infection, deep wound infection, venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction and had longer length of hospital stay. Patients transfused who underwent thoracic fusion were more likely to have venous thromboembolism and extended length of hospital stay. However, mortality was not associated with blood transfusion.

This study used a large database to characterise the incidence, predictors and post-operative complications associated with blood transfusion in thoracic and lumbar fusion surgeries. Pre- and post-operative planning for patients deemed to be at high-risk of requiring blood transfusion should be considered to reduce post-operative complication in this population.

Bone metastases are the most common cause of cancer-related pain and often lead to other complications such as pathological fractures and spinal cord compression. Bisphosphonates (BP) are a class of potent anti-resorptive agents commonly prescribed to retard osteoporosis progression. Interestingly, BP may have indirect anti-tumour properties through negative effects on macrophages, osteoclasts, endothelial cells and their ability to suppress matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity. Currently, the use of bisphosphonates for cancer therapy is generally restricted to high dose systemic delivery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of direct local delivery of Zoledronate at the metastatic site in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis to bone.

Seven days following intra-tibial inoculation with MDA-MB-231 (N = 1× 105) breast cancer cells in athymic mice, the experimental group (N = 11) was treated by direct infusion of 2µg of Zoledronate into the tibial lesion (three times/week for three weeks) and compared to vehicle-treated mice (N = 5). The formation of bone metastases and growth of the lesions were followed up by weekly bioluminescence imaging. In a subsequent experiment, a comparison of the effects of local versus systemic delivery of Zoledronate on the formation of osteolytic bone metastases was carried in athymic mice (N = 15). Seven days following intra-tibial inoculation with MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells, the systemic group (N = 5) was treated with Zoledronate (0.025mg/kg) once per week for four weeks and compared to systemic delivery of vehicle (N = 4). Following treatment, the mice were sacrificed, and micro-CT images of the right tibia were obtained. Bone volume to tissue volume ratio (BV/TV%) was determined using µ-CT biomarkers.

The first experiment showed a statistically significant increase in mean bone volume/tissue volume ratio% (BV/TV%) in the treated group (7.0±1.54%) as compared to the control group (3.8±0.48%) (P <0.001, 95%CI=1.9–4.3). This corresponded to a net increase of 84.21% in response to Zoledronate treatment. Comparison between the local and systemic effects of Zoledronate also revealed a significant increase in the BV/TV% in the locally treated group (6.69±0.62%) when compared to the cohort administered systemic bisphosphonate treatment (4.03±0.44%) (P<0.001, 95%CI=1.24–3.20), corresponding to a net increase of 66.0%.

These preliminary results suggest that high dose sustained release of Zoledronate can lead to a significant inhibition of tumor-induced osteolysis. Moreover, comparison between local and systemic delivery revealed that the effect of local bisphosphonate administration exceeds the benefits of systemic delivery in terms of osteolysis inhibition. Lastly, the noted effects of Zoledronate local delivery triggers the need for further assessment of its anti-tumour activity.

Wound complications are common in patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) treated with surgical excision. Limited data is available on predictive factors for wound complications beyond the relationship to neo-adjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy. Likewise, the association between blood transfusion, patient comorbidities and post-operative outcomes is not well described. In the present study we identified the predictive factors for blood transfusion and wound complications in patients undergoing surgical resection of soft tissue sarcoma from a national cohort.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to identify patients who underwent surgical resection of a STS from 2005 to 2013. Primary malignant soft tissue neoplasms were identified using the following ICD-9 codes: 171.2, 171.3 and 171.6. Patients treated with both wide excision and amputation were identified using the current procedural terminology (CPT) codes. Prolonged operative time was defined as greater than 90th percentile of time required per procedure. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify associations between patient factors and post-operative wound complications (superficial and deep surgical site infections (SSI), and wound dehiscence). A similar regression model sought to identify prognostic factors for blood transfusion and associations with post-operative outcomes.

A total of 788 patients met our inclusion criteria. Of theses, 64.2% had tumours in the lower limb, 23.1% patients had tumours in the upper limb, and 12.7% patients had pelvic tumours. Six hundred and forty patients (81.2%) underwent surgical excision; 148 (18.8%) patients had an amputation. Multivariable logistic regression modeling identified American Society of Anaesthesiologist (ASA) class 3 and 4 (OR=2.3, P=0.03; OR=8.3, P=0.001, respectively), amputation (OR=14.0, P<0.001) and prolonged operative time (OR=4.6, P<0.001) as significant predictors of blood transfusion. Radiotherapy (OR=2.6, P=0.01) and amputation (OR=2.6, P=0.01) were identified as predictors of superficial SSI, whereas ASA class 4 (OR=6.2, P=0.03), prolonged operative time (OR=3.9, P=0.012) and return to the operating room (OR=10.5, P<0.001) were associated with deep SSI. Male gender (OR=1.8, P=0.03), diabetes (OR=2.3, P=0.03), ASA class 3 (OR=2.4, P=0.003), amputation (OR=3.8, P<0.001) and steroids (OR=4.5, P=0.03) were identified as predictors for wound dehiscence and open SSI.

A national cohort demonstrates that male gender, diabetes, chronic steroid use, higher ASA score and radiotherapy are associated with an increased incidence of wound complications. One in twenty-three patients undergoing resection of an STS will require a blood transfusion, and this risk is correlated with amputation, prolonged operative time and increased ASA score. Strategies to decrease the risk of blood transfusion and wound complication should be considered for these patient groups.

Computer assisted surgery (CAS) has gained popularity in orthopaedics for both total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the past decades as a stereotactic device that provides the surgeon with real-time feedback on implant position based on electromagnetic or infrared based instruments. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of CAS on 30-day complication rates following THA and TKA.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was used to identify all patients that underwent THA and TKA from 2011 to 2013, as well as any complication they had within 30-days of their surgery. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis was used to compare the post-operative complications in patients whose surgery involved the use of CAS with those by conventional surgical techniques.

We identified 104,550 patients who had THA (42,275 patients) and TKA (62,275 patients) procedures in the database between 2011 and 2013. Computer Assisted Surgery was used in 1,120 THA and 2,173 TKA procedures. There were higher overall adverse events (OR 1.40, CI: 1.22–1.59) in the Conventional group when compared to CAS for TKA. The rate of overall minor events (OR 1.38, CI: 1.21–1.58) and requirements for blood transfusion (OR 1.44, CI: 1.25–1.67) were higher in the Conventional group compared to the CAS group for TKA. However, rate of re-operation was significantly higher in the CAS group for TKA (OR 1.60, CI: 1.15–2.25). The results also showed higher overall adverse events (OR 2.61, CI: 2.09–3.26) in the Conventional group when compared to CAS for THA. The rate of overall minor events (OR 2.72, CI: 2.16–3.42) and requirements for blood transfusion (OR 3.27, CI: 2.52–4.25) was higher in the Conventional group whereas superficial wound infections (OR 0.46, CI: 0.46–0.81) were shown to be higher in the CAS group. The result also showed slightly longer operative times in CAS for both THA and TKA.

This study analysed a large patient database involving multiple institutions and surgeons and found that, overall, the use off CAS in primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty reduced the number of adverse events in the first 30-days postoperatively, compared to conventional surgical techniques. However, CAS was associated with an increased number of reoperations, superficial infections and operating time. The clinical benefits and disadvantages of CAS should be considered by arthroplasty surgeons when determining the potential benefit-cost ratio of this technology.