No previous studies have examined the physical characteristics of patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES). We compared the anthropometric features of patients who developed CES after a disc prolapse with those who did not but who had symptoms that required elective surgery. We recorded the age, gender, height, weight and body mass index (BMI) of 92 consecutive patients who underwent elective lumbar discectomy and 40 consecutive patients who underwent discectomy for CES. On univariate analysis, the mean BMI of the elective discectomy cohort (26.5 kg/m² (16.6 to 41.7) was very similar to that of the age-matched national mean (27.6 kg/m², p = 1.0). However, the mean BMI of the CES cohort (31.1 kg/m² (21.0 to 54.9)) was significantly higher than both that of the elective group (p < 0.001) and the age-matched national mean (p < 0.001). A similar pattern was seen with the weight of the groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, adjusted for age, gender, height, weight and BMI. Increasing BMI and weight were strongly associated with an increased risk of CES (odds ratio (OR) 1.17, p < 0.001; and OR 1.06, p <  0.001, respectively). However, increasing height was linked with a reduced risk of CES (OR 0.9, p < 0.01). The odds of developing CES were 3.7 times higher (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 7.8, p = 0.016) in the overweight and obese (as defined by the World Health Organization: BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) than in those of ideal weight. Those with very large discs (obstructing > 75% of the spinal canal) had a larger BMI than those with small discs (obstructing < 25% of the canal; p < 0.01). We therefore conclude that increasing BMI is associated with CES.

Objective: To evaluate the use of standard outcome measures in assessing individuals attending a functional restoration programme with chronic back pain.

Design: Prospective collection of data from standard outcome measures used to assess patients attending a functional restoration programme. Data was collected before the start of the programme and six weeks, six months and one year after completion of the programme.

Subjects: There were 69 individuals (33 males and 36 females) with an average age of 41 years, who attended the programme from February 1999 to February 2001.

Outcome measures: Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form 36 (SF36), the Distress Risk Assessment Measures (MSP and MZDI)

Results: During the follow-up period, outcome scores showed only modest improvement compared to pre-programme scores. This was not necessarily reflected in the clinical and functional progress of patients.

Conclusions: Standard outcome measure may not necessarily reflect patient response to rehabilitation programmes.

We studied 32 patients with central cord syndrome who were managed conservatively. Six were under 50 years of age (group 1), 16 between 50 and 70 years (group 2) and ten over 70 years (group 3).

At the time of discharge all patients in group 1 could walk independently and had good bladder control compared with 11 (69%) and 14 (88%) in group 2 and four (40%) and two (20%) in group 3, respectively.

At follow-up after a mean of 8.6 years (4 to 15), ten patients had died leaving 22 in the study. All those in group 1 were alive, could walk independently and had bladder control. In group 2, 13 were alive of whom ten (77%) could walk independently and nine (69%) had bladder control. In group 3 only three were alive of whom only one was independent and none had bladder control.

Function at discharge as measured by the ASIA motor scoring system was usually maintained or improved at follow-up, but patients over 70 years of age at injury did poorly.