In multilevel posterior cervical instrumented fusions, extending the fusion across the cervico-thoracic junction at T1 or T2 (CTJ) has been associated with decreased rate of re-operation and pseudarthrosis but with longer surgical time and increased blood loss. The impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs) remains unclear. The primary objective was to determine whether extending the fusion through the CTJ influenced PROs at 3 and 12 months after surgery. Secondary objectives were to compare the number of patients reaching the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for the PROs and mJOA, operative time duration, intra-operative blood loss (IOBL), length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, adverse events (AEs), re-operation within 12 months of the surgery, and patient satisfaction. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a multicenter observational cohort study of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy. Patients who underwent a posterior instrumented fusion of 4 levels of greater (between C2-T2) between January 2015 and October 2020 with 12 months follow-up were included. PROS (NDI, EQ5D, SF-12 PCS and MCS, NRS arm and neck pain) and mJOA were compared using ANCOVA, adjusted for baseline differences. Patient demographics, comorbidities and surgical details were abstracted. Percentafe of patient reaching MCID for these outcomes was compared using chi-square test. Operative duration, IOBL, AEs, re-operation, discharge disposittion, LOS and satisfaction were compared using chi-square test for categorical variables and independent samples t-tests for continuous variables. A total of 206 patients were included in this study (105 patients not crossing the CTJ and 101 crossing the CTJ). Patients who underwent a construct extending through the CTJ were more likely to be female and had worse baseline EQ5D and NDI scores (p> 0.05). When adjusted for baseline difference, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups for the PROs and mJOA at 3 and 12 months. Surgical duration was longer (p 0.05). Satisfaction with the surgery was high in both groups but significantly different at 12 months (80% versus 72%, p= 0.042 for the group not crossing the CTJ and the group crossing the CTJ, respectively). The percentage of patients reaching MCID for the NDI score was 55% in the non-crossing group versus 69% in the group extending through the CTJ (p= 0.06). Up to 12 months after the surgery, there was no statistically significant differences in PROs between posterior construct extended to or not extended to the upper thoracic spine. The adverse event profile did not differ significantly, but longer surgical time and blood loss were associated with construct extending across the CTJ.
Prolonged length of stay (LOS) is a significant contributor to the variation in surgical health care costs and resource utilization after elective spine surgery. The primary goal of this study was to identify patient, surgical and institutional variables that influence LOS. The secondary objective is to examine variability in institutional practices among participating centers. This is a retrospective study of a prospectively multicentric followed cohort of patients enrolled in the CSORN between January 2015 and October 2020. A logistic regression model and bootstrapping method was used. A survey was sent to participating centers to assessed institutional level interventions in place to decrease LOS. Centers with LOS shorter than the median were compared to centers with LOS longer than the median. A total of 3734 patients were included (979 discectomies, 1102 laminectomies, 1653 fusions). The median LOS for discectomy, laminectomy and fusion were respectively 0.0 day (IQR 1.0), 1.0 day (IQR 2.0) and 4.0 days (IQR 2.0). Laminectomy group had the largest variability (SD=4.4, Range 0-133 days). For discectomy, predictors of LOS longer than 0 days were having less leg pain, higher ODI, symptoms duration over 2 years, open procedure, and AE (p< 0.05). Predictors of longer LOS than median of 1 day for laminectomy were increasing age, living alone, higher ODI, open procedures, longer operative time, and AEs (p< 0.05). For posterior instrumented fusion, predictors of longer LOS than median of 4 days were older age, living alone, more comorbidities, less back pain, higher ODI, using narcotics, longer operative time, open procedures, and AEs (p< 0.05). Ten centers (53%) had either ERAS or a standardized protocol aimed at reducing LOS. In this study stratifying individual patient and institutional level factors across Canada, several independent predictors were identified to enhance the understanding of LOS variability in common elective lumbar spine surgery. The current study provides an updated detailed analysis of the ongoing Canadian efforts in the implementation of multimodal ERAS care pathways. Future studies should explore multivariate analysis in institutional factors and the influence of preoperative patient education on LOS.
Vitamin D is vital for bone health because it assists in the absorption and utilisation of calcium. Vitamin D deficiency may predispose individuals to developing osteoporosis and subsequent osteoporotic fracture. There are various studies in elderly females with hip fractures correlating the low bone mineral density (BMD) with vitamin D levels. But very few studies have evaluated the influence on elderly males. Therefore this study was conducted. All male patients aged more than 50 years presenting to orthopaedic department, in JIPMER, Puducherry, with either fracture neck of femur or intertrochanteric fracture were included. Serum vitamin D level was assessed in them and BMD of both the hips was evaluated by DEXA scan. The vitamin D levels, T-scores, Z-scores were then analysed and correlated. Of the total 41 patients evaluated 21 (51%) had fracture neck of the femur and 20 (49%) patients had intertrochanteric fractures. We found that 11 (26.8%) patients had osteoporosis, 17 (41.5%) had osteopenia, and 13 (31.7%) had normal values. The mean value of total T-scores on fracture side was −1.55 and on no fracture side was −1.88. Among them 9 (22%) patients had vitamin D level <20 ng /mL, 15 (36%) had levels between 20ng–30ng/mL and 17 (41%) had >30ng/mL. Total T-score and Z-score on fracture side and no fracture side showed no correlation with vitamin D (p value >0.05) in these patients. We found significant osteoporosis in both neck and trochanteric regions on both fracture and no fracture sides, yet we had some patients with trochanteric fracture and some with neck fracture on only one side. In view of this other factors like mode of injury, velocity of injury, muscle wasting might have contributed significantly to the type of fracture and side involved. The BMD was found to be lower in patients with neck of femur fracture compared to intertrochanteric fracture, but no correlation was found between vitamin D and BMD scores at neck and trochanteric region. From this study it appears that there is no direct relationship between the vitamin D level and BMD in elderly males with hip fractures. It may emphasise that in male patients with hip fractures vitamin D may not have critical role in development of osteoporosis. The treatment of such patients with vitamin D supplements to prevent hip fractures is still debatable. However further studies in very large groups and controls may bring more light on this subject.