Previous clinical studies have shown the efficacy of a foreign body-induced membrane combined with bone autograft for the reconstruction of traumatologic or pathologic large bone defects or, bone non union. This membrane, rich in mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), avoids bone autograft resorption and promotes consolidation by revascularisation of the bone and secretion of growth factors. Reconstruction requires two different surgical stages: firstly, insertion of a cement spacer in the defect, and secondly, removal of the spacer, preservation of the foreign body-induced membrane and filling of the cavity by bone autograft. The optimal time to perform the second surgical stage remains unclear. So, we aimed to correlate bone healing and, phenotype and function of cells isolated from the induced membrane, in patients whose second surgery was performed on average after 6 months (i.e. beyond the recommended time of one month). Cell phenotype was determined by flow cytometry and cell function by: alkaline Phosphatase enzyme activity, secretion of calcium and von Kossa staining. Second, using histological and immunohistochemistry studies, we aimed to determine the nature and function of induced membrane over time. Seven patients were included with their consent. Results showed Treated patients achieved in all cases bone union (except for one patient) and in in vitro and histology and immunohistochemistry gave some indications which need to be completed in the future. First, patient age seemed to be an indicator of bone union speed and recurrent infection, appeared to influence in vitro MSC osteogenic potential and induced membrane structure. Second, we reported, in bone repair situation, the commitment over time in osteogenic lineage of a surprising multipotent tissue (induced membrane) able of vascularisation/ osteogenesis/ chondrogenesis at a precocious time. Finally, best time to perform the second stage (one month) could be easily exceeded since bone union occurred even at very late times.
Used routinely in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery, the chondrocostal graft is also applied to hand surgery in traumatic or pathologic indications. The purpose of this overview was to analyze at long-term follow-up the radiological and histological evolution of this autograft, in hand and wrist surgery. We extrapolated this autograft technique to the elbow by using perichondrium. Since 1992, 148 patients have undergone chondrocostal autograft: 116 osteoarthritis of the thumb carpometacarpal joint, 18 radioscaphoid arthritis, 6 articular malunions of the distal radius, 4 kienbock's disease, and 4 traumatic loss of cartilage of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. Perichondrium autografts were used in 3 patients with elbow osteoarthritis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed in 19 patients with a mean follow-up of 68 months (4–159). Histological studies were performed on: Whatever the indication, the reconstruction by a chondrocostal/ostochondrocostal or perichondrium graft yielded satisfactory clinical results at long-term follow-up. The main question was the viability of the graft.
Despite the strong mechanical strain in the hand and wrist, chondrocostal graft is a biological arthroplasty that is trustworthy and secure over the long term, although it can cause infrequent complications inherent to this type of surgery. Despite the inevitable histological modification, the cartilage remains alive and is of satisfactory quality at long term follow-up and fulfills the requirements for interposition and reconstruction of an articular surface. The perichondrium graft constitutes a new arsenal to cure cartilage resurfacing. The importance of perichondrium for the survival of the grafted cartilage, as previously reported, as well as its role in resurfacing, is being investigated.
