The hip joint capsular ligaments passively restrain extreme range of motion (ROM), protecting the native hip against impingement, subluxation, edge loading and dislocation. This passive protection against instability would be beneficial following total hip arthroplasty (THA), however the reduced femoral head diameter postoperatively may prevent a wrapping mechanism that is essential to capsular ligament function in the native hip. Therefore we hypothesized that, post-THA, the reduced femoral head size would prevent the capsular ligaments protective biomechanical function. In vitro, THA was performed through the acetabular medial wall preserving the entire capsule, avoiding targeting a particular surgical approach. Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric hips were examined and capsular function was measured by internally/externally rotating the hip in five positions ranging from full extension with abduction, to full flexion with adduction. Three head sizes (28, 32, 36 mm) with three neck lengths (restored native 0, +5, +10 mm) were compared.Background
Methods
The current, most popular recommendation for cup orientation, namely the Lewinnek box, dates back to the 70's, that is to say at the stone age of hip arthroplasty. Although Lewinnek's recommendations have been associated with a reduction of dislocation, some complications, either impingement or edge loading related, have not been eliminated. Early dislocations are becoming very rare and most of them probably occur in “outlier” patients with atypical pelvic/hip kinematics. Because singular problems usually need singular treatments, those patients need a more specific personalised planning of the treatment rather than a basic systematic application of Lewinnek recommendations. We aim in this review to define the potential impacts that the spine-hip relations (SHRs) have on hip arthroplasty. We highlight how recent improvements in hip implants technology and knowledge about SHRs can substantially modify the planning of a THR, and make the «Lewinnek recommendations» not relevant anymore. We propose a new classification of the SHRs with specific treatment recommendations for hip arthroplasty whose goal is to help at establishing a personalized planning of a THR. This new classification (figures 1 and 2) gives a rationale to optimize the short and long-term patient's outcomes by improving stability and reducing edge loading. We believe this new concept could be beneficial for clinical and research purposes.
Optimal results from uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) requires the prosthesis to obtain initial stability, restoration of biomechanics, bone contact along the ingrowth surface and uniform stress transfer to the proximal femur. Anatomic variation within the population makes this difficult to reproduce in every patient. To achieve optimal fit and fill of the proximal femur, options are reshaping the canal or creating an implant which precisely fits the patient's anatomy. The former increases bone loss and risks weakening the supporting bone, creating areas of stress concentration or shielding. Computer assisted design-computer assisted manufacture (CAD-CAM) femoral components were designed to overcome these issues. We present the long term results of CAD-CAM femoral components used in primary THA. This was a prospective study looking at a consecutive, single surgeon series of THA's. Patients were reviewed pre operatively then at 6 weeks, 3 and 12 months post operatively and then yearly. Clinical as well as radiological review was performed at each visit and Harris Hip Score (HHS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Western Ontario McMaster's (WOMAC) scores were calculated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.Introduction
Methods
There is no consensus on the ideal management of young, active patients with disabling coxarthrosis. Within this group, patients with femoral head defects secondary to cysts or avascular necrosis pose particular challenges. Resurfacing arthroplasty is contraindicated and the results of traditional total hip arthroplasty are suboptimal in this group. The BMHR was designed to offer a bone conserving option for these patients. We report the outcome of this device in the short term. This prospective study examines the clinical and radiological outcome of a consecutive series of patients treated with the BMHR arthroplasty. All patients had femoral head defects and disabling hip pain. Patients were reviewed pre operatively and then at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 1year post operatively and then yearly. Oxford, Harris and WOMAC hip scores were calculated at each review. Radiological assessment was also performed at each follow up.Introduction
Methods
The variability of the endosteal geometry after removal of the femoral component can make proximal fit difficult to achieve with an ‘off the shelf’ prosthesis. Whatever the anatomy of the proximal femur, it is important to achieve immediate stability, preserve bone stock and protect the femur from cortical defects which can lead to subsequent fracture. In revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) this requires a large inventory of modular components. The use of custom computer-assisted design-computer-assisted manufacture (CAD-CAM) components negates this need. Little has been published on the use of custom-made components in revision THA. We report the results of a cohort of patients who underwent revision THA using CAD-CAM femoral components. A prospective study was performed between 1991 and 1998. A consecutive series of patients who had revision THA using custom components were assessed clinically and radiologically. The design of the femoral components was governed by the existing femoral bone stock. Patients were reviewed pre operatively then at 6 weeks, 3months and 12 months postoperatively and then annually. Radiographs were assessed at each visit and Oxford, Harris and WOMAC hip scores were calculatedIntroduction
Methods
Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoM HR) has the highest revision rates according to the UK National Joint Registry. Revisions for lesions associated with soft tissue necrosis (pseudotumors) have been associated with poor outcomes. There is a relative paucity of information on early revision of painful HR prostheses. We present the results of a series of patients who underwent early revision of painful MoM HR procedures. This prospective study involved a consecutive series of patients undergoing revision of HR to THA. The diagnoses leading to revision are discussed. Clinical and radiological assessments were performed pre operatively as well as 6 weeks, 12 months postoperatively and yearly thereafter. Pre and post operative Harris Hip Score, Oxford Hip Score and WOMAC scores were calculated. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analogue scale.Introduction
Methods
Patients with osteochondrodysplasia frequently require Total Hip Arthroplasty at a younger age, as a result of early degenerative disease of the hip joint. The outcome of Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty in this group of patients has been reported previously. In this retrospective study we evaluated the outcome of custom made (CADCAM) Total Hip Arthroplasty in patients with osteochondrodysplasia. Between 1974 and 2009, twenty one CADCAM Total Hip Arthroplasty procedures were performed in fourteen patients in our institution. There were eight female and six male patients, with the mean age at time of surgery of 40.95 years (20 to 78). The patients were followed up clinically and with the Harris hip score for a mean of 7.12 years (0.5 to 17 years). Four of the twenty-one hips (23.8%) required revision surgery at a mean of 11.54 years (6.5 to 17 years); one required it for aseptic loosening of the femoral component; one required complete revision of the acetabular component; one required exchange of acetabular liner; and one was for symptomatic non-union of a lesser trochanter avulsion. This study shows encouraging clinical outcomes of custom made (CADCAM) Total Hip Arthroplasty in patients with osteochondrodysplasia,
Total hip replacements have shown great benefits to patients through relief of pain and restoration of function. However, because of the extensive variation in the size and shape of the femoral canal, especially for the situation encountered in the revision hip arthroplasty, standard uncemented hip systems with a limited number of sizes are unable to provide an accurate fit in every case. This study showed clinical results of 112 primary total hip replacements and 158 revision total hip replacements, using custom made CAD-CAM (Computer Aided Design-Computer Aided Manufactured) hip prostheses inserted between 1992 and 1998. For primary hip replacements, the implants were designed to produce proximal line-to-line fit with the femoral bone and to provide optimal biomechanical environment of the hip. The stem was HA coated, 53 males and 58 females were included. Mean age was 46.2 years (range 24.6yrs - 62.2 yrs). The average duration of the follow up was 24 years (10 – 17 years). The mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) was improved from 42.4 to 90.3, mean Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was improved from 43.1 to 18.2 and the mean WOMAC hip score was improved from 57.0 to 11.9. There was 1 revision due to failure of the acetabular components but there were no failures of the femoral components. In the whole follow-up period, the survival of the femoral stem alone was 100%. For revision hip replacements, the implants were designed using our design strategies of graduate approach to different revision situation based on Paprosky's classification of femoral bone defect. The implants were HA coated; some of them had distal cutting flutes. A total of 158 patients (97 males and 61 females) who had operation between 1991 and 1998 were followed up, among them 138 cases were due to aseptic loosening, 6 cases were periprosthetic fractures and 14 cases were infection. The average age was 63.1 years (range 34.6 – 85.9 years). The minimum follow up was 10 years (range 10 – 12 years). The mean Harris Hip Score was improved from 44.2 to 89.3, mean Oxford Hip Score was improved from 41.1 to 18.2 and the mean WOMAC hip score was improved from 52.4 to 12.3 respectively. 6 cases required further revision surgery, among them 3 were due to aseptic implant loosening, the overall survivorship at ten years was 97%. The CAD-CAM hip stems are able to provide optimal implant fixation and restore hip function for every patient regardless their original femoral shape, bone condition and biomechanics of the hip. The excellent medium to long term clinical results justifies the use of CAD-CAM custom hip stems.
We present the medium to long term clinical results of 112 Uncemented custom Computer Assisted Design Computer Assisted Manufactured (CAD-CAM) total hip arthroplasties performed between 1992 and 1998 in 111 patients. Fifty three males and 58 females were included. Mean age was 46.2 years (range 24.6yrs - 62.2 yrs). Average duration of follow up was 156 months (120 – 204 months). The mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 42.4 to 90.3, mean Oxford Hip Score (OHS) improved from 43.1 to 18.2 and the mean WOMAC hip score improved from 57.0 to 11.9. There was 1 revision due to failure of the acetabular components but there were no failures of the femoral components. There were no revisions for aseptic loosening. The worst case survival in this cohort of custom femoral components at an average 13 year follow up (range 10-17 years) was 98.2% (95% Confidence interval 95% to 99%). Survival of the femoral component alone was 100%. These results are comparable with the best medium to long term results for femoral components used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with any means of fixation.
