Restoring more natural kinematics is crucial for the success of knee TKA. The relative size of the tibia to the femur may differ in each patient and requires the possibility to combine different tibia sizes for a given femur size. Therefore, TKA systems need to be designed to allow for different size combinations. In literature some report higher revision rates when the femoral size is greater than the tibia, while others find no impact of the size mismatch on the clinical outcome. The tibio-femoral kinematics resulting from different size combinations has not been analyzed yet. The Columbus Deep Dish implant (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) is designed to allow a full size compatibility. Therefore we hypothesized that the kinematics would not be affected by the different size combinations. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact on kinematics of different tibio-femoral size combinations with the Columbus Deep Dish implant. 6 fresh frozen cadavers were tested in a force controlled well established knee rig after implantation of a cruciate retaining, fixed bearing Columbus Deep Dish TKA (Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany). Femoro-tibial kinematics were recorded while performing a loaded squat from 30° to 130°. Specifically developed and manufactured inlays allowed simulating different tibia sizes on each bone/tibial implant. For each cadaver, a total of 4 different tibia sizes were tested (1 original size, 3 simulated different sizes). Tibio-femoral internal/external rotation and antero-posterior translation of the medial and of the lateral condyles were computed for all size combinations. The kinematics obtained with the simulated sizes were compared to the kinematics obtained with the original inlay. For each flexion angle from 30° to 130°, the difference between the rotation (resp. translation) obtained with the original inlay was subtracted from the rotation obtained with the simulated tibia size. The mean value and standard deviation of the differences were computed.Objectives
Methods
Treatment of massive rotator cuff tears can be challenging. Previous studies with irreparable rotator cuff tears showed good clinical results of tendon healing with the arthroscopic insertion of a protective biodegradable spacer balloon filled with saline solution between the repaired tendon and the acromion [1,2], but so far no scientific evidence has showed how the device alters pressures over the repaired tendon. This biomechanical study investigated the effects of a spacer inserted in the subacromial space on pressures over the repaired rotator cuff tendon in passive motion cycles typical for post-operative rehabilitation routines. Six human cadaveric shoulders were prepared with the humerus cut 15cm below the joint and embedded in a pot, while the scapula fixed at three points on a plate. A rotator cuff tear was simulated and repaired using a suture anchor and a Mason-Allen suture. The specimens were then mounted on a custom-made pneumatic testing rig to induce passive motion cycles of adduction-abduction (90–0°) and flexion-extension (0–40°) with constant glenohumeral and superior loads and tension is exerted on the supraspinatus tendon with weights. A pressure sensor was placed between the supraspinatus tendon and the acromion. After pressure measurements for 15 cycles of each motion type, the InSpace balloon (OrthoSpace, Inc, Israel) was inserted and the specimens tested and pressure measured again for 15 cycles. Statistically significant changes in peak pressures were then measured before and after balloon. Peak pressures were measured near 90 degrees abduction. No statistical differences were observed for internal-external rotation before and after balloon-shaped subacromial spacer was inserted. Mean pressures in abduction-adduction were significantly reduced from 121.7 ± 9.5 MPa to 51.5 ± 1.2 MPa. Peak pressures after repair were 1171.3 ± 99.5 MPa and 1749.6 ± 80.7 MPa in flexion-extension and abduction-adduction motion, respectively, and significantly decreased to 468.7 ± 16.0 MPa and 535.1 ± 27.6 MPa after spacer insertion (p<0.0001). The use of the spacer above the repaired tendon reduced peak pressures and distributed them more widely over the sensor during both abduction-adduction and flexion-extension motions and therefore can reduce the stress on the rotator cuff repair. The InSpace system may reduce the pressure on the repaired tendon, thus potentially protecting the repair. Further studies to investigate this phenomenon are warranted, in particular relating these changes to shoulder kinematics following tear repair and spacer insertion.
Despite consequent advancement in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) up to 20% of patients are not satisfied after having been operated. Beside correct implantation, the design of the TKA-system is supposed to be a key factor of a successful TKA. Consequently it has been tried to restore natural kinematics by the design of the prosthesis. A medially stabilized design therefore is supposed to allow a lateral translation with a medial pivot. Our study compared posterior stabilized (PS) with medially stabilized (MS) TKA-design in terms of kinematics, femorotibial and patellofemoral contact patterns in vitro.Introduction
Objectives
Glenoid loosening, still a main complication in shoulder arthroplasty, could be related to glenohumeral orientation and conformity, cementing techniques, fixation design and periprosthetic bone quality [1,2]. While past numerical analyses were conducted to understand the relative role of these factors, so far none used realistic representations of bone microstructure, which has an impact on structural bone properties [3]. This study aims at using refined microFE models including accurate cortical bone geometry and internal porosity, to evaluate the effects of fixation design, glenohumeral conformity, and bone quality on internal bone tissue and cement stresses under physiological and pathological loads. Four cadaveric scapulae were scanned at 82µm resolution with a high resolution peripheral quantitative computer tomography (XtremeCT Scanco). Images were processed and virtually implantated with two anatomical glenoid replacements (UHMWPE Keeled and Pegged designs, Exactech). These images were converted to microFE models consisting of nearly 43 million elements, with detailed geometries of compact and trabecular bone, implant, and a thin layer of penetrating cement through the porous bone. Bone tissue, implant and cement layer were assigned material properties based on literature. These models were loaded with a central load at the glenohumeral surface, with the opposite bone surface fully constrained. Effects of glenohumeral conformity were simulated with increases of the applied load area from 5mm-radius to a fully conformed case with the entire glenoid surface loaded. The models were additionally subjected to a superiorly shifted load mimicking torn rotator cuff conditions. These models were solved and compared for internal stresses within the structures (Figure 1) with a parallel solver (parFE, ETH Zurich) on a computation cluster, and peak stresses in each region compared by design and related to apparent bone density.Introduction
Methods
Even though the operations are largely successful, complications after joint replacement surgery occur frequently. Approximately 10% of lower limb arthroplasties need surgical revision, of which 70% are due to loosening. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FFDG–PET) in detecting septic and aseptic endoprosthetic loosening of hip and knee endoprostheses.
The sensitivity/specificity for infectious loosening in hip replacement arthroplasties was 67%/83%, in the knee 14%/89%.
Cyclic loading was performed, as it was considered the best way to simulate the postoperative conditions. The maximum tensile strength, the failure mode, and the displacement of the fixation device (system displacement) under load at the first cycle of 75 N and at the maximum tensile strength were recorded.
The absorbable Spiralok 5 mm screw anchor showed the highest failure load with a mean of 223 N. The failure loads of the remaining anchors were similar and ranged from a mean of 169 N for the Super Revo 5 mm, over a mean of 173 N for the Ultrasorb RC anchor to a mean of 188 N for the Bioknotless anchor. Among these anchors the differences were not significant. Only the Spiralok 5 mm screw showed a significantly higher failure load when compared with the Super Revo 5 mm screw. The displacement of the various systems showed significant differences. The displacement of the Bioknotless anchor showed after the cycle with a tensile strength of 75 N a mean displacement of 13.8 mm, which was significant when compared with the remaining anchors.
