The routine use of intraoperative vancomycin powder to prevent postoperative wound infections has not been borne out in the literature in the pediatric spine population. The goal of this study is to determine the impact of vancomycin powder on postoperative wound infection rates and determine its potential impact on microbiology.

A retrospective analysis of the Harms Study Group database of 1269 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients was performed. Patients that underwent a posterior fusion from 2004-2018 were analyzed. A comparative analysis of postoperative infection rates was done between patients that received vancomycin powder to those who did not. Statistical significance was determined using Chi-squared test. Additionally, the microbiology of infected patients was examined.

In total, 765 patients in the vancomycin group (VG) were compared to 504 patients in the non-vancomycin group (NVG). NVG had a significantly higher rate of deep wound infection (p<0.0001) and associated reoperation rate compared to VG (p<0.0001). Both groups were compared for age, gender, race, weight, surgical time, blood loss, number of levels instrumented, and preop curve magnitude. There were significant differences between the groups for race (p<0.0001); surgical time (p=0.0033), and blood loss (p=0.0021). In terms of microbiology, VG grew p.acnes (n=2), and serratia (n=1), whereas NVG grew p.acnes (n=1) and gram positive bacilli (n=1). The remaining cultures were negative.

The use of intraoperative vancomycin powder in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis appears to contribute significantly to deep wound infection prevention and reduction of associated reoperations. Based on this study's limited culture data, Vancomycin does not seem to alter the microbiology of deep wound infections.

Aims

Spinal fusion remains the gold standard in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. However, anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is gaining widespread interest, despite the limited data on its efficacy. The aim of our study was to determine the clinical efficacy of AVBT in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Aims

The aim of this study was to evaluate improvements in the quality and safety of paediatric spinal surgery following the implementation of a specialist Paediatric Spinal Surgical Team (PSST) in the operating theatre.

Aims

The aim of this study was to report a retrospective, consecutive series of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who were treated with posterior minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with a mean follow-up of two years (sd 1.4; 0.9 to 0 3.7). Our objectives were to measure the correction of the deformity and record the peri-operative morbidity. Special attention was paid to the operating time (ORT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS) and further complications.

Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning has become the most common technique for the treatment of Type III displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the loss of reduction in lateral K wiring is non-inferior to crossed K wiring in this procedure.

A prospective randomised non-inferiority trial was conducted. Patients aged three to seven presenting to the Emergency Department with a diagnosis of Type III supracondylar humerus fracture were eligible for inclusion in the study. Consenting patients were block randomised into one of two groups based on wire configuration (lateral or crossed K wires). Surgical technique and post-operative management were standardised between the two groups. The primary outcome was loss of reduction, measured by the change in Baumann's angle immediately post –operation compared to that at the time of K wire removal at three weeks. Secondary outcome data collected included Flynn's elbow score, the humero-capitellar angle, and evidence of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury. Data was analysed using a t-test for independent means.

A total of 52 patients were enrolled at baseline with 23 allocated to the lateral pinning group (44%) and 29 to the cross pinning group (56%). Six patients (5 crossed, 1 lateral) received a third wire and one patient (crossed) did not return for x-rays at pin removal and were therefore excluded from analysis. A total of 45 patients were subsequently analysed (22 lateral and 23 crossed). The mean change in Baumann's angle was 1.05 degrees, 95% CI [-0.29, 2.38] for the lateral group and 0.13 degrees, 95% CI [-1.30, 1.56] for the crossed group. There was no significant difference between the groups in change in Baumann's Angle at the time of pin removal (p = 0.18). Two patients in the crossed group developed post-operative iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries, while none were reported in the lateral group.

Preliminary analysis shows that loss of reduction in Baumann's angle with lateral K wires is not inferior to crossed K wires in the management of Type III supracondylar humerus fractures in children. The results of this study suggest that orthopaedic surgeons who currently use crossed K wires could consider switching to lateral K wires in order to reduce the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries without significantly compromising reduction.

Most long-term follow-up studies report retrospective data, the quality of which remains limited due to their inherent biases. Prospective databases may overcome these limitations, however, feasibility and costs limit their application. To date there exists a paucity of evidence-based literature on which recommendations can be made for the ideal length of follow-up for spinal deformity research. Therefore, our aim was to evaluate the added value of follow-up of patients beyond 2 years following surgery for AIS.

A database registry evaluating surgical outcomes for all consecutive AIS patients with post-op data-points of 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, and 5 year was analysed. Surgeon-reported complications, SRS-22 scores, and radiographic data were evaluated. Complications requiring surgical or medical intervention were compared between patients in whom complications developed within 2 years to those in which newly developed complications occurred between >2–5 years.

536 patients were analysed. SRS-22 scores significantly improved at 2 years post-op with no change at 5-year follow-up. Overall complication rate was 33.2% with majority occurring within 2 years (24.8%). The rate of complications occurring >2–5 years requiring intervention was significantly lower than those requiring intervention within 2 years of surgery (4.7% vs 9.7%, p=0.000), however was not negligible. The most common newly observed complication beyond 2 years was pain (1.9%), followed by surgical site infection (SSI) (1.3%) and implant issues (0.56%). There were no significant differences in the rates of crankshaft (p=0.48), implant issues (p=0.56), pseudarthrosis (p=0.19), and SSI (p=0.13) between the 2 time points.

Although majority of complications following AIS surgery occurs within 2 years, a non-negligible rate of newly observed complications occur at >2–5 years post-op. Specifically crankshaft, pseudarthrosis, implant issues, and SSI have similar rates of occurrence at these 2 time points.

Natural history of AIS >30° in skeletally mature patients is poorly defined. Studies reporting rates and risk factors for progression are predominantly of large curves in immature patients. Our aim was to determine the rate of curve progression in AIS following skeletal maturity, any associated changes in SRS-22 scores, and identify any potential predictors of curve progression.

Patients enrolled in a prospective, longitudinal, multicentre non-surgical AIS database were evaluated. All patients had minimum 2 year follow-up, idiopathic scoliosis >30°, and were skeletally mature. SRS-22 functional outcome scores and radiographic data were compared at baseline and 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on curve size: A=30°-39°, B=40°-49°, C= >50°. Curve progression was defined as any change in curve magnitude.

There were 80 patients, majority females (93.8%) with a mean age of 16.5+/−0.16. Mean BMI was 21+/−0.31 with 15.1% overweight. Mean major cobb at baseline was 38.3°+/−0.88°. At 2 year follow-up 46.3% of curves had progressed an average 3.4°+/−0.38°. Of curves that progressed, patients in group A had the largest mean rate of progression followed by group B. SRS-22 scores on average declined significantly over 2 years in this cohort (4.23 to 4.08; p=0.002). Patients who progressed had on average a more significant decline in SRS outcome scores compared to those that did not (p=0.018, p=0.041 respectively), with the most significant change noted in the Self-Image domain (p=0.03). There was no significant difference in the change in SRS scores over 2 years based on curve size. Univariate analysis did not identify any factors predictive of curve progression in this cohort.

Skeletally mature patients with AIS >30°may continue to have a risk of progression at a mean rate of 1.7°/yr and significant decline in SRS-22 outcome scores, in particular Pain and Self-Image, over time.

Purpose: The wait for surgical treatment of scoliosis is long in some countries, especially in those with publicly funded health care systems. Long wait times may have serious consequences if the deformity increases during the wait period. This study was undertaken to determine the surgeon’s perspective of the type and magnitude of surgery required with specific emphasis on peri – and post-operative measures, for patients with scoliosis on prolonged waitlist times (> 6 months) for surgery.

Method: Radiographs from 11 patients who had a Cobb angle of at least 50 degrees and had waited 6 or more months for scoliosis surgery selected from the scoliosis database. All patients had antero-posterior (AP), AP bending, and lateral radiographs taken when the primary curve magnitude was 50 degrees and at the time of pre-operative planning. 22 radiographic sets and a questionnaire were sent to three different surgeons. The surgeons were blinded to the fact that these sets contained films of the same patients at two different time points. The questionnaire requested information with regard to the type of surgery and instrumentation they would use, other peri-operative measures, and time taken to return to normal activities.

Results: The mean curve progression in the 11 patients was 25 degrees over the time on the waitlist, from an average of 50 degrees to 75 degrees. The type of surgery the surgeon would likely perform changed from posterior instrumentation and fusion with a screw construct in all patients to anterior release and posterior instrumentation and fusion with a screw construct in 8 of the 11 patients, in at least one surgeon’s opinion. The mean estimated operative time increased by 2 hours. The mean estimated length of stay at the hospital increased by 1 day, and the estimated level of difficulty of surgery increased from 3/10 to 5/10.

Conclusion: From a surgeon’s perspective, waits of 6 months or more for scoliosis surgery are unacceptable as they lead to the need for a second anterior procedure that probably would have not been necessary had the operation occurred earlier. It also leads to increased operative time, blood loss, length of stay, and difficulty of surgery. This, in turn, increases unwarranted risks and costs.

Purpose: Upper cervical spine stabilization in children can be challenging due to anatomic abnormalities such as incomplete posterior elements, vertebral artery variability and small patient size. Several techniques have been described for stabilization of the upper cervical spine, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. Since the introduction of the technique by Harms, many authors have shown C1 lateral mass screws to be safe and effective in the stabilization of the upper cervical spine in adults. No large series of paediatric C1 lateral mass screw fixation has been reported in the literature. The purpose of this study was to describe the indications, technique, and outcomes of C1 lateral mass screw fixation in a consecutive series of 11 paediatric patients.

Method: A database generated retrospective review of all patients who underwent C1 lateral mass screw fixation as part of an upper cervical spine stabilization construct was performed. In all patients the C2 dorsal root ganglion was sacrificed. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were obtained through chart review. Radiographs immediately post-operatively, at six-weeks, three-months, and final follow-up were reviewed.

Results: Eleven consecutive paediatric patients underwent bilateral C1 lateral mass screw fixation for a variety of conditions including C1-C2 instability, deformity, congenital malformation, trauma, as well as revision surgery. The average age was 10 years (range 4 to 16 years) with a mean follow-up of 11 months (range 6 – 18 months). There were no iatrogenic vertebral artery, hypoglossal nerve or spinal cord injuries. All 11 patients had solid fusion clinically and radiographically, with no loss of fixation. The C2 dorsal root ganglion was sacrificed in all patients with resulting minor occipital parasthaesia that progressively diminished in severity.

Conclusion: This is the largest series of consecutive patients reported in the literature to date showing that the technique is safe and effective, with acceptable morbidity when applied to the paediatric population. We believe that C1 lateral mass screws offer significant advantages over traditional fixation techniques when the C1 vertebra is to be included in an upper cervical instrumented construct.

Purpose: There is scant literature with respect to reproducibility in radiological measurements of vertebral morphology. The purpose was to determine the reliability of measurement of various parameters of vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis.

Method: Ten patients with AIS were investigated with standardised low dose multi-slice helical CT. Axial reconstructions in the plane of the T8 (apical) vertebra were performed prone, as per Jamieson et al (2008). Antero-posterior (AP) canal diameter, left and right pedicle width, canal width, left and right mid-point to medial pedicle length, left and right pedicle length, and cord length, left and right transverse angles, and left and right canal area were measured by our spine surgeons and spine surgery fellow. Statistical analysis for intra-class coefficients (ICC) for intra and inter observer reliability was then performed.

Results: Intra-observer reliability was excellent, with a mean ICC score of 0.930 (range 0.608–0.996), across all fourteen variables. Inter-observer reliability was very good with a mean ICC score of 0.890 (range 0.360–0.987), across all variables. There was poor inter-observer reliability for measurement of the transverse pedicle angles (0.360 – 0.446). The intra-observer reliability for transverse pedicle angles, whilst good (0.608–0.861), was worse than any of the other intra-observer reliabilities.

Conclusion: We demonstrate excellent intra, and inter observer reliability for measurement of apical vertebrae morphology in AIS. This tool can be utilized in the further study of pedicle dysplasia. Measurement of transverse pedicle angle was less reliable than any of the other measurement variables. A standardised measurement of the morphology of vertebral canal, pedicles and vertebral body morphology is reliable both within individual observers, and across a group of observers. A standardised measure for further investigation has been validated which will enable study of the evolution of pedicle dysplasia over time. This will lead to a better understanding of the etiology of pedicle dysplasia in scoliosis.

Introduction: Reported standardized functional outcome assessment of flexion distraction injuries of the thoracolumbar spinal column seems to be lacking in the literature. The primary focus of this study was the long term functional outcome in this patient population in view of the management employed in a tertiary spine referral center. In an attempt to overcome the lack of pre-injury Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) data, patient recall of the pre-injury state was used.

Secondary outcomes included the long-term disease-specific HRQOL in these patients, the correlation between radiographic alignment and functional outcome, comparison of HRQOL between operative and non-operative care, and identifying potential prognostic factors influencing functional HRQOL.

Method: A database generated retrospective cohort study with a cross-sectional outcome analysis was carried out for patients with a thoracolumbar (T11-L2) flexion-distraction injury treated at a tertiary care referral center between 1995 and 2000.

Inclusion criteria were age over sixteen, and referral to our center for a traumatic thoracolumbar flexion-distraction injury within two weeks of the injury. Exclusion criteria were an associated spinal cord injury, a previous spine injury or a multi-level spine injury, a significant associated other system injury with an ISS > 50, or patient refusal or inability to complete the outcome questionnaires. Patients were followed for a minimum of two years. Injury classification, healing, and alignment were determined by radiographic analysis. Standing lateral x-rays at final follow-up were used to determine the amount of residual kyphosis by two independent observers.

Results: A total of 87 patients were identified by the research database, of which 83 met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twenty-eight patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 55 eligible patients. Eight refused to participate. Of the 47 remaining patients, 40 completed questionnaires representing a response rate of 85%.

There were 26 males and 14 females with a mean age of 27.4 years (range 16–48). Average follow-up was 3.3 years (range 2.5–7). Twenty-five patients (64.9%) were treated operatively and fifteen patients (35.1%) underwent non-operative management. Complications in the surgical group included one non-union, three cases of painful instrumentation, and one infection. In the non-surgical group, two patients developed non-unions requiring surgical intervention.

Comparing the follow-up mean SF-36 PCS and MCS scores to the recalled baseline SF-36 pre-injury scores, demonstrated the patients did not return to baseline physical component and mental component scores (p < 0.001).

The mental component (MCS) and NASS pain scores showed significant statistical difference between the two groups with a trend of non-surgical patients scoring higher.

There was no statistically significant difference in the SF-36 PCS between the two groups.

Linear and multiple regression models identified “associated other system injuries” as the only useful predictor of outcome influencing the SF-36 PCS. Patients with associated injuries are likely to have a poorer prognosis with lower scores.

Radiographically, there was no association between degree of kyphosis at last follow-up and outcome.

Discussion: Long term functional outcome assessment in this patient population and comparison between the surgical and non-surgical groups, revealed a trend in the non-surgical group towards reporting higher scores on both the generic and disease-specific questionnaires. There were also a higher number of complications associated with the surgical group, as well as potential residual back pain related to instrumentation.

Limitations of the study were the retrospective nature of the study, as well as the inherent absence of real time pre-injury quality of life assessment. The study is, however, strengthened by a homogeneous cohort and the use of validated outcome measures. It also involves a cross-sectional analysis and so has a prospective component

Conclusion: The health related quality of life in patients treated for flexion-distraction injuries without spinal cord injury is favorable overall, but does not return to normal after an average of two years following injury, with a trend in the non-surgical group towards reporting higher scores on both the generic and disease-specific questionnaires. Radiographically, no association was found between degrees of focal kyphosis at last follow-up and functional outcome.