Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 204 - 204
1 Sep 2012
Zietz C Fritsche A Mittelmeier W Bader R
Full Access

The prevalent cause of implant failure after total joint replacement is aseptic loosening caused by wear debris. Improvement of the wear behaviour of the articulating bearing between the cup and femoral head is essential for increased survival rate of artificial hip joints. Cross-linking of the polyethylene (PE) material is one attempt to reduce wear particle release at the articulating surface. Various cross-linked polyethylenes (X-PE) are used in orthopaedics since several years.

In total hip arthroplasty (THA) the use of larger femoral head sizes has specific reasons. Larger heads lead to a decreased risk of total hip dislocation and impingement as well as an improved range of motion in comparison to smaller head sizes like 28mm or less. However, the increasing diameter of femoral head can be associated with lower thickness of the PE liner and increased wear rate. Cross-linking of PE can improve the wear rate of the liner and hence supports the use of larger femoral heads. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the wear of standard vs. sequential X-PE (X3-PE) liner in combination with different ceramic femoral head sizes.

Wear testing was performed for 5 million load cycles using standard UHMW-PE liners (N2Vac) and X3-PE liners (each Stryker GmbH & Co. KG, Duisburg, Germany) combined with 28mm ceramic ball heads and the Trident PSL acetabular cup (Stryker). Furthermore, X3-PE liners with an internal diameter of 36mm and 44mm and decreased wall thickness (5.9mm and 3.8mm) were combined with corresponding ceramic heads. An eight station hip wear simulator according to ISO 14242 (EndoLab GmbH, Rosenheim, Germany) was used to carry out the standard wear tests. The tests were realised in temperature-controlled chambers at 37°C containing calf serum (protein content 20g/l).

The average gravimetrical wear rates of the standard UHMW-PE (N2Vac) liners combined with 28mm ceramic heads amounted to 12.6 ± 0.8mg/million cycles. Wear of X3-PE liners in combination with 28 mm ceramic heads was not detectable. The average gravimetrical wear rates of the X3-PE liners in combination with 36mm and 44mm ceramic heads amounted to 2.0 ± 0.5mg and 3.1 ± 0.3mg/million cycles, respectively.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of femoral head size at THA on standard and sequential X-PE liner. The wear simulator tests showed that the wear rate of PE liners with small heads (28mm) decreased by cross-linking of the PE significantly. The amount of wear at X-PE increased slightly with larger head size (36mm and 44mm). However, by sequential cross-linking, the wear rate using thinner liners and larger femoral heads is reduced to a fractional amount of wear at conventional UHMW-PE. Hence, the above-mentioned advantages of larger femoral head diameters can be realised by improved wear behaviour of sequential X-PE.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 206 - 206
1 Sep 2012
Zietz C Fritsche A Lange R Mittelmeier W Bader R
Full Access

Due to increased life expectancy of human population, the amount of total knee replacements (TKR) is expected to increase. TKR reached a high grade of quality and safety, but most often it fail because of aseptic implant loosening caused by polyethylene (PE) wear debris. Wear is generated at the articulating surfaces, e.g. caused by three body particles, like bone fragments or bone cement particles. The aim of this experimental study was to compare the wear of tibial PE inserts combined with metallic and ceramic femoral components at three body wear situation induced by polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and zirconia (ZrO2) particles from the bone cement.

Wear testing was performed for 5 Mio load cycles, using tibial standard PE inserts combined with the same CR femoral component, in two different materials, Cobalt Chromium (CoCrMo) and Biolox delta ® ceramic (Multigen Plus Knee System, Lima Corporate, Italy). A knee wear simulator, according to ISO 14243 (EndoLab GmbH, Rosenheim, Germany), was used to carry out the tests. The tests were performed in temperature-controlled test chambers at 37 °C, containing calf serum with a protein content of 30 g/l. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and zirconia (ZrO2) bone cement particles (Palacos R ®) were manufactured to a size of 30 μm. The three body particles were added at all stations onto the articulating surface of the tibial PE insert (7mg per condyle) at every 500,000 cycles. Wear was determined gravimetrically and the surfaces of tibial inserts were analysed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) after finishing the 5 million cycles. Furthermore, roughness of the PE insert surfaces and the articulating surfaces of the different femoral components were detected and the PE wear particles were analysed by SEM.

The average gravimetrical wear rates of the tibial PE inserts in combination with CoCr and Biolox delta ® ceramic femoral components amounted to 6.4 ± 0.9 mg and 2.6 ± 0.4 mg per million cycles, respectively. Beside bone cement particles on the articulating surface of the PE inserts, polished surfaces and scratches were detected by SEM. In comparison to the untreated surfaces of the PE inserts at both material pairings the surface roughness at the articulating areas showed deep scratches and polished regions. Analyses of the metallic femoral components showed scratches at the articulating surfaces, none on ceramics.

The present study pointed out the effect of femoral component material in an abrasive three body wear situation on the wear properties of TKR. The wear simulator tests showed that wear of PE inserts under three body wear conditions, in combination with ceramic femoral components, was significantly lower than with metallic femoral components. With regard to anti-allergic properties, ceramic femoral components are promising products for TKR.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXVII | Pages 209 - 209
1 Sep 2012
Kluess D Kluess D Begerow I Goebel P Mittelmeier W Bader R
Full Access

Introduction

Due to the commercial launch of newly developed ceramic-on-metal (COM) bearings, we compared the deformation and stresses in the liner with ceramic-on-ceramic (COC), metal-on-metal (MOM) as well as ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) bearings using a finite-element (FE)-model, analyzing a variety of head size and implant position. Liner deformation in terms of change in inner diameter as well as peak stresses were evaluated.

Methods

The FE-model consisting of a commercial THR, the proximal femur and a section of the hemipelvis was created based on our previously published approach. Static load and muscle forces were applied according to the maximum load during gait. Polyethylene was modelled using a nonlinear definition with isotropic hardening, cobalt-chromium was modelled elastic-plastic and ceramic was modelled linear-elastic. Validity of the model was checked using an experimental setup with artificial bone and strain gauges located at the rim of the liner.

Implant material (COM vs. COC vs. MOM vs. COP), head size (28 mm vs. 36 mm) and cup position (45° inclination/15° anteversion vs. 60° incl./0° antev.) were varied.