Although CT is considered the benchmark to measure femoral version, 3D biplanar radiography (hipEOS) has recently emerged as a possible alternative with reduced exposure to ionizing radiation and shorter examination time. The aim of our study was to evaluate femoral stem version in postoperative total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients and compare the accuracy of hipEOS to CT. We hypothesize that there will be no significant difference in calculated femoral stem version measurements between the two imaging methods. In this study, 45 patients who underwent THA between February 2016 and February 2020 and had both a postoperative CT and EOS scan were included for evaluation. A fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist and radiological technician measured femoral version for CT and 3D EOS, respectively. Comparison of values for each imaging modality were assessed for statistical significance.Aims
Methods
Navigation devices are designed to improve a surgeon’s accuracy in positioning the acetabular and femoral components in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to both evaluate the accuracy of an optical computer-assisted surgery (CAS) navigation system and determine whether preoperative spinopelvic mobility (categorized as hypermobile, normal, or stiff) increased the risk of acetabular component placement error. A total of 356 patients undergoing primary THA were prospectively enrolled from November 2016 to March 2018. Clinically relevant error using the CAS system was defined as a difference of > 5° between CAS and 3D radiological reconstruction measurements for acetabular component inclination and anteversion. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine whether hypermobile (Aims
Methods
Spinopelvic mobility plays an important role in functional acetabular component position following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary aim of this study was to determine if spinopelvic hypermobility persists or resolves following THA. Our second aim was to identify patient demographic or radiological factors associated with hypermobility and resolution of hypermobility after THA. This study investigated patients with preoperative posterior hypermobility, defined as a change in sacral slope (SS) from standing to sitting (ΔSSstand-sit) ≥ 30°. Radiological spinopelvic parameters, including SS, pelvic incidence (PI), lumbar lordosis (LL), PI-LL mismatch, anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPt), and spinopelvic tilt (SPT), were measured on preoperative imaging, and at
six weeks and a minimum of
one year postoperatively. The severity of bilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) was graded using Kellgren-Lawrence criteria.Aims
Methods
Patients with spinal pathology who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) have an increased risk of dislocation and revision. The aim of this study was to determine if the use of the Hip-Spine Classification system in these patients would result in a decreased rate of postoperative dislocation in patients with spinal pathology. This prospective, multicentre study evaluated 3,777 consecutive patients undergoing THA by three surgeons, between January 2014 and December 2019. They were categorized using The Hip-Spine Classification system: group 1 with normal spinal alignment; group 2 with a flatback deformity, group 2A with normal spinal mobility, and group 2B with a stiff spine. Flatback deformity was defined by a pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis of > 10°, and spinal stiffness was defined by < 10° change in sacral slope from standing to seated. Each category determined a patient-specific component positioning. Survivorship free of dislocation was recorded and spinopelvic measurements were compared for reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient.Aims
Methods
Patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with prior lumbar spine fusion (LSF) are at high risk for instability with reported incidence of dislocation as high as 8.3%. The use of dual mobility cups in patients undergoing revision THA, another high risk group, has demonstrated decreased incidence of instability. Purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of instability in patients undergoing primary THA with a history of prior LSF using dual mobility cups. This was a multi-center retrospective study with 93 patients undergoing primary THA using a dual mobility cup with prior history of instrumented LSF. The primary outcome investigated was instability. Secondary variables investigated included number of levels fused, approach, length of stay, and other complications. The minimum follow-up time was 1 year since the majority of dislocations occur during first year following the primary THA.Introduction
Methods
The anatomic dual mobility (ADM) technology utilized a monoblock cobalt chromium acetabular component. However, design limitations conferred difficulties controlling orientation during component insertion and inability to confirm full implant seating; the solution resulted in the creation of the modular dual mobility (MDM). The modular implant combines a standard titanium acetabular component and a cobalt chromium liner insert. Due to the metal-on-metal interface on MDM implants, fretting and corrosion releasing metal ions like previous metal-on-metal THA implants, were a concern. This study prospectively reviewed metal ions (cobalt, chromium and titanium) on patients who were at least 1 year post MDM implantation and compared them to patients with an ADM implant and evaluated radiographic seating of the components. All patients with ADM and MDM implants underwent evaluation of metal ions (cobalt, chromium and titanium) at their one year follow-up appointment. Radiographic evaluation for acetabular polar gaps was performed. Elevated metal ions were determined using standard laboratory ranges. Differences in baseline demographics were assessed using the Mann Whitney-U test and Fishers's exact test. Differences in metal ions and implant type were compared using the Fisher's exact tests.Introduction
Methods
While previously underappreciated, factors related to the spine contribute substantially to the risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). These factors must be taken into consideration during preoperative planning for revision THA due to recurrent instability. We developed a protocol to assess the functional position of the spine, the significance of these findings, and how to address different pathologies at the time of revision THA. Prospectively collected data on 111 patients undergoing revision THA for recurrent instability from January 2014 to January 2017 at two institutions were included (protocol group) and matched 1:1 to 111 revisions specifically performed for instability not using this protocol (control group). Mean follow-up was 2.8 years. Protocol patients underwent standardized preoperative imaging including supine and standing anteroposterior (AP) pelvis and lateral radiographs. Each case was scored according to the Hip-Spine Classification in Revision THA.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of implant placement when using robotic assistance during total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 20 patients underwent a planned THA using preoperative CT scans and robotic-assisted software. There were nine men and 11 women (n = 20 hips) with a mean age of 60.8 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
The aims of this study were to measure sagittal standing and sitting lumbar-pelvic-femoral alignment in patients before and following total hip arthroplasty (THA), and to consider what preoperative factors may influence a change in postoperative pelvic position. A total of 161 patients were considered for inclusion. Patients had a mean age of the remaining 61 years (Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this study was to compare the
amount of acetabular bone removed during hip resurfacing (HR) and cementless
total hip replacement (THR), after controlling for the diameter
of the patient’s native femoral head. Based on a power analysis,
64 consecutive patients (68 hips) undergoing HR or THR were prospectively
enrolled in the study. The following data were recorded intra-operatively:
the diameter of the native femoral head, the largest reamer used,
the final size of the acetabular component, the size of the prosthetic
femoral head and whether a decision was made to increase the size
of the acetabular component in order to accommodate a larger prosthetic femoral
head. Results were compared using two-sided, independent samples
Student’s
