Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 122 - 122
1 Mar 2021
Teunissen M Popov-Celeketic J Coeleveld K Meij BP Lafeber F Tryfonidou MA Mastbergen SC
Full Access

Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a joint-preserving treatment strategy for severe osteoarthritis (OA) that provides long-term clinical and structural improvement. Data from both human trials and animal models indicate clear cartilage regeneration from 6 months and onwards post-KJD. However, recent work showed that during distraction, the balance between catabolic and anabolic indicators is directed towards catabolism, as indicated by collagen type 2 markers, proteoglycan (PG) turnover and a catabolic transcription profile [unpublished data]. The focus of this study was to investigate the cartilage directly and 10 weeks after joint distraction in order to elucidate the shift from a catabolic to an anabolic cartilage state.

Knee OA was induced bilaterally in 8 dogs according to the groove model. After 10 weeks of OA induction, all 8 animals received right knee joint distraction, employing the left knee as an OA control. After 8 weeks of distraction, 4 dogs were euthanized and after 10 weeks of follow-up the 4 other dogs. Macroscopic cartilage degeneration and synovial tissue inflammation was assessed using the OARSI canine scoring system. PG content was determined spectrometrically using Alcian Blue dye solution and the synthesis of newly formed PGs was determined using 35SO42- as a tracer, as was described before.

Directly after KJD, macroscopic cartilage damage of the right tibial plateau was higher compared to the left OA control (OARSI score: 1.7±0.2 vs 0.6±0.3; p < 0.001). 10 weeks post-KJD this difference persisted (OARSI score: 1.4± 0.6 vs 0.6±0.3; p = 0.05). Directly after KJD, there was no difference in synovial inflammation between KJD and OA control (OARSI score: 1.4±0.5). At 10 weeks synovial inflammation increased significantly in the distracted knee (OARSI score: 2.1±0.3 vs 1.4±0.5; p < 0.05). Biochemical analysis of the tibia cartilage directly after KJD revealed a lower PG content (20.1±10.3 mg/g vs 23.7±11.7 mg/g). At 10 weeks post-KJD this difference in PG content was less (24.8±6.8 mg/g vs 25.4±7.8 mg/g). The PG synthesis rate directly after KJD appeared significantly lower vs. OA (1.4±0.6 nmol/h.g vs 5.9±4.4 nmol/h.g; p < 0.001)). However, 10 weeks post-KJD this difference was not detected (3.7±1.2 nmol/h.g vs 2.9±0.8 nmol/h.g), and the synthesis rate in the distracted knee was increased compared to directly after distraction (p < 0.01).

Further in-depth investigation of the material is ongoing; these first results suggest that the shift from a catabolic to an anabolic state occurs within the first weeks after joint distraction, mostly reflected in the biochemical changes. As such, the post-distraction period seems to be essential in identifying key-players that support intrinsic cartilage repair.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 1 | Pages 51 - 58
1 Jan 2017
van der Woude JAD Wiegant K van Heerwaarden RJ Spruijt S Emans PJ Mastbergen SC Lafeber FPJG

Aims

Knee joint distraction (KJD) is a relatively new, knee-joint preserving procedure with the goal of delaying total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in young and middle-aged patients. We present a randomised controlled trial comparing the two.

Patients and Methods

The 60 patients ≤ 65 years with end-stage knee osteoarthritis were randomised to either KJD (n = 20) or TKA (n = 40). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, three, six, nine, and 12 months. In the KJD group, the joint space width (JSW) was radiologically assessed, representing a surrogate marker of cartilage thickness.