Postgraduate training in orthopaedics has traditionally been delivered through an apprenticeship model. However, junior doctor working patterns have more recently moved away from a team based structure, potentially affecting training experience. We aimed to compare the perceived quality of training between medical students, junior non-orthopaedic trainees and orthopaedic specialty trainees.

We conducted an anonymous questionnaire of all medical students and trainees rotating through our unit over 24 months. The questionnaire contained 6, 10-point Likert rating scale questions and free text responses. Results were collated and analysed according to training stage.

Of 82 questionnaires distributed, 60 (73%) were completed (18 specialty registrars, 22 junior trainees and 20 medical students). Junior trainees consisted of 8 GPSTs and 14 Foundation Year (FY2) doctors, only one of whom had specifically chosen an orthopaedic placement.

Median Likert rating of training experience was (1 = very poor, 10 = excellent): ST4-ST8 = 8 (range 7–9), ST1-ST3 = 7 (6–9), GPSTs/FY2s = 4 (2–5) and medical students = 8 (7–10). Further analysis of junior non-orthopaedic doctors' training experience showed that placement induction, organisation of formal teaching and opportunities for training out with formal sessions were rated as poor. However, content of delivered teaching was rated highly. Free text responses identified several barriers to training including being too busy on wards and no opportunity for protected teaching.

Our study shows that junior non-orthopaedic trainees feel their training experience during orthopaedic placements is much poorer than orthopaedic trainees and medical students. Time constraints and less team based working patterns may detract from their teaching opportunities. In addition, junior doctors rotating through orthopaedic units now have a wider spectrum of career interests with heterogeneous training needs. Therefore, orthopaedic departments may need to adopt a more targeted training programme that recognises individual training needs if junior doctor training is to improve.

The aim is to report a rare technique for correction of intramedullary nail acute angular deformity.

Intramedullary tibial nail fixation of diaphyseal tibial fractures is the gold standard treatment allowing early mobilisation whilst preserving the soft tissues around the fracture site. Most commonly, intramedullary nails fail by metal fatigue secondary to non union, without significant deformity of the metalwork. Plastic deformity of the nail can result following new acute trauma, particularly before bone union has occurred. This is a clinical challenge as a reamed intramedullary nail is designed to achieve three point fixation with close anatomical fit, such that removal of a bent nail is technically difficult and also risks further damage to bone and soft tissues.

We report a case of a 20 year old patient treated with intramedullary nail fixation of a diaphyseal right tibial fracture who was subsequently assaulted 4 weeks post operatively. This produced an unacceptable deformation of the nail into 25 degrees valgus and procurvatum. To remove the nail, the authors used a previously reported but rare technique of partial (up to 50%) nail division on the convex surface of the apex using Midas Rex High Speed Drill to weaken the nail then manipulation to correct deformity with minimal stress. The technique produced minimal metal debris and allowed simple exchange nail replacement without further complication. The authors believe this is the first reported use of the technique from the United Kingdom.