header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 4 | Pages 494 - 502
1 Apr 2017
Simpson AHRW Keenan G Nayagam S Atkins RM Marsh D Clement ND

Aims

The aim of this double-blind prospective randomised controlled trial was to assess whether low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) accelerated or enhanced the rate of bone healing in adult patients undergoing distraction osteogenesis.

Patients and Methods

A total of 62 adult patients undergoing limb lengthening or bone transport by distraction osteogenesis were randomised to treatment with either an active (n = 32) or a placebo (n = 30) ultrasound device. A standardised corticotomy was performed in the proximal tibial metaphysis and a circular Ilizarov frame was used in all patients. The rate of distraction was also standardised. The primary outcome measure was the time to removal of the frame after adjusting for the length of distraction in days/cm for both the per protocol (PP) and the intention-to-treat (ITT) groups. The assessor was blinded to the form of treatment. A secondary outcome was to identify covariates affecting the time to removal of the frame.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 11 - 11
1 May 2015
Clement N Keenan G Marsh D Nayagam D Atkins R Simpson A
Full Access

We conducted a multicentre two arm double blind randomised controlled trial to assess efficacy of pulsed ultrasound for accelerating the rate of bone healing. Sixty-two skeletally mature adults undergoing limb lengthening, of between 2.5cm to 10cm by distraction osteogenesis, at the proximal tibia using an Ilizarov frame were randomised to either an active or a placebo (control) ultrasound device.

Primary outcome measure was time ready for removal of frame after adjusting for distraction length (days/cm) for both intension to treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) patients. The time at which the frame was removed was determined by the maturation of the regenerate bone. Secondary outcomes were return to weight bearing and covariates affecting time to frame removal.

The baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced, and 90% of patients were managed and followed up as PP. There was no difference in the time to frame removal between the two groups for the ITT (5.0days/cm, p=0.23) or the PP (10.1days/cm, p=0.054). There was no difference in return to weight bearing between the two groups, after adjusting for distraction length, for the ITT or PP patients (p>0.5). Smoking was the only covariate identified to increase the frame removal time (hazard ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.22 to 0.96; p=0.04).

This trial demonstrated no difference in bone healing between those who underwent pulsed ultrasound and those who did not. Smoking was observed to have a significant inhibitory effect on bone healing.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_5 | Pages 11 - 11
1 May 2015
Simpson A Clement N Keenan G Nayagam S Atkins R Marsh D
Full Access

Objective:

To assess efficacy of pulsed ultrasound for accelerating regenerate consolidation.

Design:

A multicentre two arm patient and assessor double blind RCT