High tibial osteotomy is an efficient treatment for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee; its used for middle aged patients with high activity levels and can delay the need for total arthroplasty.

The results of total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy are controversies; several authors reported inferior outcomes, but others have concluded that tibial osteotomy doesn't bias following total arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of failed high tibial osteotomy subsequently converted to total knee arthroplasty and compare the results to group of patients underwere primary arthroplasty; the authors evaluate some of technical problems that a previous high tibial osteotomy can generate, like scar tissue, patellar tendon shortening and changes of proximal tibial anatomy.

High tibial osteotomy is an efficient treatment for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee; its used for middle aged patients with high activity levels and can delay the need for total arthroplasty.

The results of total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy are controversies; several authors reported inferior outcomes, but others have concluded that tibial osteotomy doesn’t bias following total arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of failed high tibial osteotomy subsequently converted to total knee arthroplasty and compare the results to group of patients underwere primary arthroplasty; the authors evaluate some of technical problems that a previous high tibial osteotomy can generate, like scar tissue, patellar tendon shortening and changes of proximal tibial anatomy.

Methods: 50 total knee arthroplasty performed after a previous closed wedge osteotomy were matched with 50 patients operated with a primary knee prosthesis for osteoarthritis. The time from a proximal tibial osteotomy to a prosthesis operation was in mean eight years.

Results: the Knee Society clinical and radiographic score system and W.O.M.A.C. evaluation were used to evaluate knees before surgery and at each follow up (average 5 years).

At an average of five years follow up, the clinical results of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy were similar to those of primary knee prosthesis.

Discussion: in our study revision of failed proximal tibial osteotomy appears to have more technical difficulties but with overall outcomes that remain comparable at results after primary total knee arthroplasty, so tibial osteotomy is considered a valid option in younger and very active patients with unicompartmental arthritis.

High tibial osteotomy is an efficient treatment for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee; its used for middle aged patients with high activity levels and can delay the need for total arthroplasty.

The results of total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy are controversies; several authors reported inferior outcomes, but others have concluded that tibial osteotomy doesn’t bias following total arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of failed high tibial osteotomy subsequently converted to total knee arthroplasty and compare the results to group of patients underwere primary arthroplasty; the authors evaluate some of technical problems that a previous high tibial osteotomy can generate, like scar tissue, patellar tendon shortening and changes of proximal tibial anatomy.

Methods: 50 total knee arthroplasty performed after a previous closed wedge osteotomy were matched with 50 patients operated with a primary knee prosthesis for osteoarthritis. The time from a proximal tibial osteotomy to a prosthesis operation was in mean eight years.

Results: the Knee Society clinical and radiographic score system and W.O.M.A.C. evaluation were used to evaluate knees before surgery and at each follow up (average 5 years).

At an average of five years follow up, the clinical results of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy were similar to those of primary knee prosthesis.

Discussion: in our study revision of failed proximal tibial osteotomy appears to have more technical difficulties but with overall outcomes that remain comparable at results after primary total knee arthroplasty, so tibial osteotomy is considered a valid option in younger and very active patients with unicompartmental arthritis.

Introduction: A prospective study was done to compare the early clinical, radiographic outcomes between the Scorpio CR and Scorpio Flex CR primary total knee replacement.

Methods: 130 Scorpio CR and 40 Scorpio Flex CR were implanted. Patients were prospectively evaluated with a mean follow-up of 3,9 years (2–8 years). Knee Society Score, W.O.M.A.C., range of motion and knee pain was compared. Patients age, level of activity, BMI, were criteria selection for implant of Scorpio Flex CR.

Results: There was more pain in Scorpio CR group, mean flexion was greater in Scorpio Flex CR (112 vs 108); Knee Society score and WOMAC was better in Scorpio Flex CR group.

Conclusion: The Scorpio Flex CR new design may be allow the significant increase in Knee Society score and the better ROM in Scorpio Flex CR group.

Obesity is strongly linked to osteoarthritis; can affect the outcome of total knee arthroplasty and can increase the load on the components with reduction of the implant’s survivorship.

The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes in obese (defined as BMI > 30) and non obese patients.

The Knee Society scoring system and WOMAC was used to evaluate the knees preoperately and at latest follow up.

With a follow up ranging from 1 to 5 years, Knee Society score and WOMAC for the patients who were obese were lower than non obese patients.

Non progressive radiolucent lines were located adjacent to the tibial component in the group of obese patients, but without clinical significance.

High tibial osteotomy is an efficient treatment for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee; its used for middle aged patients with high activity levels and can delay the need for total arthroplasty.

The results of total knee arthroplasty after failed high tibial osteotomy are controversies; several authors reported inferior outcomes, but others have concluded that tibial osteotomy doesn’t bias following total arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of failed high tibial osteotomy subsequently converted to total knee arthroplasty and compare the results to group of patients underwere primary arthroplasty; the authors evaluate some of technical problems that a previous high tibial osteotomy can generate, like scar tissue, patellar tendon shortening and changes of proximal tibial anatomy.

Methods: 50 total knee arthroplasty performed after a previous closed wedge osteotomy were matched with 50 patients operated with a primary knee prosthesis for osteoarthritis. The time from a proximal tibial osteotomy to a prosthesis operation was in mean eight years.

Results: the Knee Society clinical and radiographic score system and W.O.M.A.C. evaluation were used to evaluate knees before surgery and at each follow up (average 5 years).

At an average of five years follow up, the clinical results of total knee arthroplasty after high tibial osteotomy were similar to those of primary knee prosthesis.

Discussion: in our study revision of failed proximal tibial osteotomy appears to have more technical difficulties but with overall outcomes that remain comparable at results after primary total knee arthroplasty, so tibial osteotomy is considered a valid option in younger and very active patients with unicompartmental arthritis.