We report the impact of implementing a new short-stay hip and knee arthroplasty pathway in a National Health Service (NHS) hospital. This was enacted due to existing concerns with a long length of stay (LOS) and reduced elective operating capacity each winter due to emergency bed pressures. The overnight introduction of this pathway was aimed to reduce LOS, alleviate bed pressures, minimise readmission rates and generate financial savings, all combining to facilitate full elective activity during the winter. We conducted a prospective study at a regional tertiary arthroplasty centre. The new pathway was introduced across the service overnight. It includes rigorous preoperative optimisation, specific anaesthetic protocols and uniform changes in surgical practice to allow a focus on early mobilization and discharge on the day of surgery where possible. Data collection spanned 17 months, including the initial six months post implementation of the short-stay pathway. LOS data was collected for the full period and data was compared pre- and post-implementation of the new pathway. Patient satisfaction and 30-day readmission data were also collected. There was an immediate and significant decrease in median LOS from 4 days pre-implementation to 1 day post-implementation. Patient satisfaction was high, and the 30-day readmission rate was unchanged (5.95%), with no readmissions directly related to decreased inpatient stay. Financial analyses revealed substantial cost savings due to reduced LOS and the elimination of routine post-operative blood tests, estimated at over £1.6m per year. Elective activity over winter was significantly higher (79%) than in the same time period in the previous year. An acute introduction of a carefully planned and coordinated short-stay hip and knee pathway is safe, cost-effective and popular with patients, but also contributes to increased efficiency in the delivery of elective healthcare in the context of increasing demand and financial constraints in the NHS.
Cite this article:
Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) are complex procedures with higher rates of re-revision, complications, and mortality compared to primary TKA and THA. We report the effects of the establishment of a revision arthroplasty network (the East Midlands Specialist Orthopaedic Network; EMSON) on outcomes of rTKA and rTHA. The revision arthroplasty network was established in January 2015 and covered five hospitals in the Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire areas of the East Midlands of England. This comprises a collaborative weekly multidisciplinary meeting where upcoming rTKA and rTHA procedures are discussed, and a plan agreed. Using the Hospital Episode Statistics database, revision procedures carried out between April 2011 and March 2018 (allowing two-year follow-up) from the five network hospitals were compared to all other hospitals in England. Age, sex, and mean Hospital Frailty Risk scores were used as covariates. The primary outcome was re-revision surgery within one year of the index revision. Secondary outcomes were re-revision surgery within two years, any complication within one and two years, and median length of hospital stay.Aims
Methods
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a very successful and cost-effective operation, yet debate continues about the optimum fixation philosophy in different age groups. The concept of the 'cementless paradox' and the UK 'Getting it Right First Time' initiative encourage increased use of cemented fixation due to purported lower revision rates, especially in elderly patients, and decreased cost. In a high-volume, tertiary referral centre, we identified 10,112 THAs from a prospectively collected database, including 1,699 cemented THAs, 5,782 hybrid THAs, and 2,631 cementless THAs. The endpoint was revision for any reason. Secondary analysis included examination of implant survivorship in patients aged over 70 years, over 75 years, and over 80 years at primary THA.Aims
Methods
To determine mortality risk after first revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for periprosthetic femoral fracture (PFF), and to compare this to mortality risk after primary and first revision THA for other common indications. The study cohort consisted of THAs recorded in the National Joint Registry between 2003 and 2015, linked to national mortality data. First revision THAs for PFF, infection, dislocation, and aseptic loosening were identified. We used a flexible parametric model to estimate the cumulative incidence function of death at 90 days, one year, and five years following first revision THA and primary THA, in the presence of further revision as a competing risk. Analysis covariates were age, sex, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of Vancouver
type B2 and B3 fractures by performing a systematic review of the
methods of surgical treatment which have been reported. A systematic search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and
the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. For inclusion,
studies required a minimum of ten patients with a Vancouver type
B2 and/or ten patients with a Vancouver type B3 fracture, a minimum
mean follow-up of two years and outcomes which were matched to the type
of fracture. Studies were also required to report the rate of re-operation
as an outcome measure. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO
database. Aims
Materials and Methods
We treated 50 consecutive patients with infected total hip arthroplasties according to a standard protocol. Previous surgery to eradicate the infection had been attempted in 13 patients and discharging sinuses were present in 20. Aspiration arthrography was routinely carried out before our interventions. The first stage was a meticulous removal of all foreign and potentially infected material. Samples were taken for culture and a thorough lavage carried out. Antibiotic-loaded beads were placed in the femoral shaft and an antibiotic-loaded cement ball in the acetabulum. At the second stage an uncemented arthroplasty was introduced. Bone allograft was used in 18 patients. The interval between procedures was usually three weeks, but this was extended if the wound was slow to heal or there was extensive bony destruction. Appropriate antibiotics were given for three months. At a mean follow-up of 5.8 years the rate of reinfection was 8% (4 patients). Two of these patients have had another, successful, two-stage revision. At this medium-term review, a satisfactory clinical and radiological outcome was obtained in all except two patients.
