In TG hydroxyprolin followed the same trend showing a significant decrease after the six month treatment (18±3,2 mg/l vs 13±3,6 mg/l p<
0,05). At the same time B-ALP reduction was almost significant (36±4,8% vs 23±3,9% p=0,06) DEXA demonstrated an improvement in total foot mineralization in the TG(0,18±0,06 g/cm2 vs 0,24±0,08 g/cm2 p<
0,05) and in the distal phalanxes (0,194 g/cm2 vs 0,242 g/cm2 p<
0,01) (fig. 3). Only the TG showed a significant decrease of IGF-1 throughout the trial (142,8±24 vs 123,5±41 ng/ml p<
0,05).
Six patients presented a structural derangement localized to the forefoot (Pattern I according to Sanders and Frykberg Classification), one to the ankle (Pattern IV) and 18 to the mid-foot region (Pattern II and III). At first clinical evaluation, 13 patients presented a plantar monolateral ulcer. Their treatment was multifactorial. An offloading regimen was adopted, with the use of a total contact cast and crutches, in order to avoid weight-bearing on the affected foot for the first two months. Patients responsive to the treatment were successively treated with a pneumatic cast (Air cast) and partial weight-bearing for another four months. Four unresponsive patients underwent surgical treatment. 10 patients were also treated with alendronate (70 mg per os once a week). Three patients died during treatment and one during the follow-up, three of them for cardiovascular disease, one for bronchopneumopathy.
We performed 55 operations in 40 patients affected by diabetic foot and referred to the Diabetic Day Hospital from 1998 to 2003. Surgical procedures can be grouped as: (a) emergency operations: mostly for surgical debridment; (b) operations such as functional amputation of the limb at various levels; and (c) conservative operations such as preventive correction of deformities or restoration of morphology and function. We performed 39 amputations; 15 conservative procedures (including ring external fixation in “Charcot foot”); and one emergency procedure (sepsis). We never used local ischaemia while operating diabetic patients. Patients follow-up ranges from 6 months to 6 years. One fourth of patients died for reasons not directly associated with diabetic foot but often related to the diabetes. The vast majority of patients mantained adequate control of the disease, wore special “diabetic shoes”, and judged the result of the operation very positively and consider their situation much improved after the operation. Surgical wound closure took from 2 to 20 weeks (mean 6 weeks). More than half of the patients can walk without support. It is relevant to note that about half of the patients had previous operations for the same problem but about 90% of the patients required no further operation after the one we performed. Orthopaedic surgical treatment may effectively restore walking ability in those patients who lost it because of diabetic foot problems.