Goals: Sarcomatous degeneration of giant cell tumours (GCT) occurs rarely. It occurs in less than 1% of the cases, and most of them are GCT previously treated with radiotherapy. The goal of this presentation is to review the CGT cases treated at our unit that have evolved towards malignization.

Methods: Retrospective study of 96 GCT treated at our Hospital between 1983 and 2005. 5 presented sarcomatous degeneration in their evolution. These were the cases of 3 men and 2 women with a mean age of malignization of 42 years (32 years – 54 years). The median follow-up period was 155 months (5 months – 209 months). 3 cases affected the distal femur, one case affected distal radius and one case affected proximal humerus, with a slight tendency to the right hemibody. The primary treatment for GCT in these patients was curettage and bone graft. Only one case had received previous radiotherapy. In the same period of time we had two cases of lung dissemination of CGT with typical histology, without previous malignization of tumour.

Results: Malignization takes place, on average, at the 1.8th recurrence (1.3). Histologically, we find 3 osteosarcomas and 2 indifferentiated tumours. Three patients developed distant dissemination; 2 patients died due to lung metastases, with a mean time between the first surgery and the sarcomatous degeneration of 90 months (40 monts – 183 months) and a mean time between malignization and mestastases of 22.3 months (9 months – 34 months) The treatment, once the malignization was diagnosed, consisted in wide resection and substitution with mega-arthroplasty in cases of distal femur and osteoarticular graft at the shoulder. 2 cases required amputation of the affected limb due to irresecable recurrence in soft tissues.

Conclusions: There is no predictive criteria of which type of primary typical CGT will evolve into sarcoma. The malignization always has as a result high grade sarcomas, with a high tendency to hematogenous dissemination. When lung metastases appear the survival prognosis is a number of months. We must suspect malignization of a benign CGT when one of the relapses shows a very rapid growth with radiologic aggressive characteristics; in these cases we prefer wide resection of the tumour instead of curettage and thus we prevent the possible sarcomatous degeneration.

Introduction and purpose: The results of hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures are controversial since there are wide variations across series. In what follows, we shall present our experience and results with the implants we use, with a minimum follow-up of one year.

Materials and methods: 87 prostheses were revised (hemiartroplasty with cemented Neer II endoprosthesis) with a minimum follow-up of one year (1 to 10); 74 females and 13 males, 53 right and 34 left, with a mean age of 73.3 years (range: 51 – 82). Indications included three-part fractures (15 cases), four-part fractures (66) and fracture-dislocation (6). All patients were put on a postop customized standardized physical therapy program.

Results: The Constant test was performed after 3, 6 and 12 months postop, with a mean result of 44.57 points after 3 months, 49.52 after 6 months and 64.37 after 12 months. 90% of patients had either no pain or occasional pain and 85% of them subjectively described their condition as very good. Two patients were revised: one as a result of a lysis in his lesser tuberosity and the other because of a painful implant. There were two instances of a periprosthetic fracture and three infections (2 late ones and a post-fracture one).

Conclusions: Although these results might seem poor, it should be emphasized that heimarthroplasty led to a predictable absence of pain and to a perception by the patient that the result obtained was very good. Even if it is true that certain limitations were observed in terms of function and strength, patients were able to perform many of their daily life activities and gain a substantial degree of independence, albeit with certain restrictions. For this reason we consider the technique described as the procedure of choice for these types of fractures.

Aims: The knee is the commonest articular location in osteosarcoma (OS). We study the complications in limb salvage due to OS in knee reconstructions.

Methods: In our series of 107 OS for the period 1983–1998, limb salvage procedure was possible in 78 cases and the amputation was necessary in 29 patients. The Knee reconstruction includes 62 cases (39 due to femur OS and 23 due to tibia OS). All cases were treated with preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy. The average follow-up was 87.4 months with a range of 55 to 183 months.

Results: Complications in re-constructions due to femur OS:

– Local recurrence 2/39 (5.13%)

– Infection 2/39 (5.13%)

– Fatigue fracture (7.6%) Complications in tibia re-constructions:

– Local recurrences 3/23 (13%)

– Infection 5/23 (21.7%)

Patellar tendon tear off 2/23 (8.7%)

Fatigue fracture 1/23 (4.35%).

Conclusions: The rate of complications in tibia is higher than in femur.

The infections in tibia limb salvage are related to skin coverage.

The local recurrence in tibia is related to anatomical problems to achieve wide resections

Introduction and Objectives: Extraskeletal osseous sarcomas are very rare high-grade tumours. They include osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, and Ewing’s soft tissue sarcoma and their respective variants. We present a retrospective study of 25 cases covering the period from December 2002 to January 2003.

Materials and Methods: This study of 25 cases shows that this heterogeneous group of soft tissue sarcomas primarily affects adults (mean age 50.68; range 17 to 70 years). The thigh (36.60%) and the elbow-forearm (18.18%) are the most common locations for these tumours. In these cases, 14 chondrosarcomas, 8 osteosarcomas, and 3 Ewing’s sarcomas were diagnosed. Mean follow-up time was 48.9 months with a range of 16 to 197 months. There were 16 surgeries performed with wide or compartmental margins, while in the 5 remaining cases, amputations were performed, and one case of Ewing’s sarcoma of the pelvis was treated by means of chemotherapy and radiation therapy, as it was considered non-resectable. All cases of osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma were treated by means of pre- and postoperative chemotherapy and postoperative radiation therapy.

Results: The postoperative duration of symptoms ranged from 2 weeks to 6 years with a mean of 6 months. Local recurrence following surgery with wide or compartmental margens occurred in 8 cases, representing 35.45% (3 chondrosarcomas, 4 osteosarcomas, and 1 Ewing’s sarcoma). The total number of cases surviving without recurrence is 14 (63.6%), surviving cases with one or more recurrences is 5 (22.72%), one case is alive with metastasis (4.59%), and 3 sarcomas (2 ulcerated upon admission) had disseminated and the patients died (10.05%).

Discussion and Conclusions: All these tumours were high-grade sarcomas. The most common metastatic localizations were lungs, regional ganglia, and skeleton. The recommended treatment is surgery with wide or compartmental margins, if possible in the early stages, in conjunction with chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The worst prognosis corresponds to the osteosarcoma.

Introduction and Objectives: Giant cell tumour (GCT) of the bone is an “aggressive tumor characterized by highly-vascularized tissue consisting of ovoid or fusiform cells and the presence of numerous gigantic osteoclast-like cells distributed uniformly throughout the tumor tissue” (WHO). The aim of this report is to present our experience over the past 19 years (1983–2002) with GCT of the bone treated in our unit.

Materials and Methods: From January 1983 to January 2002, we have treated 67 cases of GCT of the bone, excluding all cases with less than 12 months of follow up. Age at presentation ranged 10 to 17 years. There was a higher incidence from 20 to 40 years of age. There was a moderately higher rate in women compared to men (1.5:1). The most common locations were the distal epiphysis of the femur, proximal epiphysis of the tibia, and the distal end of the radius. This type of tumour generally localises to the epiphysis and subsequently invades the metaphysis. Localization to the axial skeleton is rare. Radiologic diagnosis was achieved by simple local radiology, CT scan, and MRI. Histopathologic diagnosis was done by means of biopsy using a trocar guided by an image intensifier. In cases of central localization, we obtained the sample by CT-guided biopsy. The treatment of choice is aggressive curettage (high-velocity burr) and filling with frozen cancellous chips. Radiation therapy is useful in cases of localization that are not accessible by surgery.

Results: GCT of the bone possesses several unique characteristics, which make it different from other intermediate tumors: a high rate of recurrence (up to 50%), the possibility of sarcomatous degeneration, and the possibility of pulmonary metastasis (even in non-malignant cases). We believe the ideal treatment is resection of the bone where the tumour is located (useful on the head of the fibula, distal end of the ulna, ribs, some bones of the hand and feet, and the patella). In view of its usual localization near the knee (50%), our usual treatment is aggressive curettage (high-speed burr) and filling with frozen cancellous chips. We have treated 26 recurrent cases out of 67 patients treated in our unit (38.8%). Of these, approximately 50% were referred from other centres. Treatment of recurrence has generally been aggressive curettage and addition of allografts. Sarcomatous degeneration occurred in 3 cases (4.5%), all of which were high grade sarcomas of the malignant fibrous histiocytoma type. One case survived following amputation of the extremity, and the other 2 cases died as a result of pulmonary metastasis.

Discussion and Conclusions: Alternative local treatment methods exist for GCT of the bone such as cryosurgery, phenolization, and cementing. However, we cannot comment on these methods due to a lack of experience with them. The aim of all these methods is to cauterize the tumour bed. We prefer aggressive curettage and filling with cancellous bone in an attempt to use a more biological treatment.

Introduction and Objectives: This study analyses the results of our experience in reconstruction of high-grade sarcomas of the proximal humerus.

Materials and Methods: A total of 37 patients were treated from March 1983 to December 2001. Average age was 24 years (19–38), with 21 males and 16 females, all presenting with high-grade sarcomas of the proximal humerus. The primary tumour was osteosarcoma in 49% (n=18) of cases, chondrosarcoma in 22% (n=8), Ewing’s sarcoma in 13% (n=5), parosteal sarcoma in 8% (n=3), malignant fibrous histiocytoma in 5% (n=2), and adamantinoma in 3% (n=1). All cases were classified as Type 1 Malawer resections (intraarticular resections of the proximal humerus).

Results: During this period, scapulohumeral or scapulothoracic disarticulation was performed in 32% of cases (12 patients). In the remaining 68% (25 cases), limb salvage surgery was performed (relative limb salvage rate: 67.5%). In terms of reconstruction type, 6 cases received megaprotheses, and the remaining 19 cases received osteoarticular allografts of the humerus. Four of the 25 patients had reconstructions with sufficient follow-up time to be considered survivors without recurrence. Results were “acceptable” based on the Enneking-MTS functional scale (overall movement arcs in all directions between 60–120° with tolerable subluxations.) From a subjective point of view, all the patients obtained good results in terms of physical health and mobility of distal joints. No analysis was done of survival due to the varied nature of the neoplasias and adjuvant therapies. The main complication was fracture of the osteoarticular allograft, which occurred in 4 of 19 cases (21%). Subluxation was practically constant throughout our series but was of relatively minor clinical significance.

Discussion and Conclusions: The results obtained in this study in terms of local and functional control are similar to those reported in the literature. In spite of the poor functional results for the shoulder joint, the functional results for distal joints and the cosmetic appearance of the extremity are satisfactory. However, the high rate of allograft fractures forces us to reconsider our reconstruction technique, placing priority on a mixed reconstruction using both allograft and mega-prosthesis.

Introduction and Objectives: Half of primary tumors tend to disseminate to bones, and metastasis to bone is the third most common localisation for disseminated disease, after the lungs and liver. It is also the most common form of neoplasia in the skeleton. Treatment of bone metastasis is essentially palliative, and in select cases improves patient survival. We present results from the last 15 years in our centre.

Materials and Methods: Between the years 1988–2003, our surgical oncology unit has treated 451 patients with bone metastasis. Of these, 49% were male, and 51% were female. Average age was 64 years (19–98). The most common causes were metastatic breast cancer (34%), unknown tumours (17%), multiple myeloma (9%), prostate cancer (9%), lung cancer (7%), bladder cancer (6%), and others (18%). Tumours localised to the following locations: femur (31%), spine (27%), multiple locations (13%), pelvis (11.5%), humerus (9%), and other locations (8.5%). In 69% of cases the first symptom was pain, in 28% pathologic fracture, and in the remaining 3% medullary compression. Of the 125 pathologic fractures, 71% were on the femur, 18% on the humerus, and the remaining 11% in other locations.

Results: In 60% of cases (271 patients) conservative treatment was used, and in the remaining 40% (180 patients) surgical treatment was used. Of the 180 surgeries, 50.5% were for pathologic fractures, and 49.5% were prophylactic surgeries. Of the 125 pathologic fractures, 91 (73%) received surgical treatment, and the other 34 (27%) were treated conservatively. Intramedullary nailing was the most commonly used form of osteosynthesis (47%). Total resolution of pain was achieved in 86.5% of cases, and partial resolution in 13.5%. Mean time in bed from prophylactic surgery was 3 days. Mean time for recovery of function was 7 days for the arms and 11 days for the legs.

Discussion and Conclusions: The fundamental goal is to offer short-term individualized treatment to control pain and avoid bedrest and hospitalization of these patients. Prophylactic surgery does not increase life expectancy of these patients. However, it does alleviate pain, avoids bedrest, and improves functionality. It should be kept in mind that the least aggressive surgical technique possible should be used.