The aim of this study was to compare any differences in the primary outcome (biphasic flexion knee moment during gait) of robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at one year post-surgery. A total of 76 patients (34 bi-UKA and 42 TKA patients) were analyzed in a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Flat ground shod gait analysis was performed preoperatively and one year postoperatively. Knee flexion moment was calculated from motion capture markers and force plates. The same setup determined proprioception outcomes during a joint position sense test and one-leg standing. Surgery allocation, surgeon, and secondary outcomes were analyzed for prediction of the primary outcome from a binary regression model.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) during the first six weeks and at one year postoperatively. A per protocol analysis of 76 patients, 43 of whom underwent TKA and 34 of whom underwent bi-UKA, was performed from a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Diaries kept by the patients recorded pain, function, and the use of analgesics daily throughout the first week and weekly between the second and sixth weeks. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared preoperatively, and at three months and one year postoperatively. Data were also compared longitudinally and a subgroup analysis was conducted, stratified by preoperative PROM status.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to compare robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bi-UKA) with conventional mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine the changes in the anatomy of the knee and alignment of the lower limb following surgery. An analysis of 38 patients who underwent TKA and 32 who underwent bi-UKA was performed as a secondary study from a prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial. CT imaging was used to measure coronal, sagittal, and axial alignment of the knee preoperatively and at three months postoperatively to determine changes in anatomy that had occurred as a result of the surgery. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) was also measured to identify any differences between the two groups.Aims
Methods
The objective of this study was to compare differences in alignment following robotic arm-assisted bi-unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (Bi-UKA) and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This was a prospective, randomised controlled trial of 70 patients. 39 TKAs were implanted manually, as per standard protocol at our institution, and 31 Bi-UKA patients simultaneously received fixed-bearing medial and lateral UKAs, implanted using robotic arm-assistance. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative CT scans were analysed to determine hip knee ankle angle (HKAA), medial distal femoral angle (MDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). Analysis was repeated for 10 patients by a second rater to validate measurement reliability by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Mean change in HKAA towards neutral was 2.7° in TKA patients and 2.3° in Bi-UKA patients (P=0.6). Mean change in MDFA was 2.5° for TKA and 1.0° for Bi-UKA (P<0.01). Mean change in MPTA was 3.7° for TKA and 0.8° for Bi-UKA (P<0.01). Mean postoperative MDFA and MPTA for TKAs were 89.8° and 89.6° respectively, indicating orientation of femoral and tibial components perpendicular to the mechanical axis. Mean postoperative MDFA and MPTA for Bi-UKAs were 91.0° and 86.9° respectively, indicating a more oblique joint line orientation. Inter-rater agreement was excellent (ICC>0.99). Early functional activities, according to the new Knee Society Scoring System, favoured Bi-UKAs (P<0.05). Robotic arm-assisted, cruciate-sparing Bi-UKA better maintains the natural anatomy of the knee in the coronal plane and may therefore preserve normal joint kinematics, compared to a mechanically aligned TKA. This has been achieved without significantly altering overall HKAA.
Consequent upon a retrospective audit of all acute tibial nail patients within GRI in 2010, it was agreed, due to variable follow-up, imaging and requirement for secondary intervention, a standardised protocol for management of acutely nailed tibial fractures within GRI was to be established. Subsequently, a Nurse Led Tibial Nail Clinic commenced in July 201. The majority of consultants (11 of 13) devolving follow up of these patients to a protocol based algorithm designed on evidence based principles and consensus expert opinion. Aims were to standardise/improve management of tibial nail patients in terms of patient education, weight bearing, imaging, follow-up intervals and also coordinate secondary intervention via a single consultant with an interest in limb reconstruction/non union. A secondary goal was to achieve measureable outcome data for this subgroup of patients. All patients underwent post operative radiographs prior to discharge, review in clinic at 10 days for wound assessment, 6 weeks for physiotherapy and 12 weeks where standard AP and lateral tibial radiographs were repeated. Patients are discharged at 12 weeks if the radiographs confirm bony healing on three cortices or more and fractures are clinically united. If not, repeat x rays are undertaken at 20 weeks. A parallel consultant led limb reconstruction clinic is available to review patients failing to demonstrate satisfactory progression to union with secondary intervention instigated thereafter as appropriate. Since commencement of the Nurse Led Tibial Nail Clinic, 60 patients have been treated with a tibial nail, 44 managed in the Tibial Nail Clinic. The mean number of radiographs has reduced from 6.4 to 3.1 per patient to discharge. Clinic visits are reduced from 6.4 to 3.9 per patient to discharge. Non compliance is low with 4.6% of patients failing to attend. Secondary interventions have been low (13%), confirming a relatively benign course of healing for most patients treated with an IM nail for acute tibial fractures. There has been one non union, no deep infections, two nail removals and one DVT. A protocol based specialist nurse led clinic is safe for patients, cost effective for the NHS and gives increased opportunity for measuring outcome and improving care in a previously heterogenously managed group of patients.
Atraumatic compartment syndrome results from prolonged compression of a limb by an obtunded subject. It is most commonly seen in drug abusers and presentation is frequently late. The key factor in the pathogenesis is the fact that muscle necrosis precedes the development of a compartment syndrome. We set out to establish if surgical decompression of these compartment syndromes, as recommended in the literature, was justified. We reviewed 16 patients who underwent decompression of 19 limbs within our unit. Patients presented between 5 and 100 hours following their overdose (mean 30.5 hours) and surgery was performed at a mean time of 64.5 hours after admission. Surgical decompression resulted in the requirement for multiple operations, mean 3.7, and an extremely high complication rate. Infection was particularly prevalent, occurring in 10 of the 19 limbs decompressed. Only one of the 16 patients had normal limb function at follow up. Based on these results and an understanding of the pathogenesis of the condition, we conclude that surgical decompression of atraumatic compartment syndromes is illogical, leads to an increased complication rate and is therefore unjustified.
