header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 6 - 6
1 May 2014
MacLeod K Freeman H Tate A Eardley W
Full Access

Best Practice Tariff (BPT) recommends operation for hip fracture within 36 hours. Anticoagulation reversal often delays this. Audit of our service, to establish the impact on BPT of anticoagulation reversal, showed a loss of revenue and delays. Subsequently an ‘early trigger’ Intravenous Vitamin K (IVK) pathway was introduced and re-audit completed. Hip fracture patients admitted over a 32-month period were reviewed. Primary outcome was time to theatre for warfarinised and non-warfarinised patients. This was analysed using independent t-tests. A change in practice, involving nurse led administration of 2mg IVK in the Emergency Department prior to knowledge of the coagulation screen, was instigated. Three months later a re-audit occurred. In the first audit cycle, 83 patients were admitted on warfarin with a median time to theatre of 49.7 hours. 21% of these patients gained BPT. Following protocol change, over three months, 14 warfarinised hip fracture patients were admitted. Twelve patients achieved satisfactory reversal; eight with one IVK administration. Median time to theatre was 33.9h. Compliance with BPT in terms of delay due to anticoagulation was 86%. Our audit demonstrates that ‘early-trigger’ IVK reduces delays to theatre and helps reduce BPT related financial loss. It enables high quality patient-centred care within financial constraints.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 11 - 11
1 May 2014
Wood A Robertson G Macleod K Heil K Keenan A Court-Brown C
Full Access

Open fractures are uncommon in the UK sporting population, however because of their morbidity then are a significant patient group. Currently there is very little in the literature describing the epidemiology of open fracture in sport. We describe the epidemiology of sport related open fractures from one centre's adult patient population.

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database recording all sport related open fracture s over a 15 year period in a standard population.

Over the 15 year period, there were 85 fractures in 84 patients. The mean age was 29.2 years (range 15–67). 70 (83%) were male and fourteen female (17%). The six most common sports were football (n=19, 22%), rugby (n=9, 11%), cycling (n=8, 9%), hockey (n=8, 9%); horse riding (n=6, 7%) and skiing (n=6, 7%). The top five anatomical locations were fingers phalanges, 35%; tibia-fibula 23%; foreman 14%; ankle 11% and metacarpals 5%. The mean injury severity score was 7.02. Forty five patients were grade 1; 28 patients were grade 2; 8 patients were grade 3a; and 4 were grade 3b according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification system. Seven patients (8%) required plastic surgical intervention for the treatment of these fractures. The types of flaps used were split skin graft (n=4), fasciocutaneous flaps (n=2); and adipofascial flap (n=1).

We looked at the epidemiology open fractures secondary to sport in one centre over a 15 year period. Football was the most common sport (22%) and within football, the most common site was the tibia and fibula. In contrast, within the cohort a whole the majority of fractures were upper limb, with the hand being the most common site. Whilst not common in sport, when they are sustained they are frequently occur on muddy sport fields or forest tracks and must be treated appropriately. A good understanding of the range and variety of injuries commonly sustained in different sports is important for clinicians and sports therapists.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 3 | Pages 290 - 294
1 Mar 2013
MacLeod K Lingham A Chatha H Lewis J Parkes A Grange S Smitham PJ

Clinicians are often asked by patients, “When can I drive again?” after lower limb injury or surgery. This question is difficult to answer in the absence of any guidelines. This review aims to collate the currently available evidence and discuss the factors that influence the decision to allow a patient to return to driving. Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched using the following terms: ‘brake reaction time’, ‘brake response time’, ‘braking force’, ‘brake pedal force’, ‘resume driving’, ‘rate of application of force’, ‘driving after injury’, ‘joint replacement and driving’, and ‘fracture and driving’. Of the relevant literature identified, most studies used the brake reaction time and total brake time as the outcome measures. Varying recovery periods were proposed based on the type and severity of injury or surgery. Surveys of the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, the Police, insurance companies in the United Kingdom and Orthopaedic Surgeons offered a variety of opinions.

There is currently insufficient evidence for any authoritative body to determine fitness to drive. The lack of guidance could result in patients being withheld from driving for longer than is necessary, or returning to driving while still unsafe.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:290–4.