Variations in pelvic anatomy are a major risk factor for misplaced percutaneous sacroiliac screws used to treat unstable posterior pelvic ring injuries. A better understanding of pelvic morphology improves preoperative planning and therefore minimises the risk of malpositioned screws, neurological or vascular injuries, failed fixation or malreduction. Hence a classification system which identifies the clinically important anatomical variations of the sacrum would improve communication among pelvic surgeons and inform treatment strategy. 300 Pelvic CT scans from skeletally mature trauma patients that did not have pre-existing posterior pelvic pathology were identified. Axial and coronal transosseous corridor widths at both S1 and S2 were recorded. Additionally, the S1 lateral mass angle were also calculated. Pelvises were classified based upon the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) height using the midpoint of the anterior cortex of L5 as a reference point. Four distinct types could be identified: Type-A – SIJ height is above the midpoint of the anterior cortex of the L5 vertebra. Type-B – SIJ height is between the midpoint and the lowest point of the anterior cortex of the L5 vertebra. Type-C – SIJ height is below the lowest point of the anterior cortex of the L5 vertebra. Type-D – a subgroup for those with a lumbosacral transitional vertebra, in particular a sacralised L5. Differences in transosseous corridor widths and lateral mass angles between classification types were assessed using two-way ANOVAs. Type-B was the most common pelvic type followed by Type-A, Type-C, and Type-D. Significant differences in the axial and coronal corridors was observed for all pelvic types at each level. Lateral mass angles increased from Types-A to C, but were smaller in Type-D. This classification system offers a guide to surgeons navigating variable pelvic anatomy and understanding how it is associated with the differences in transosseous sacral corridors. It can assist surgeons’ preoperative planning of screw position, choice of fixation or the need for technological assistance.
Total knee replacement (TKR) design aims to restore normal kinematics with emphasis on flexion range. The survivorship of a TKR is dependent on the kinematics in six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DoF). Stepping up, such as stair ascent is a kinematically demanding activity after TKR. The debate about design choice has not yet been informed by 6-DoF in vivo kinematics. This prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT) compared kneeling kinematics in three TKR designs. 68 participants were randomised to receive either cruciate retaining (CR-FB), rotating platform (CR-RP) or posterior stabilised (PS-FB) prostheses. Image quality was sufficient for 49 of these patients to be included in the final analysis following a minimum 1-year follow-up. Patients completed a step-up task while being imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy. Femoral and tibial computer-aided design (CAD) models for each of the TKR designs were registered to the fluoroscopic images using bespoke software OrthoVis to generate six-degree-of-freedom kinematics. Differences in kinematics between designs were compared as a function of flexion. There were no differences in terminal extension between the groups. The CR-FB was further posterior and the CR-RP was more externally rotated at terminal extension compared to the other designs. Furthermore, the CR-FB designs was more posteriorly positioned at each flexion angle compared to both other designs. Additionally, the CR-RP design had more external femoral rotation throughout flexion when compared with both fixed bearing designs. However, there were no differences in total rotation for either step-up or down. Visually, it appears there was substantial variability between participants in each group, indicating unique patient-specific movement patterns. While use of a specific implant design does influence some kinematic parameters, the overall patterns are similar. Furthermore, there is high variability indicating patient-specific kinematic patterns. At a group level, none of these designs appear to provide markedly different step-up kinematic patterns. This is important for patient expectations following surgery. Future work should aim to better understand the unique patient variability.
An MRI-derived subject-specific finite element model of a knee joint was loaded with subject-specific kinetic data to investigate stress and strain distribution in knee cartilage during the stance phase of gait in-vivo. Finite element analysis (FEA) has been widely used to predict the local stress and strain distribution at the tibiofemoral joint to study the effects of ligament injury, meniscus injury and cartilage defects on soft tissue loading under different loading conditions. Previous studies have focused on static FEA of the tibiofemoral joint, with few attempts to conduct subject-specific FEA on the knee during physical activity. In one FEA study utilising subject-specific loading during gait, the knee was simplified by using linear springs to represent ligaments. To address the gap that no studies have performed subject-specific FEA at the tibiofemoral joint with detailed structures, the present study aims to develop a highly detailed subject-specific FE model of knee joint to precisely simulate the stress distribution at knee cartilage during the stance phase of the gait cycle.Summary Statement
Introduction
Anatomical variations in hip joint anatomy are associated with both the presence and location of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis (OA). Variations in hip joint anatomy can alter the moment-generating capacity of the hip abductor muscles, possibly leading to changes in the magnitude and direction of ground reaction force and altered loading at the knee. Through analysis of full-limb anteroposterior radiographs, this study explored the hypothesis that knees with lateral and medial knee OA demonstrate hip geometry that differs from that of control knees without OA.Summary
Introduction
