Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 425 - 425
1 Dec 2013
Meneghini M Lovro L Smits S Ireland P
Full Access

Introduction:

Although commonly used, the clinical performance of highly crosslinked polyethylene in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains unknown and concerns exist regarding fatigue resistance and oxidation, particularly in posterior-stabilized (PS) designs. The purpose of this study is to compare highly crosslinked and conventional polyethylene in a PS TKA design at a minimum of 5-years.

Methods:

A prospective cohort study of 114 consecutive TKAs in 83 patients was performed as a subset of a multi-center prospective study. All TKAs utilized an identical PS design. Conventional polyethylene inserts were used in 50 knees and second-generation highly cross-linked polythethylene inserts were implanted in 64 TKAs. All patients were followed with clinical outcome measures (Short-Form 36, Knee Society Scores, WOMAC and LEAS) and radiographically for a minimum of 5 years.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 400 - 400
1 Dec 2013
Meneghini M Lovro L Licini D
Full Access

Introduction:

Although cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) is well accepted, the optimal femoral component design remains unknown. Among early complications, loosening and periprosthetic fracture persist and are related to implant design. The purpose of this study is to compare the anatomic fit and early subsidence of two different stem designs: a modern, short taper-wedge design and a traditional fit-and-fill design.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study of 129 consecutive cementless THAs using two different femoral stems was performed. A modern taper-wedge stem was used in 65 hips and a traditional proximal fit-and-fill stem was used in 64 hips. Radiographic analysis was performed at preoperative, immediate postoperative and 1-month postoperative intervals. The radiographic parameters of bone morphology via the canal-flare index, implant subsidence at 1 month, sagittal alignment, and the “anatomic fit” metrics of canal fill and associated gaps were measured and recorded.