Guided growth is commonly performed by placing an extra-periosteal two-hole plate across the growth plate with one epiphyseal and one metaphyseal screw. Recent work by Keshet et al. (2019) investigated the efficacy of the removal of the metaphyseal screw only (“sleeper plate”) after correction. They concluded the practice to be unnecessary as only 19% of patient show recurrence of deformity. The aim of this study is to examine the incidence of rebound and undesired bony in-growth of the plate (“tethering”) after metaphyseal screw removal only.

In this retrospective case series, patient data on 144 plates inserted around the knee was obtained. Plates still in situ (n=69) at time of study and full hardware removal (n=50) were excluded. The remaining 25 plates had a metaphyseal screw only removed after deformity correction. We analyzed the rate of re-bound, tethering and maintenance of correction in two age groups at latest follow-up for a mean of 3.5 years (1.25 to five). Fisher's exact test with Freeman-Halton extension was used to analyze the two by three contingency table.

Twenty-five plates were identified as “sleeper plates” in our series. 13 plates (52%) maintained the achieved correction after a mean of 21 months (four to 39), nine plates (36%) required screw re-insertion due to rebound after a mean of 22 months (12-48) from screw removal, and four plates (16%) showed tethering with undesired continuation of guided growth after a mean of 14 months (seven to 22) from screw removal. Younger patients (years at time of plate insertion) had higher rates of rebound and tethering (p=.0112, Fisher's exact test). All Tethering occurred in titanium plates, none occurred in steel plates.

The sleeper plate is an acceptable treatment strategy for coronal deformities around the knee. Rebounding and tethering are potential outcomes that occur in younger patients and should be disclosed to patients; titanium plates may increase the risk of tethering, however further long-term follow-up is needed. We stress the importance of close post-operative follow up to identify tethering early and prevent over correction.

The sleeper plate technique is a viable option in younger children with congenital abnormalities, however, continued monitoring of alignment is necessary after screw removal to check for rebound and tethering.

Aims

To report early (two-year) postoperative findings from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating disease-specific quality of life (QOL), clinical, patient-reported, and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) with a second-generation uncemented trabecular metal (TM) glenoid versus a cemented polyethylene glenoid (POLY) component.

Supracondylar fractures of the humerus (SCH) are the most common fractures sustained following a fall on an outstretched hand in healthy children, and one of the leading causes of hospital admission and surgical intervention. With increasing severity of injury, treatment options become more invasive and the potential for long lasting complications increases. The aim of this study is to examine the causes and circumstances surrounding SCH in public play spaces particularly to determine whether or not the playground equipment implicated in injurious falls is compliant with Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standards.

Children aged 6–12 years who sustained SCH while playing at a public play space between 2017 and 2019 were recruited from the paediatric orthopaedic clinic. Public playgrounds within a 50 km radius of the clinic were visited by research assistants. Using GPS coordinates from photographs taken by the children at the site of injury or play structures identified by the children using Google Maps, play structure type, dimensions, height of fall, and the type and depth of the surface material were collected from each site and compared to the relevant CSA standard.

Of the 89 SCH injuries reported during the recruitment period, 49 (55%) occurred on public play structures. Thirty-nine injury sites, representing 42 SCH cases, were accessible to conduct site visits and were included in the analysis. Thirteen children (31%) sustained Type One, 19 (45%) were Type Two, and 10 (24%) were Type Three SCHs. The mean child age at injury was 7.13 years. Of the 42 SCH cases, 37 sites had woodchips surfacing (88%); three had rubber (7%), one had cement (2%), and one had sand (2%). Of the 36 sites where woodchip depth measurements could be obtained, only seven (19%) met the minimum CSA depth. Out of the 42 SCH cases, 29 injuries (69%) involved upper body equipment (i.e. monkey bars or similar) and track rides. Fourteen of these 29 injuries (48%) occurred on structures that did not meet CSA standards for fall height. All rotating play structures had less than half of the required clearance between the components.

Eighty-six percent of SCH cases occurred in playgrounds where at least one of the required CSA standards was not met. Woodchip surfacing was of particular concern because 81% of woodchip surface depths failed to meet CSA standards. Of the 14 injuries where fall height did not meet CSA standards, 11 (79%) also did not meet minimum CSA surface depth. Field investigation into the characteristics of playgrounds in which children sustain SCH can guide preventative policy and practice measures. Municipalities and school boards should be alerted to the need for regular maintenance of woodchip playground surfacing, in order to remain compliant with the minimum surface depth and prevent serious injuries. Additionally, compliance with minimum surface depths can also decrease fall heights to meet CSA standards. By minimizing the prevalence of SCH injuries occurring on play structures and the need for emergency department visits, the burden to healthcare systems and families of injured children can potentially be reduced.

Glenoid failure remains the most common mode of total shoulder arthroplasty failures. Porous tantalum metal (Trabecular Metal™, Zimmer) have grown in popularity in hip and knee arthroplasty. First-generation porous tantalum metal-backed glenoid components demonstrated metal debris, resulted in failure, and were revised to second-generation glenoid implants. Evidence for second-generation porous tantalum metal implants in shoulder arthroplasty is sparse.1–4 The purpose of this study was to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes in a series of patients with second-generation porous tantalum glenoid components at a minimum two-years postoperative.

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients who received a second-generation porous tantalum glenoid component anatomic shoulder arthroplasty between May 2009 and December 2017 with minimum 24 months follow-up. The shoulder arthroplasties were performed by one of two senior fellowship-trained surgeons. We collected postoperative clinical outcome indicators: EQ5D visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, and Constant Score (CS). Radiographic review was performed by an independent fellowship-trained surgeon. The Endrizzi metal debris grading system1 was utilized to grade metal debris. We computed descriptive statistics and compared outcome scores between groups via the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test, with group-wise comparisons defined by: metal debris and humeral head migration (secondary analyses).

Thirty-five patients [23 male (65.7%) and 12 female (34.3%)] with 40 shoulder replacements participated in the study. Forty of 61 shoulders (65.6%) had an average of 64 ± 20.3 months follow-up (range 31 to 95). Average BMI was 27.5 ± 4.4 kg/m2 (range 19.5 to 39.1). The average postoperative EQ5D VAS at final follow-up was 74.6 ± 22.5, WOOS Index 87.9 ± 16.6, ASES Score 88.3 ± 10.9, and CS 80.4 ± 13. At final follow-up, 18 of 40 shoulders (45%) had metal debris [15 of 40 (37.5%) Endrizzi grade 1 and three of 40 (7.5%) Endrizzi grade 2], and 22 of 40 shoulders (55%) did not show evidence of metal debris. There was one non-revision reoperation (open subscapularis exploration), one shoulder with anterosuperior escape, three shoulders with glenoid radiolucencies indicative of possible glenoid loosening, and nine shoulders with superior migration of the humeral head (>2mm migration at final follow-up compared to immediate postoperative). When comparing postoperative scores between patients with vs without metal debris, we found no statistically significant difference in the EQ5D VAS, WOOS Index, ASES Score and CS. On further analyses, when comparing superior migration of the humeral head and postoperative outcomes scores, we found no statistically significant difference.

We report the longest published follow-up with clinical and radiographic outcomes of second-generation porous tantalum glenoid anatomic shoulder arthroplasties. In this series of patients, 45% of total shoulder arthroplasties with a second-generation porous tantalum glenoid implant had radiographic evidence of metal debris. This metal debris was not statistically associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. Further investigation and ongoing follow-up are warranted.