Distal femur fractures (DFF) are common, especially in the elderly and high energy trauma patients. Lateral locked osteosynthesis constructs have been widely used, however non-union and implant failures are not uncommon. Recent literature advocates for the liberal use of supplemental medial plating to augment lateral locked constructs. However, there is a lack of proprietary medial plate options, with some authors supporting the use of repurposing expensive anatomic pre-contoured plates. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a readily available cost-effective medial implant option.

A retrospective analysis from January 2014 to June 2022 was performed on DFF (primary or revision) managed with supplemental medial plating with a Large Fragment Locking Compression Plate (LCP) T-Plate (~$240 AUD) via a medial sub-vastus approach. The T-plate was contoured and placed superior to the medial condyle. A combination of 4.5mm cortical, 5mm locking and/or 6.5mm cancellous screws were used, with oblique screw trajectories towards the distal lateral cortex of the lateral condyle. All extra-articular fractures and revision fixation cases were allowed to weight bear immediately. The primary outcome was union rate.

This technique was utilised on sixteen patients; 3 acute, 13 revisions; mean age 52 years (range 16-85), 81% male, 5 open fractures. The union rate was 100%, with a median time to union of 29 weeks (IQR 18-46). The mean follow-up was 15 months. There were two complications: a deep infection requiring two debridements and a prominent screw requiring removal. The mean range of motion was 1–108^o.

Supplemental medial plating of DFF with a Large Fragment LCP T-Plate is a feasible, safe, and economical option for both acute fixation and revisions. Further validation on a larger scale is warranted, along with considerations to developing a specific implant in line with these principles.

Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) are devastating complications. Our knowledge on hip fractureassociated hemiarthroplasty PJI (HHA-PJI) is limited compared to elective arthroplasty. The goal of this study was to describe the epidemiology, risk factors, management, and outcomes for HHA-PJI.

A population-based (465,000) multicentre retrospective analysis of HHAs between 2006-2018 was conducted. PJI was defined by international consensus and treatment success as no return to theatre and survival to 90 days after the initial surgical management of the infection. Univariate, survival and competing risk regression analyses were performed.

1852 HHAs were identified (74% female; age:84±7yrs;90-day-mortality:16.7%). Forty-three (2.3%) patients developed PJI [77±10yrs; 56% female; 90-day-mortality: 20.9%, Hazard-Ratio 1.6 95%CI 1.1-2.3,p=0.023]. The incidence of HHA-PJI was 0.77/100,000/year and 193/100,000/year for HHA. The median time to PJI was 26 (IQR 20-97) days with 53% polymicrobial growth and 41% multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO). Competing risk regression identified younger age [Sub-Hazard-Ratio(SHR) 0.86, 95%CI 0.8-0.92,p<0.001], chronic kidney disease (SHR 3.41 95%CI 1.36-8.56, p=0.01), body mass index>35 (SHR 6.81, 95%CI 2.25-20.65, p<0.001), urinary tract infection (SHR 1.89, 95%CI 1.02-3.5, p=0.04) and dementia (SHR 9.4, 95%CI 2.89-30.58,p<0.001) as significant risk factors for developing HHA-PJI. When infection treatment was successful (n=15, 38%), median survival was 1632 days (IQR 829-2084), as opposed to 215 days (IQR 20-1245) in those who failed, with a 90-day mortality of 30%(n=12). There was no significant difference in success among debridement, excision arthroplasty or revision arthroplasty.

HHA PJI is uncommon but highly lethal. All currently identified predictors are non-modifiable. Due to the common polymicrobial and MDRO infections our standard antibiotic prophylaxis may not be adequate HHA-PJI is a different disease compared to elective PJI with distinct epidemiology, pathogens, risk factors and outcomes, which require targeted research specific to this unique population.

INTRODUCTION

The risk of dislocation in large diameter metal on metal hip replacement is significantly lower than in standard THR. This is due to the increased primary arc, increased jump distance and possibly a suction effect. Our unit has performed over 1500 of these cases with an overall revision rate of <1%. We report a case series of dislocations in 5 large diameter metal on metal hips undertaken at our unit.

Introduction- Proximal humeral fractures remain a challenging problem. Most authors agree that anatomical reduction and stable fixation are essential to allow early range of motion. A variety of techniques have been described such as threaded pins, tension band wiring, screws, nails, plates and primary prosthesis. Locking plates score over other implants by the virtue of providing greater angular stability and better biomechanical properties. The Aim of the Study is to evaluate the functional outcome of PHILOS plate Osteosynthesis of displaced proximal humeral fractures.

Materials and Methods- A retrospective study of 50 patients treated with PHILOS plating for the 2 part, 3part and 4 part proximal humeral fractures with a minimum follow up of 1 year. All the patients were assessed in clinic by Constant Murley and ASES scoring systems. X-ray evaluation was done for fracture healing, AVN, mal-union, non-union, collapse of head, screw penetration and impingement of plate.

Results- Total of 50 acute displaced fractures of proximal humerus treated with PHILOS plating between 2003–2005 were assessed. Mean age was 64 years (15–86) Male to female ratio was 12:38, dominant to non-dominant ratio was 32:18. According to Neer’s classification 16 fractures were 2 part, 24 fractures were 3 part and 10fractures were 4 part. The overall mean Constant score was 73.4(range20–100) and ASES score was 71.7(range 25–98). Under 60 years of age the mean Constant and ASES scores were 83.5 and 83, over 60 years of age scores were 63.1 and 60.4 respectively. The complications include two deep infections which needed excision arthroplasty, one malunion, one subacromial impingement which needed plate removal after fracture healing. No mechanical failure, no non-union, no ANV was noted.

Conclusions- PHILOS plate Osteosynthesis is a reliable method of treating complex proximal humeral fractures. It provides good mechanical stability and allows rapid mobilization with out compromising fracture healing.

Purpose of study: ALL is the commonest childhood malignancy and current survival rates reach 80%. Consequently adverse effects of therapy may have significant long-term implications. Treatment is risk stratified with the higher intensity regimens B and C receiving more Dexamethasone and Methotrexate, both of which are known to have significant bony effects. The skeletal morbidity associated with ALL and its treatment, particularly AVN, is being increasingly identified. AVN is rare in paediatric practice. Its pathophysiology is largely unknown, although it is probably related to corticosteroid use.

Method: The records of a series of 7 out of 53 children treated with chemotherapy for ALL as per MRC ALL 99/01 and ALL 2003 protocols in a single tertiary paediatric oncology centre were reviewed. All 7 cases (3 male) had MRI confirmation of AVN (2 normal x-rays). All cases had been treated on higher intensity chemotherapy regimens and were at least 6 months from commencement of anti-leukaemic therapy. All presented with transient limb pain.

Results: The AVN was multi-focal (median 4 sites) and was associated with significant other bony abnormalities, including joint collapse, fracture, osteomyelitis and septic arthritis. In this series the dose of steroids did not correlate with the severity of the AVN. Treatment options were limited with all cases receiving conservative treatment

Conclusions: Careful consideration must precede a recommendation to stop steroids as this may compromise leukaemic cure. Although the long-term consequences of AVN on bone health are unknown, we recommend a high index of suspicion in professionals who are treating these children to ensure prompt diagnosis.

Objective: To investigate the clinical outcomes, and the requirement of surgery following selective nerve root block performed for cervical radicular pain in patients with MRI proven disc pathology.

Methods: Thirty consecutive patients with cervical radiculopathy and correlating MRI pathology were studied. Mean age of patient was 46yrs (range 28–64yrs). Twenty nine of the thirty patients also complained of associated neck pain. All underwent fluoroscopically guided, selective cervical nerve root block with steroid (20mg Depomedrone) and local anaesthetic (0.5ml Bupivo-caine 0.25%). Radiographic contrast was used to confirm needle position. All procedures were conducted by the same clinician.

Pre and post procedure pain and physical function scores were noted using the standard SF 36 questionnaire, as well as whether subsequent surgery was required. Mean follow up time was seven months (range 2–13 months).

Results: 81% of patients reported an improvement in arm pain, and 66% in neck pain following the procedure. 77% of patients had an improvement in pain score (mean improvement 16 points). 68% of patients had an improvement in physical function score (mean improvement 20 points). At the time of follow up only one patient had undergone surgery for cervical radicular pain.

Conclusion: This study suggests that fluoroscopically guided selective nerve root block is a clinically effective interventional procedure in the management of cervical radicular pain, and may prevent the need for open surgery.

Aim: To compare and assess the quality of nursing care provided to acute trauma patients that have been admitted to trauma wards and non-trauma outlying wards.

Design: Multi-centre comparison, questionnaire study undertaken in three large hospitals in South Wales. The study compares the knowledge of qualified trauma nurses, based on trauma wards and non-trauma nurses, based on outlying wards.

Method: 100 qualified trauma nurses and 170 qualified non-trauma nurses were asked to independently complete a questionnaire. The questions included the nursing management of common fractures and post operative conditions. The completed questionnaires were marked and the results analysed.

Results: 100% of the questionnaires were completed and returned. The trauma nurses conveyed the importance of ice (85%) and elevation (97%) in the initial management of limb fractures. This compares with ice (10%) and elevation (50%) on the outlying wards. Trauma nurses correctly monitor for potentially devastating post operative complications and compartment syndrome 87% of the time compared with 42% on outlying wards. Spinal injuries are managed appropriately 88% of the time on trauma wards compared with 36% on outlying wards.

Conclusion: Trauma patients receive optimum nursing care when admitted to a trauma ward and are nursed by trauma nurses. They probably have a shorter hospital stay. Many of the out-lying wards provide sub-optimal trauma nursing care and a few are positively dangerous.

Recommendations: We believe that hospital trusts should train nurses to confidently and competently be able to nurse outlying patients. Until that time, we recommend that trauma patients should not be nursed by non-trauma nurses.