Introduction

New implants for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are frequently introduced with the promise of improved performance. Infrequently there is accompanying data to document relative performance. The goal of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of an implant widely used for decades (Existing TKA), compared to a new implant (New TKA) from the same manufacturer.

Introduction

With the introduction of new technology in orthopaedics, surgeons must balance anticipated benefits in patient outcomes with challenges or complications associated with surgical learning curve for the technology. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the surgeon learning curve with a new multi-radius primary TKA system (primary TKA implant and instruments) designed for surgical team ease would impact clinical outcomes, surgical time and complications.

With the introduction of new technology in orthopaedics, surgeons must balance anticipated benefits in patient outcomes with challenges or complications associated with surgical learning curve for the technology. The purpose of this study was to determine whether surgeon learning curve with a new multi-radius primary TKA system and instruments designed to improve surgical team ease would impact clinical outcomes, surgical time, and complications.

From November 2012 to July 2015, 2369 primary TKAs were prospectively enrolled in two multicentre studies across 50 sites in 14 countries with a new knee system (NEW-TKA) evenly balanced across four configurations: cruciate retaining or posterior stabilised with either fixed bearing or rotating platform (CRFB, CRRP, PSFB, PSRP). 2128 knees had a<1 year visit and 1189 had a minimum 1 year visit. These knees were compared to a reference dataset of 843 primary TKAs from three manufacturers in the same four configurations with currently available products (CA-TKA). Demographics for NEW-TKA and CA-TKA were similar and typical for primary TKA. Operative times, clinical outcomes and a series of five patient reported outcomes were compared for NEW-TKA vs. CA-TKA. The first 10 New-TKA subjects for each surgeon were defined as learning curve cases (N=520) and were compared to all later subjects (N=1849). Patient reported outcome measure and clinical outcome analyses were covariate adjusted for patient demographics, pre-op assessment and days post-op.

Mean (SD) surgical time for NEW-TKA learning curve cases was 79.1 (24.3) minutes, which reduced thereafter to 73.6 (24.3) (p=0.002). Beyond 10 cases, there was a continued reduction in NEW-TKA surgical time (R-Squared = 0.031). After 10 cases, surgical time was on par with the mean (SD) 71.9 (21.6) for CA-TKA (p=0.078). PROM outcomes of the first 10 learning curve cases for NEW-TKA were not statistically different from later cases at less than 1 year or later when adjusted for relevant covariates including configuration, patient demographics, pre-op functional status, and time post-op (p-values > 0.01). PROM outcomes for NEW-TKA vs. CA-TKA under the same covariate adjustments showed a trend favoring KOOS ADL, Symptoms, and Sport and Recreation subscores at minimum 1 year (p-values < 0.01). The incidence of intraoperative operative site complications was 1.3% for the NEW-TKA learning curve cases which was similar to the 0.6% rate for historical CA-TKA (p=0.231) and the intraoperative complication rate for the NEW-TKA later cases was consistent with learning curve cases (p=0.158).

The introduction of new implants into the market place needs to have adequate data to support that they are safe and effective. Except for a minor increase in surgical time during the first 10 patients, this study found that surgeon learning curve with this new primary TKA system does not adversely affect patient short term outcomes and complication rates.

INTRODUCTION

There is ongoing debate about the possible advantages of unicompartmental (UNI) knee replacement versus total knee replacement (TKR), such as for young, active patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate functional, radiographic, and device survivorship outcomes of UNI knee replacement with a newer generation UNI through 2-years post-op.