Previous fluoroscopic studies compared total knee arthroplasty (TKA) kinematics to normal knees. It was our hypothesis that comparing TKA directly to its non-replaced controlateral knee may provide more realistic kinematics information. Using fluoroscopic analysis, we aimed to compare knee flexion angles, femoral roll-back, patellar tracking and internal and external rotation of the tibia. 15 patients (12 women and 3 men) with a mean age of 71.8 years (SD=7.4) operated by the same surgeon were included in this fluoroscopic study. For each patient at a minimum one year after mobile-bearing TKA, kinematics of the TKA was compared to the controlateral knee during three standardized activities: weight-bearing deep-knee bend, stair climbing and walking. A history of trauma, pain, instability or infection on the non-replaced knee was an exclusion criteria. A CT-scan of the non-replaced knee was performed for each patient to obtain a 3-D model of the knee. The Knee Osteoarthitis Outcome Score (KOOS) was also recorded.Introduction
Material and methods
Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) implants are used to restore function to individuals whose shoulder motions are impaired by osteoarthritis. To improve TSA implant designs, it is crucial to understand the kinematics of healthy, osteoarthritic (OA), and post-TSA shoulders. Hence, this study will determine in vivo kinematic trends of the glenohumeral joints of healthy, OA, and post-TSA shoulders. In vivo shoulder kinematics were determined pre and post-operatively for five unilateral TSA subjects with one healthy and a contralateral OA glenohumeral joint. Fluoroscopic examinations were performed for all three shoulder categories (healthy, OA, and post-TSA) for each subject shoulder abduction and external rotation. Then, three-dimensional (3D) models of the left and right scapula and humerus were constructed using CT scans. For post-operative shoulders, 3D computer-aided design models of the implants were obtained. Next, the 3D glenohumeral joint kinematics were determined using a previously published 3D to 2D registration technique. After determining kinematics, relative Euler rotation angles between the humerus and scapula were calculated in MATLAB® to determine range of motion (ROM) and kinematic profiles for all three shoulder categories. The ROMs for each category were compared using paired t-tests for each exercise. Also, the location of the contact point of the humerus on the glenoid was found. This allowed the vertical translation from the most superior to most inferior contact point (SI contact range) to be calculated as well as the horizontal translation from the most anterior to most posterior contact point (AP contact range). The SI and AP contact ranges for all shoulder categories were compared using paired t-tests for each exercise.INTRODUCTION
Methods
