Aims

Hemiarthroplasty of the hip is usually carried out through either a direct lateral or posterior approach. The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine any differences in patient-reported outcomes between the two surgical approaches.

This review summarises the evidence for the treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. Results from randomised clinical trials and national register studies are presented when available.

The advantages of arthroplasty compared with internal fixation are supported by several studies. A number of studies contribute to the discussions of total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus hemiarthroplasty and unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty, but no clear-cut evidence-based recommendation can be made. THA may be particularly advantageous for active, lucid patients with a relatively long life expectancy. For patients who are physiologically older, hemiarthoplasty is probably satisfactory, and for the oldest patients with more comorbidities, unipolar implants are considered to be sufficient. If the hospital can support emergency THA surgery in sufficient numbers and quality, there may be few patients who warrant bipolar hemiarthroplasty.

The direct lateral approach reduces the risk of dislocation compared with the posterior approach. Cemented implants lower the risk of periprosthetic fracture and its subsequent morbidity and mortality. As the risk of peri-operative death related to bone cement can be reduced by adequate measures, cemented implants are recommended in fracture cases.

Take home message: There remains a great variation in the surgical management of patients with a hip fracture, and an evidence-based approach should improve the outcomes for this vulnerable patient group.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:291–7.

Background

In Sweden approximately 6000 patients yearly sustain displaced femoral neck fractures. During the last decade there has been a shift towards more arthroplasties at the expense of internal fixation. In 2008 approximately 75% of the dislocated femoral neck fractures in Sweden were treated with arthroplasties. Those patients are typically elderly and frail and the vast majority of them receive hemiarthroplasties. In 2005 a national hemiarthroplasty registration was established as part of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR).

Introduction: During the last decade the treatment regime for dislocated femoral neck fractures has switched towards more arthroplasties. There has been apprehensions regarding long-term results for arthroplasties. The opinion has been put forward that preserving the femoral head is preferable to performing total hip arthroplasty.

Methods: 409 of the 450 patients in a randomized study 1995–97 had valid follow-up at 4 months, 1, 2, 5, and 10 years (or until deceased). Mentally intact, independently living and walking patients over 70 years were included and randomized to osteosynthesis (n=217) or arthroplasty (n=192).

Results: After 10 years 168 patients (77 percent) were deceased and there were 99 failures (46 percent) in the osteosynthesis group. In the arthroplasty group 145 patients (76 percent) were deceased and there were 17 failures (9 percent) after 10 years. Both groups had the same rate of failure between 2 and 10 years.

There was significantly better results regarding pain and function in the arthroplasty group at 4 months. At 10 years the results were still not superior for osteosynthesis.

A Cox regression analysis regarding sex, age, time to surgery, smoking, osteoporosis, trauma type, preoperative function and choice of skin incision comparing the patients without hip complications at 10 years with the patients with failures in each group revealed no risk factor for failure.

Discussion: Arthroplasty for hip fracture show a reliable long-term result while osteosynthesis leads to a high rate of complications and is not superior regarding pain and function even when successful. Both methods have the same mortality.

Background: Hemiarthroplasty of the hip is a common procedure, but information about implants and outcome is scarce. In Sweden the number of hemiarthroplasties has increased from 200 in 1998 to 4181 in 2007.

Material and Methods: Nationwide registration started in 2005. 100% of the hospitals participates, and 96% of the hemi-procedures are registrered. An analysis of 12 245 cases operated 2005–07 is presented.

Results: In the Register the mean age at surgery is 84 years (SD 7.0, 73% female). 93% are operated due to acute fracture and 6% due to failed internal fracture fixation. Cemented fixation has been used in 92% and a posterior approach in about half of the cases (52%). The Lubinus and Exeter stems are most common (41 and 23%). The Austin-Moore design has decreased from 9 to 2% during the study period.

3.2% of the patients (hips) have been reoperated, most commonly because of dislocation. Multiple reoperations are common. Male gender, secondary procedure and uncemented stem are associated with increased reoperation risk with 1.2, 1.7 and 1.8 times (1.2, CI: 1.0–1.6; 1.7, 1.3–2.3; 1.8 1.4–2.5). Use of uncemented fixation resulted in increased risk of reoperation, also with exclusion of uncemented Austin-Moore prostheses (1.8 times, 1.1–2.8).

In a separate analysis of the two most frequent designs, use of bipolar head increased the risk of revision twice (1.4–2.8) compared to unipolar head when adjusting for other risk factors. This may reflect that fitter and more active individuals get a bipolar prosthesis and are more prone to become revised should complications occur or a true increase of complications when using bipolar head. A further analysis is in progress.

Use of dorsal approach (1.6, 1.2–2.2), Austin-Moore (1.8, 1.1–3.1) and Thompson prostheses (1.8, 1.5–2.8) increased the risk of revision because of dislocation.

Summary: When treating fracture patients with hemi-arthroplasty we recommend that a well documented cemented implant with different off-set options should be used via an anterolateral approach. Use of bipolar heads may increase the risk of revision.

In a series of 450 patients over 70 years of age with displaced fractures of the femoral neck sustained between 1995 and 1997 treatment was randomised either to internal fixation or replacement. Depending on age and level of activity the latter was either a total hip replacement or a hemiarthroplasty. Patients who were confused or bed-ridden were excluded, as were those with rheumatoid arthritis. At ten years there were 99 failures (45.6%) after internal fixation compared with 17 (8.8%) after replacement. The rate of mortality was high at 75% at ten years, and was the same in both groups at all times. Patient-reported pain and function were similar in both groups at five and ten years. Those with successfully healed fractures had more hip pain and reduction of mobility at four months compared with patients with an uncomplicated replacement, and they never attained a better outcome than the latter patients regarding pain or function.

Primary replacement gave reliable long-term results in patients with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck.

Between 1999 and 2005, 10 264 patients who had undergone total hip replacement (THR) for subcapital fracture of the hip were compared with 76 520 in whom THR had been performed for other reasons. All the cases were identified through the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. The THRs performed as primary treatment for fracture were also compared with those done after failure of internal fixation.

After seven years the rate of revision was higher in THR after fracture (4.4% vs 2.9%). Dislocation and periprosthetic fracture were the most common causes of revision. The risk was higher in men than in women. The type of femoral component and the surgical approach influenced the risk. After correction for gender, type of component and the surgical approach the revision rates were similar in the primary and secondary fracture THR groups.

Total hip replacement is therefore a safe method for both the primary and secondary management of fracture of the hip.