The aim of this abstract is to show that acute osteomyelitis is one of the most feared complication of orthopedic surgery. A rapid and aggressive treatment is mandatory in order to avoid significant bone loss, joint destruction and, in most cases, salvage of the limb. After apparent cure of the infection, sequelae must be addressed. In this case, the joint destruction was important, so reconstruction procedures where impossible. In a superficial and relatively small joint such as the elbow, it is preferred to do an arthrodesis than an arthroplasty because the risk of reactivation of the infection with implant involvement is very important.

We present a case report of a 69 years old woman, who had a supra-intra-condylar fracture (AO 13-C1) of the right humerus. She was treated with open reduction and internal fixation with 2 internal lag screws and 2 external lag screws. After 6 weeks, she was admitted with a dislocated elbow associated with pain, loss of limb function, cubita nerve palsy and a purulent discharge from the surgical wound. She started vancomycin and was submitted to surgery with debriment, hardware removal and fixation with an external fixator was used. The local signs of infection disappeared progressively. After normalization of the laboratory parameters of infection, the patient was submitted to an elbow arthrodesis using a posterior contour plate.

The elbow achieved solid fixation and infection was eradicated, at least for the time being, allowing the patient to use the upper limb in her daily live activities.

The treatment of post operative acute osteomyilits is challenging, In this case, after apparent solution of the infection, a solid fixation of the elbow was achieved, allowing the use of the upper limb in the patient daily activities.

The aim of this abstract is to show that when dealing with an infected non-union, all possibilities of treatment must be considered in order to choose the best treatment plan for each patient. This case shows the evolution of an infected non-union following type III open fractures which, after the used of several methods that failed, had to be solved with amputation.

We present a case report of a 41 years old man, with a type IIIA open fracture of the right tibia and fibula. Initially, he was treated with an external fixator, which was removed and plate implanted. After this, he who presented to us with an infected non-union. He was submitted to surgery, the plate was removed and a circular external fixator was used. Six months later, the external fixator was removed and a reamed intramedullary nail was implanted with bone graft from iliac crest. One year later, the facture site was still mobile, so he was submitted to fixation with internal plate. As this last method also failed, a bellow knee amputation was performed, 4 years after the initial event.

After several attempts with several distinctive methods, the infected non-union had to be solved with the sacrifice of the limb.

The treatment of infected non-union is one of the most difficult in Orthopedic Surgery. There are several procedure that can be used. When all these fail, amputation and consequent limb prosthetic substitution, might allow the patient to return to the society.