Occlusal loading and muscle forces during mastication aids in assessment of dental restorations and implants and jaw implant design; however, three-dimensional bite forces cannot be measured with conventional transducers, which obstruct the native occlusion. The aim of this study was to combine accurate jaw kinematics measurements, together with subject-specific computational modelling, to estimate subject-specific occlusal loading and muscle forces during mastication.

Motion experiments were performed on one male participant (age: 39yrs, weight: 82kg) with healthy dentition. Two low-profile magnetic sensors were fixed to the participant's teeth and the two dental arches digitised using an intra-oral scanner. The participant performed ten continuous of chewing on a polyurethane rubber sample of known material properties, followed by maximal compression (clenching). This was repeated at the molars, premolars of both the left and right sides, and central incisors. Jaw motion was simultaneously recorded from the sensors, and finite element modelling used to estimate bite force. Specifically, simulations of chewing and biting were performed by driving the model using the measured kinematics, and bite force magnitude and direction quantified. Muscle forces were then evaluated using a rigid-body musculoskeletal model of the patient's jaw.

The first molars generated the largest bite forces during chewing (left: 309 N, right: 311 N) and maximum-force biting (left: 496 N, right: 495 N). The incisors generated the smallest bite forces during chewing (75 N) and maximum-force biting (114 N). The anterior temporalis and superficial masseter muscles had the largest contribution to maximum bite force, followed by the posterior temporalis and medial pterygoid muscles.

This study presents a new method for estimating dynamic occlusal loading and muscle forces during mastication. These techniques provide new knowledge of jaw biomechanics, including muscle and occlusal loading, which will be useful in surgical planning and jaw implant design.

Total temporomandibular joint (TMJ) replacements reduce pain and improve quality of life in patients suffering from end-stage TMJ disorders, such as osteoarthritis and trauma. Jaw kinematics measurements following TMJ arthroplasty provide a basis for evaluating implant performance and jaw function. The aim of this study is to provide the first measurements of three-dimensional kinematics of the jaw in patients following unilateral and bilateral prosthetic TMJ surgeries.

Jaw motion tracking experiments were performed on 7 healthy control participants, 3 unilateral and 1 bilateral TMJ replacement patients. Custom-made mouthpieces were manufactured for each participant's mandibular and maxillary teeth, with each supporting three retroreflective markers anterior to the participant's lip line. Participants performed 15 trials each of maximum jaw opening, lateral and protrusive movements. Marker trajectories were simultaneously measured using an optoelectronic tracking system. Laser scans taken of each dental plate, together with CT scans of each patient, were used to register the plate position to each participant's jaw geometry, allowing 3D condylar motion to be quantified from the marker trajectories.

The maximum mouth opening capacity of joint replacement patients was comparable to healthy controls with average incisal inferior translations of 37.5mm, 38.4mm and 33.6mm for the controls, unilateral and bilateral joint replacement patients respectively. During mouth opening the maximum anterior translation of prosthetic condyles was 2.4mm, compared to 10.6mm for controls. Prosthetic condyles had limited anterior motion compared to natural condyles, in unilateral patients this resulted in asymmetric opening and protrusive movements and the capacity to laterally move their jaw towards their pathological side only. For the bilateral patient, protrusive and lateral jaw movement capacity was minimal.

Total TMJ replacement surgery facilitates normal mouth opening capacity and lateral and inferior condylar movements but limits anterior condylar motion. This study provides future direction for TMJ implant design.

Falls in adults are a major problem and can lead to injuries and death. In order to better understand falls and successful recoveries, identifying kinematics, kinetics, and muscle forces during recovery from loss of balance is crucial. To obtain reactive gait patterns, participants must be subjected to unexpected perturbations such as trips and slips. Previous researchers have reported kinetics recovery data following stumbling; however, the muscle force recovery patterns remain unknown. To better target exercises to reduce the risk of falls, we must first understand which muscles, their magnitude, and their coordination patterns, play a role in a successful recovery from a trip and a slip. Additionally, knowing the successful patterns of lower limb function can help with the diagnosis of faulty movements.

A total of 20 healthy adults in their twenties with similar athletic backgrounds were perturbed on a split-belt treadmill using Computer-Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (Motkforce Link) at a preset speed of 1.1m/s. Two kinds of perturbations were administered: slip and trip. Slips were simulated by accelerating one belt, whereas trips were simulated by decelerating one belt. Both perturbations had similar intensity and only differed in the direction. Computational modeling was used to obtain lower-limb function during the compensatory step. SPM paired t-test was used to compare differences in recovery strategies between slip and trip through magnitude and patterns of joints.

There were no significant differences in joint angles post tripping vs post-slipping. Results of net joint moments showed that compensating for the loss of balance due to tripping required a higher ankle plantarflexion moment than slipping (at 22-52%; 1.2± 0.3vs0.4±0.2, p<0.001). Additionally, larger gluteus maximus (at 40-50%;8.7±3.8vs2.7±1.1N/kg, p=0.001), gluteus medius (at23~33%; 22.6±5.7vs6.8±3.6N/kg, p<0.001) were generated than post-slipping, respectively.

These findings suggested that greater GMAX and GMED forces are required post-trip recovery than slip. Future analysis of trip recovery showed the importance of ankle joint in recovering from forward and backward fall. These results can be used as references in remote diagnosis of joint and muscle weakness and assessment of the risk of falls with the use of accelerometers.