Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 4 of 4
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 253 - 253
1 Jul 2008
DUBOUSSET J CHARPAK G DORION R LAVASTE F SKALLI W DEGUISE J KALIFA G FEREY S
Full Access

Purpose of the study: The objective of this work was to achieve a whole-body 3D study of the bone and joint system in the upright position using the lowest radiation dose possible. Radiation doses can be considerable when acquiring 3D images using computed tomographic millimetric sections which in addition are acquired uniquely in the reclining position and thus limited to a specific region.

Material and methods: Using a gas detector which transforms x-ray protons into electrons (G. Charpak) we constructed a device which enables acquisition of high-quality anteroposterior and lateral whole-body radiographic images with exposure to radiation doses 8 to 10-fold less than classical 2D x-rays. A 3D reconstruction of the entire skeleton was obtained from these two initial images.

Results: The 3D reconstructions were validated and compared with those obtained with computed tomography. The results were concordant and revealed least equivalent to if not better reliability. The advantage was to enable study in the functional upright position an to study weight-bearing joints of the lower-limbs, pelvis, and spine. In addition, radiation exposure for the 3D reconstructions was reduced 800 to 1000 times compared with computed tomography. More than 150 examinations have been performed and validated in patients with diverse pathological conditions as well as in normal control adults and children.

Discussion: There is a very wide potential field of application for this technique in orthopedics, both for 3D analysis of joint deformations and their impact on the whole body, and for therapeutic follow-up, particularly after prosthetic or corrective surgery. For example, the horizontal plane which is very difficult to image and represent mentally for spinal surgery can be clearly planned and controlled. This new imaging technique offers perspectives for intraoperative navigation and for bone mineral density measurements. The double-energy methodology enables short-term evaluation of fracture risk due to osteoporosis of the spine and limbs or pelvis.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 252 - 252
1 Mar 2004
Migaud H Trichard T Gougeon F Diop A Skalli W Lavaste F
Full Access

Aims: This study compared in vivo kinematics of a posterior stabilized TKA inserted either with a fixed (FBC) or with a mobile bearing component (MBC). Methods: Ten patients with unilateral previously defined TKA were selected among 150 TKA performed in 2000 by a single surgeon according to the following criteria: primary TKA because of osteoarthritis, controlateral knee free of clinical symptoms, patient < 80, TKA flexion > 90°, knee IKS score > 80/100. Ten TKA (10 patients) were selected differing only by the adjunction of the mobile bearing (5 MBC and 5 FBC). The range of the 3 knee rotations (flexion, axial rotation, varus-valgus) were assessed by means of a 6-degree freedom electromagnetic goniometer during: level walking, rising from a chair, non weight-bearing flexion. Non-parametric tests compared motions between TKA and contro-lateral knee and between MBC and FBC. Results: FBC had a better mobility that MBC in valgus-varus, which was related to a larger frontal laxity. According to the increase in frontal laxity, FBC demonstrated better axial rotations that MBC in non-weight-bearing (NS). However, better ranges of axial rotation were recorded in MBC in weight-bearing (p< 0.05) (MBC axial rotation exceeded by 10° the motions of FBC). In patients with MBC, there was no difference in range of motion between the TKA and the controlateral healthy knee. In the FBC group the range of axial rotation was lower in the TKA by comparing with the controlateral knee (p< 0.05). Conclusion: With a unique prosthetic design our study suggests the role of MBC to reproduce a physiological range of axial rotation in weight-bearing. The MBC better reproduced knee kinematics Shoulder instability


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 26 - 26
1 Jan 2004
Bacon P Watier B Lavaste F Vital J
Full Access

Purpose: The biomechanical behaviour of the cervical spine was studied in vitro with an optoelectronic system in order to better understand its physiology.

Material: Twenty fresh cervical spines (occiput-D1) from fourteen men and six women, mean age 66.5 years, were sterilised with ß radiation (2.5 Mrad) and stored at −24°C then studied after slow thawing and excision of the paraspinal muscles.

Methods: Three-point reflecting markers were rapidly attached to each vertebral segment (4 or 5 vertebrae). The inferior vertebra was blocked. Six pure moment couples (2 N.m maximum, 10 increments) were applied in the three anatomic planes using a loading device lodged on the superior vertebra. Displacements were measured with the VICON 140 using a kinematic software.

Results: The three-dimensional behaviour curves of each functional unit (FU) were recorded for each solicitation to analyse the principal movement and coupled movements (maximum mobility, neutral zones, rigid zones, rigidity). Mean maximal flexion-extension movements were C0/C1= 28.7°; C1/C2 = 22.3°; C2/C3 = 7.3°; C3/C4 = 10.6°; C4/C5 = 13.8°; C5/C6 = 13.4°; C6/C7 = 10.8°; C7/T1 = 6.4°. Maximum overall lateral inclinations were: C0/C1= 8.7°; C1/C2 = 9.3°; C2/C3 = 8.7°; C3/C4 = 6.7°; C4/C5 = 10.5°; C5/C6 = 12.2°; C6/C7 = 8.6°; C7/T1 = 5.7°. Maximal overall axial rotations were: C0/C1= 11°; C1/C2 = 71°; C2/C3 = 9.5°; C3/C4 = 10.8°; C4/C5 = 12.3°; C5/C6 = 9°; C6/C7 = 5.6°; C7/T1 = 5.7°. All the FU exhibited flexion-extension movement. Lateral inclination coupled important controlateral rotation for C1/C2 and minimal ipsilateral rotation (< 10°) in the lower FU of the cervical spine. Axial rotation of the C1/T1 functional unit was coupled with homolateral rotation (< 10°).

Discussion: Our experimental protocol provided precision of < 1° and good reproducibility allowing simultaneous three-dimensional analysis of the spinal functional units. Making measurements without direct contact is particularly useful for the cervical spine. Our results are within the experimental corridor defined by Goel, Panjabi and Wen.

Conclusion: This work on a large number of functional units adds further support to data in the literature concerning the biomechanical behaviour of the cervical spine. Our protocol could be applied to analyse the impact of surgical procedures used for the cervical spine, particularly for the evaluation of new fixation systems or prostheses.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 54 - 54
1 Jan 2004
Trichard T Migaud H Diop A Skall W Lavaste F Gougeon F
Full Access

Purpose: Use of a mobile tibial plateau for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is designed to reduce wear and improve prosthetic kinetics. The purposes of this study were: 1) to compare the kinetics of a posterior stabilised TKA implanted with a fixed plateau (FP) or a mobile plateau (MP) and, 2) to determine whether the mobile plateau improves axial rotation.

Material and methods: Ten patients with a unilateral TKA (HLS) with a fixed or mobile plateau were selected for this study according to the following criteria: arthroplasty for degenerative knee disease, healthy contralateral knee, age < 80 years, pain-free prosthesis, IKS > 80/100, flexion > 90°, follow-up > 1 year. There were five patients with a fixed plateau and five patients with the same prosthesis except with a mobile plateau. Knee movement (flexion-extension, axial rotation, valgus-varus) were measured with an electromagnetic goniometer on the implanted and healthy sides. Four movements were recorded: walking, standing up sitting down, flexion-extension without loading. Amplitudes were compared with non-parameteric statistical tests between the healthy side and the implanted side and between the two types of implants

Results: The FP knees were more mobile in valgus-varus due to greater residual frontal laxity than the MP knees. This extra laxity generated excessive axial rotation on the FP during non-loaded movements. Conversely, when loaded, axial rotation of the MP knees was 10° greater (mean, p < 0.05) than for the FP knees, giving better stability in the frontal plane. This study did not demonstrate any difference in flexion between FP and MP. Patients with an MP prosthesis did not have significantly different amplitudes of the three movements for the healthy versus implanted knee. For the patients with a FP prosthesis, axial rotation and frontal plane movement was lower in the implanted knee than in the healthy knee (p< à.05).

Discussion: This study devoted to the design of a single prosthesis demonstrated the usefulness of the mobile plateau for axial rotation during loaded movement. The kinetics of MP prostheses is similar to that of the healthy knee. Better axial rotation with MP prostheses during loaded movements suggests the persistence of the plateau mobility which should be confirmed with a cinematographic study.