Sarcomas are rare malignant tumors of mesenchymal origin and primarily occur in children, adolescents and young adults. With multimodal treatment concepts survival has significantly improved and is now in the range of 60–70 %. Following relapse or metastasis, however, the prognosis still is poor as is also the case for patients presenting with primary disseminated disease. TranSaR-Net aims to develop novel treatment strategies overcoming tumor cell resistance directed against novel targets. To achieve this goal the German pediatric, adolescent and adult sarcoma research groups have formed a collaborative network linking the nationwide and European trial groups with access to over 90 % of all pediatric and adolescent sarcoma patients and a large number of adult sarcoma patients to basic and translational sarcoma research groups. Within TranSaRNet a registry for patients at relapse is established as target cohort for innovative treatment strategies as well as a biomaterial banking network in order to facilitate the availability of tumor and other biomaterial for basic and translational research. A joint bioinformatics platform will integrate existing array data, to standardize laboratory and evaluation procedures and for modeling new theoretical concepts in a joint effort. Within the basic and translational research work packages, the sarcoma research groups in Germany have coordinated their research activities in a joint effort. The basic research work package (WP1) includes projects on genomic (WP1.1) and epigenetic (WP1.2) tumor characterization as well as identification of the tumor initiating cell (WP1.3) and resistance mechanisms (WP1.3 und 1.4), and the identification of new targets in apoptotic pathways (WP1.4, 2.4) and tumor-induced angiogenesis (WP1.5). The translational research work package (WP2) is focused on innovative immunological treatment strategies including sarcoma specific T-cells (WP2.1), dendritic cells (WP2.2), NK- cells (WP2.4) and tumor imaging (WP2.3).

A brief overview of the projects will be provided.

Purpose: To compare the torsional stability provided by five implant stems with different cross-sectional geometries under cyclic loading.

Methods: Cemented stems with five different cross-sectional shapes – circular, oval, triangular, rectangular with rounded edges (round rectangular), and rectangular with sharp edges (sharp rectangular) – were custom machined from stainless steel. Stem dimensions were selected to fit within the humeral canal (based on a 6mm x 8mm dimensioning scheme) and shapes were based on commercially available-designs. Seven specimens of each stem shape were tested. ||The stems were potted in square aluminum tubes using bone cement, and allowed to cure for 24 hours prior to testing. A materials testing machine and a custom designed loading fixture were used to apply torsion to the stems. A sine wave loading pattern was applied until ultimate failure (5° of stem rotation) was reached. This loading pattern had a lower bound of 0.9Nm and an upper bound that started at 4.5Nm and was increased in increments of 2.25Nm every 1500 cycles. The load was cycled at 2Hz. Statistical analyses on both the number of cycles and torque to failure were performed using one-way ANOVAs followed by post-hoc Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) tests (p< 0.05).

Results: Overall, ANOVAs showed an effect of shape on the number of cycles (p< 0.0001) and torque to failure (p< 0.001). SNK tests revealed the sharp rectangular stem provided the greatest resistance to torque (p-cycles< 0.001; p-torque< 0.001) compared to all other stems. Other significant differences resulted in the following ranking of the shapes: sharp rectangular, round rectangular, triangular, and circular = oval.

Conclusions: The results of this study agree with static testing previously conducted on the same set of stem shapes. Although the sizes of the stems were chosen to roughly replicate upper limb implants, these results may be extrapolated to larger stems such as for the hip or knee. To improve implant longevity, it is important that the best fixation possible be obtained through all available avenues, including improved cementing techniques, and optimal implant designs. An alteration in implant stem shape may assist in achieving this goal.