The presentation of musculoskeletal disease differs in men and women, and recognition of the differences between men and women's burden of disease and response to treatment is critical to optimizing care. In this presentation, I will discuss the expanding evidence in the literature that examine the role of sex and gender in musculoskeletal disease, including how its examination increases the innovations and contributions, as well as expands the knowledge about musculoskeletal disease, conditions, and injury in a broad sense. We will discuss the role that structural anatomy differences, hormones, and genetics play in differential disease expression, to the historical biases in the subject populations of clinical and basic research projects. Participants will be provided with examples and opportunities to evaluate orthopaedic science through a sex and gender lens, and what impact this may play in setting the stage for both clinical practice and scientific investigation.
Lack of standardization of outcome measurement has hampered an evidence-based approach to clinical practice and research. We report on the progress on establishing a minimal set of core domains for outcome measurement in distal radius fracture. Participants included an expert panel of orthopaedic surgeons, outcome researchers, patients, physiotherapists, industry representatives involved in distal radius research and partners in regulatory affairs. Decisions were made by review of evidence and theory and establishing group consensus.Introduction
Materials and methods