Background

Advances in diagnosis and treatment should mean that hindquarter amputation is now rarely needed. Unfortunately this is not the case. We have performed 166 of these amputations in the past 36 years. We have investigated the reasons why this procedure is still required and the outcomes following it.

Since 1970, 2200 primary endoprosthetic replacements have been carried out at our Unit for bone tumours. 3% were carried out in the 1970s, 21% in the 1980s, 33% in the 1990s and 43% since 2000.

The most common diagnosis was osteosarcoma (839)(38%) followed by metastatic disease (18%) and chondrosarcoma (13%). The most common site was the distal femur (35%) followed by the proximal femur and proximal tibia. The least common sites were the scapula and distal radius. The mean age at operation was 35 but varied widely, being 19 in patients with osteosarcoma and 58 for those with metastases. 239 extendable prostheses were inserted in children. 50% of the patients were alive at 10yrs and 42% at 20yrs. 7% required an amputation either for local recurrence or infection.

The failure rate of the prostheses varied by age and site, with pelvic and proximal tibial replacements having the highest risk of infection and proximal humeral replacements the lowest risk of any complication. The failure rates of the most common prostheses (distal femur and proximal tibia) have improved over time and are now ~ 1.5% per year. Hydroxyapatite collars have largely resolved the problem of aseptic loosening. Silver coated prostheses have been used in 48 complex cases with encouraging results in controlling infection. Functional scores averaged 80% and were the same for revision as for primary implants.

Background

Subtalar fusion is traditionally an open procedure with potentially significant complications but there is little published on arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis.

Aim: To prospectively determine whether social deprivation has an effect on the level of disability at presentation and the outcome from total knee replacement (TKR).

Method: A prospective outcome study was carried out between 1992 and 1996, recruiting over 2500 total knee replacements. All patients were assessed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postop using the Knee Society (KS) scores for clinical evaluation and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) to measure general health status. The Townsend Score was used as the index of social deprivation and was calculated for each patient on the basis of their address.

Results: There was no significant difference between either the Knee Society or NHP scores at baseline and the Townsend Score. This indicated that social deprivation has no effect on the level of the knee arthritis immediately prior to joint replacement, both in terms of patient disability and health status.

There was also no significant difference between either the Knee Society or NHP scores postoperatively and the Townsend Score. This indicated that social deprivation has no effect on the outcome from knee replacement.

Conclusion: This study shows that social deprivation has no significant effect on the level of disability at presentation and the outcome from total knee replacement. This is contrary to previously published reports which have shown worse outcomes in more deprived patients.