Background

Patient reported outcome and experience measures have been a fundamental part of the NHS. We used PROMS2.0, a semi-automated web-based system, which allows collection and analysis of outcome data, to assess the patient reported outcome/experience measures for scarf+/− akin osteotomy for hallux valgus.

In this randomised controlled trial, we evaluated the role of elastic compression using ankle injury stockings (AIS) in the management of fractures of the ankle. A total of 90 patients with a mean age of 47 years (16 to 79) were treated within 72 hours of presentation with a fracture of the ankle, 31 of whom were treated operatively and 59 conservatively, were randomised to be treated either with compression by AIS plus an Aircast boot or Tubigrip plus an Aircast boot. Male to female ratio was 36:54. The primary outcome measure was the functional Olerud–Molander ankle score (OMAS). The secondary outcome measures were; the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS); the Short Form (SF)-12v2 Quality of Life score; and the frequency of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

Compression using AIS reduced swelling of the ankle at all time points and improved the mean OMAS score at six months to 98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 96 to 99) compared with a mean of 67 (95% CI 62 to 73) for the Tubigrip group (p < 0.001). The mean AOFAS and SF-12v2 scores at six months were also significantly improved by compression. Of 86 patients with duplex imaging at four weeks, five (12%) of 43 in the AIS group and ten (23%) of 43 in the Tubigrip group developed a DVT (p = 0.26).

Compression improved functional outcome and quality of life following fracture of the ankle. DVTs were frequent, but a larger study would be needed to confirm that compression with AISs reduces the incidence of DVT.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:1062–9.

Introduction

Long-term ankle pain, stiffness or swelling are frequent following ankle fracture. We investigated whether engineered compression stocking (ECS) influenced functional outcome and quality of life (QoL).

Podiatrists have an important role in providing care in a Foot and Ankle clinic. Most Foot and Ankle Surgeons welcome the assistance they can provide – in a supervised role. Most Trusts should have one Foot and Ankle Surgeon but there are a limited number of trained specialists. Some Trusts have been appointing ‘Consultant Podiatric Surgeons’ – perhaps as a way of addressing this shortfall.

There are potentially a number of concerns amongst Foot and Ankle Surgeons: the public perception of title ‘consultant’; a Non supervised role; Potential to be used as a more cost effective option

We therefore undertook a Questionnaire assessment of patients attending a Foot and Ankle Clinic. Over a six week period 148 patients attended the specialist clinic. Of those 76% responded. 64% were females. The average age range was 45-64. Most patients assumed the Consultant in charge of their care was a qualified medical practitioner (93%) and regulated by the GMC (92%) and who had completed a recognised higher surgical training scheme (93%). Irrespective of suitable experience 2 out of 3 patients stated they would object if the Consultant in charge of their care did not meet the above criteria.

If the patient required surgery 80% stated they would object if the supervising Consultant was not a medically qualified doctor (this was more important in female patients) Interestingly 78% stated they would refuse surgery unless they were under the care of a medically qualified doctor. Very few patients understood the title Consultant Podiatric Surgeon (with those responding assuming they were medical doctors)

This potentially has significant implications in those Trusts employing Consultant Podiatric Surgeons as opposed to Foot and Ankle (Orthopaedic) Surgeons. Unless this differential is clearly explained to the patients there is an issue with informed consent and the potential for litigation.

We have reviewed a series of 56 consecutive patients treated by the Ilizarov circular fixator for various combinations of nonunion, malunion and infection of fractures. We used segmental excision, distraction osteogenesis and gradual correction of the deformity as appropriate.

Treatment was effective in eliminating 40 out of 46 nonunions and all 22 infections. There were two cases of refracture some months after removal of the frame, both of which healed securely in a second frame. Correction of malunion was good in the coronal plane but there was a tendency to anterior angulation, often occurring in the regenerate bone rather than at the original fracture site, after removal of the frame. This was associated with very slow maturation of regenerate bone in some patients, occurring largely, but not exclusively, in those who smoked heavily.

Patients expressed high levels of satisfaction with the outcome, despite relatively modest improvements in pain and function, presumably because their longstanding and intractable nonunion had been treated. None the less, the degree of satisfaction correlated strongly with the degree of improvement in pain and function.

We emphasise the importance of a multidisciplinary team in the assessment and support of patients undergoing long and demanding treatment. The Ilizarov method is valuable, but research is needed to overcome the problems of delayed maturation of the regenerate and slow or insecure healing of the docking site.