The total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective operation for the restoration of the hip function. The number of operations is steadily climbing and is going to reach new heights in the future. The most devastating complication is the deep infection of the joint and has to be treated with a total revision of the prostheses. The risk factors for an infection play a very important role in the preoperative assessment of the patient and for the antibiotic treatment. There are many different opinions on which risk factors are associated with the development of a deep infection in the literature. Our goal was to analyze and find the risk factors, which matter most in the clinical treatment of patients.

We searched the database “PubMed” and “Embase” with the keywords: „(((hip AND infection)) AND (arthroplasty OR replacement)”. With the help of check lists and limits we extracted the most viable studies for our research.

Risk factors associated with a deep infection included the BMI (Body mass index), male gender, prolonged duration of surgery, diabetes mellitus type 2, the ASA (American society of anesthesiologists) score, the Charlson score and the NNIS (National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System) risk index score. Female gender, age and the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis were not associated with deep infections.

Patients with risk factors should be assessed preoperatively and receive an appropriate prophylactic antibiotic treatment, to reduce the risk of a deep infection. With the reduction of their weight and adjustment of the diabetes, patients can reduce the risk for infection by their own. Total hip replacement is still a safe and effective operation and thus should not be withheld from patients.

BACKGROUND

This scientific work is a non-interventional, experimental and prospective comparative study of two very high-viscosity PMMA bone cements: DePuy CMW 2G and Palacos® fast R+G. Reference product: Palacos® R+G.

Fast-setting PMMA bone cements are used in the endoprothetics of the patella and knee (in Australia) and are also used to cement an artificial acetabulum (in the UK). Are there any differences regarding the characteristics of the two fast-setting PMMA bone cements?