Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1011 - 1021
1 Aug 2013
Krishnan H Krishnan SP Blunn G Skinner JA Hart AJ

Following the recall of modular neck hip stems in July 2012, research into femoral modularity will intensify over the next few years. This review aims to provide surgeons with an up-to-date summary of the clinically relevant evidence. The development of femoral modularity, and a classification system, is described. The theoretical rationale for modularity is summarised and the clinical outcomes are explored. The review also examines the clinically relevant problems reported following the use of femoral stems with a modular neck.

Joint replacement registries in the United Kingdom and Australia have provided data on the failure rates of modular devices but cannot identify the mechanism of failure. This information is needed to determine whether modular neck femoral stems will be used in the future, and how we should monitor patients who already have them implanted.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1011–21.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1457 - 1461
1 Nov 2012
Krishnan SP Dawood A Richards R Henckel J Hart AJ

Improvements in the surgical technique of total knee replacement (TKR) are continually being sought. There has recently been interest in three-dimensional (3D) pre-operative planning using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT. The 3D images are increasingly used for the production of patient-specific models, surgical guides and custom-made implants for TKR.

The users of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) claim that they allow the optimum balance of technology and conventional surgery by reducing the complexity of conventional alignment and sizing tools. In this way the advantages of accuracy and precision claimed by computer navigation techniques are achieved without the disadvantages of additional intra-operative inventory, new skills or surgical time.

This review describes the terminology used in this area and debates the advantages and disadvantages of PSI.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 403 - 403
1 Oct 2006
Krishnan SP Skinner JA Carrington RWJ Bentley G
Full Access

Introduction and aim: Several authors have suggested that hyaline repair tissue following autologous – chondrocyte implantation (ACI) gives better clinical results than either mixed hyaline and fibrocartilage or fibrocartilage alone. This data is based on the use of periosteum as a covering membrane in these previous studies. We have for some years been using a porcine collagen type 1/III membrane (ACI-C) instead of periosteum and have now the opportunity to analyze the clinical results when compared with the histology of the repaired defect. We have also analysed the influence on the result of age and sex of the patient, the etiology of the lesion, the duration of the knee symptoms, number of previous knee procedures, the site and size of defect and the preoperative functional scores.

Method: Until 2004, 234 patients underwent autologous chondrocyte implantation at our centre. The patients were assessed clinically by their modified Cincinnati scores prospectively from 1 to 4 years from surgery. Also at arthroscopy (1 to 3 years following ACI-C) they underwent biopsy of the implant where possible and the neo-cartilage was graded as hyaline (H), mixed fibrohyaline (F.H), fibrocartilagenous (F.C) and fibrous (F).

Results: The clinical results showed that older patients had poorer results (p< 0.001) and a high preoperative modified Cincinnati score predicted a good result (p< 0.001). Concerning the cause of the defect, the percentage of patients with excellent and good results were significantly low among those with previously failed ACIs and mosaicplaties (12.5%) compared with those following trauma, osteochondritis dessicans and chondromalacia patellae (67% to 77%). At 4 year follow-up, 75% of patients with hyaline neo-cartilage had excellent and good modified Cincinnati scores whereas those with mixed fibro-hyaline and fibro-cartilage had fewer excellent and good results (44.4% and 54.5% respectively). The other parameters such as gender, the site of defect, duration of knee symptoms and the number of previous procedures and the size of the defect did not significantly influence the outcome. In conclusion, patients most likely to benefit from autologous chondrocyte implantation using a collagen membrane (ACI – C) are younger patients with higher preoperative functional scores and those who develop hyaline neo-cartilage.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 2 | Pages 203 - 205
1 Feb 2006
Krishnan SP Skinner JA Carrington RWJ Flanagan AM Briggs TWR Bentley G

We prospectively studied the clinical, arthroscopic and histological results of collagen-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI-C) in patients with symptomatic osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. The study included 37 patients who were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 4.08 years.

Clinical results showed a mean improvement in the modified Cincinnati score from 46.1 to 68.4. Excellent and good clinical results were seen in 82.1% of those with juvenile-onset osteochondritis dissecans but in only 44.4% of those with adult-onset disease.

Arthroscopy at one year revealed International Cartilage Repair Society grades of 1 or 2 in 21 of 24 patients (87.5%). Of 23 biopsies, 11 (47.8%) showed either a hyaline-like or a mixture of hyaline-like and fibrocartilage, 12 (52.2%) showed fibrocartilage.

The age at the time of ACI-C determined the clinical outcome for juvenile-onset disease (p = 0.05), whereas the size of the defect was the major determinant of outcome in adult-onset disease (p = 0.01).


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 1 | Pages 61 - 64
1 Jan 2006
Krishnan SP Skinner JA Bartlett W Carrington RWJ Flanagan AM Briggs TWR Bentley G

We investigated the prognostic indicators for collagen-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI-C) performed for symptomatic osteochondral defects of the knee.

We analysed prospectively 199 patients for up to four years after surgery using the modified Cincinnati score. Arthroscopic assessment and biopsy of the neocartilage was also performed whenever possible. The favourable factors for ACI-C include younger patients with higher pre-operative modified Cincinnati scores, a less than two-year history of symptoms, a single defect, a defect on the trochlea or lateral femoral condyle and patients with fewer than two previous procedures on the index knee. Revision ACI-C in patients with previous ACI and mosaicplasties which had failed produced significantly inferior clinical results. Gender (p = 0.20) and the size of the defect (p = 0.97) did not significantly influence the outcome.