The aim of this study was to determine whether
obesity affects pain, surgical and functional outcomes following lumbar
spinal fusion for low back pain (LBP). A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was made of
those studies that compared the outcome of lumbar spinal fusion
for LBP in obese and non-obese patients. A total of 17 studies were
included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference in the pain
and functional outcomes. Lumbar spinal fusion in the obese patient resulted
in a statistically significantly greater intra-operative blood loss
(weighted mean difference: 54.04 ml; 95% confidence interval (CI)
15.08 to 93.00; n = 112; p = 0.007) more complications (odds ratio:
1.91; 95% CI 1.68 to 2.18; n = 43858; p <
0.001) and longer duration
of surgery (25.75 mins; 95% CI 15.61 to 35.90; n = 258; p <
0.001). Obese
patients have greater intra-operative blood loss, more complications
and longer duration of surgery but pain and functional outcome are
similar to non-obese patients. Based on these results, obesity is
not a contraindication to lumbar spinal fusion. Cite this article:
We present our experience of 22 patients with low grade degenerative lumbar spondylolysthesis with stenosis (21 Grade I and 1 Grade II) who were treated using new stabilization systems {Scient'x IsoBar TTL Dynamic Rod Stabilization and the Inlign™ Multi-Axial pedicle Screws (Disc Motion Technologies - DMT)}. The pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Score for back pain (VAS-BP) and leg pain (VAS-LP) and functional outcomes using Oswestry Disability Score (ODS). Overall improvement in general patient's health was assessed using the Bodily Pain (SF36-BP) component of the SF -36 questionnaires. Data was analysed with the SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Statistical significance was designated at p < 0.05 and appropriate parametric (Paired sample t-test) and non parametric tests (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) were used. There were 3 male and 19 female patients and average age at operation was 68.95 years (57-79 years). The average duration of follow up was 16.18 months (8-37 months). Most common level of surgery was L4/5 (n=18). Decompression and instrumentation involved 1 level (7 cases), 2 levels (9 cases), 3 levels (1 case) and 4 levels (5 cases). There was statistically significant improvement in all clinical outcomes. The ODS improved from 49.45 ±14.35 pre-operatively to 22.91 ± 6.38 post operatively (p< 0.001). There was statistically significant improvement noted in VAS-BP (p< 0.001), VAS-LP (p<0.001) and SF36-BP (p=0.002).Introduction
Methodology and Results
To examine the relationship between obesity (BMI> 30) and the incidence of peri-operative complications, outcome of surgery and return to work in patients undergoing elective less invasive posterior lumbar inter-body fusion of the lumbar spine for low back pain and leg pain (“LI-PLIF”). 15 patients with BMI> 30 who underwent (“LI-PLIF”) were identified by reviewing the clinical notes and the pre-operative admission sheet from April 2005- to March 2007. All had suffered chronic low back pain for a minimum of 2 years that had proven unresponsive to conservative treatment. All patients underwent pre- and postoperative evaluations for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), short-form 36 (SF-36), and visual analogue scores (VAS). Minimum follow-up was for 12 months. Blood loss was dependent on BMI, number of levels, and surgical time. Post operative complication was more in the morbidly obese group than the in the obese. 10 patients (66.6%) returned to their normal pre-operative employment within the 12 months of the index procedure. There was a significant improvement in the ODI and in the VAS for back pain. Length of hospital stay was a mean of 3.3 days Although surgery is technically more demanding our experience with less invasive posterior inter-body fusion has shown less incidence of post operative complication, less intra-operative blood loss and short in-patient hospital stay. We conclude that a high BMI should not be a contraindication to surgery in patients with degenerative low back pain. Ethics approval: None: Audit Interest Statement None
The aim of this study is to review the functional outcome of the patients treated with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for FBSS. This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 39 patients diagnosed with FBSS and treated with PLIF between June 2000 and December 2008 by the senior author in our unit. Pain and function were evaluated by VAS for Back (VAS-BP) & leg pain (VAS-LP), Oswestry disability index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires, and were completed pre- & post-operatively. There were 39 patients (20 women & 19 men) and mean age at operation was 47.3 years (range of 32 to 76.1 years). Mean duration of follow-up was 39.14 months (range 5.21 -73.5 months). Thirty-one patients were diagnosed as Post laminectomy syndrome and 8 patients as post-discectomy syndrome. The mean pre and post-operative ODI values were 54.13 and 29.14 respectively. The mean pre-operative VAS back and leg pain scores were 7.38 and 6.51 respectively. The mean post-operative VAS for back and leg pain scores were reduced to 4.05 (Pre-op:7.38) and 3.69 (Mean pre-op 6.51)respectively. The mean preoperative SF-36 bodily pain component score was 27.42 and the mean postoperative score was 40.50. Four patients had uncomplicated dural tears that resolved completely. Two patients had superficial wound infection that resolved with oral antibiotics. PLIF is one of the safe and effective treatment option for FBSS and it has shown good results in our series.
Recurrence of back or leg pain after discectomy
is a well-recognised problem with an incidence of up to 28%. Once conservative
measures have failed, several surgical options are available and
have been tried with varying degrees of success. In this study,
42 patients with recurrent symptoms after discectomy underwent less
invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (LI-PLIF). Clinical outcome
was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form
36 (SF-36) questionnaires and visual analogue scales for back (VAS-BP)
and leg pain (VAS-LP). There was a statistically significant improvement
in all outcome measures (p <
0.001). The debate around which
procedure is the most effective for these patients remains controversial. Our results show that LI-PLIF is as effective as any other surgical
procedure. However, given that it is less invasive, we feel that
it should be considered as the preferred option.
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) refers to having persistent back and/or leg pain after one or more surgical procedures aimed at correcting lumbosacral disease. Different modalities including Epidural injections, Spinal cord stimulation, Anterior/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion (ALIF, PLIF) have been described in the literature with varying outcome. Our aim was to review the functional outcome of patients treated with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for FBSS since June 2000 to December 2006. This is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data of 25 patients diagnosed with FBSS and treated with PLIF at University Hospital of North Tees. All patients were requested to fill in the Oswestry Disability Index(ODI), Numerical Rating Scale for Back Pain (NRSBP), Numerical Rating Scale for Leg Pain (NRSLP), SF36 pre and post operatively. The scores were analysed using SPSS software for statistical significance. There were 12 men and 13 women. Mean age was 47.8 years (range 31–76 years). Mean follow up was 24.8 months (range 4 – 63 months). Four of the 25 patients had Post discectomy syndrome while the rest had post laminectomy syndrome. Most common level of surgery was L5/S1 either as a single level or in combination with other levels above. ODI decreased from a pre-op mean of 55.6(range 20–74.1) to 20.6(range 2–54) while VASBP decreased from 6.9 (range 1–9) to 2.2(range 0–6) (p<
0.05) and VASLP decreased from 6.4 (range 3–10) to 2.2 (range 0–7) (p<
0.05). SF36BP scores improved from a mean 26.7 (range 12–37.1) before the surgery to 45 (range 31–62) (p<
0.05) after surgery. 84% of the patients felt that the outcome of the surgery met their expectation and were satisfied with result. Our results show that PLIF can be offered as a safe and effective for treatment of FBSS.
Nine patients with nerve swelling complained of pain with no neurological findings. One responded to a root block and 6 to re-exploration and further decompression. The patients with misplaced screws woke up from surgery with pain and neurology. The pain responded to removal of screws in both. Two patients with loose posterior arches complained of leg pain while lying down only. These symptoms disappeared after excision of the arches. In 2 patients conjoint roots were found intra-operatively. Both developed post operative pain, which settled down in one. In one patient subsidence of an iliac graft caused pain a few months following surgery and did not respond to further decompression.
The incidence of cement leakage can be reduced by the use of high viscosity cement, use of a low pressure injection system, injecting small volumes at each level, introducing the cement under visualization and waiting for cement to set before withdrawing the needle.
After satisfactory placement of the Jamshidi needle (used for injecting cement), aspiration is attempted using a 20ml Syringe. A slurry, made of very fine pieces of Gel foam mixed with Omnipaque dye and saline, is injected into the vertebral body. This embolizes the blood channels, which are communicating with the needle. Once no more blood can be aspirated, and no dye is seen extruding into the veins, toothpaste consistency cement is injected under low pressure and fluoroscopic guidance. A post-procedure CT scan was performed in all cases to confirm cement location.
Previous clinical studies have studied tibiofibular torsion by measuring the angular difference between a proximal (often bicondylar) plane and a distal bimalleolar plane. We measured the angular difference between the proximal and distal posterior tibial planes as defined by ultrasound scans. We found no significant torsional difference between the right and left tibiae of 87 normal children, nor between their different age groups. The mean external torsion of 58 legs with congenital talipes equinovarus was 18 degrees; significantly less than the mean 40 degrees in the normal children and 27 degrees in the clinically normal legs of the 22 patients with unilateral congenital talipes equinovarus. We did not confirm the previously reported increase in external torsion with increasing age. The relative internal tibial torsion we have demonstrated in patients with congenital talipes equinovarus must be differentiated from the posterior displacement of the distal fibula observed by others and which may result from manipulative treatment. The relative internal tibial torsion we found in the clinically normal legs of children with congenital talipes equinovarus is further evidence that in this condition the pathology is not confined to the clinically affected foot.