Whiplash vertigo syndrome is often seen in victims of rear-end vehicle collisions. These patients commonly complain of headache, vertigo, tinnitus, poor concentration, irritability, and sensitivity to noise and light.

Sixteen patients (medium age, 39,5 years) that they refered in orthopaedic examination because of long-lasting subjective complaints after cervical spine injury underwent clinical, laboratorial and psychometric examinations. The mean posttraumatic interval was 43 months. Ten patients were injured in road accidents, 5 during sports and one at work, all with mechanism trial of whip. Each patient was evaluated with otorhinolaryngologic examination, audiometry tests, CT: petrus – internal auditory meatus and cerebellopontine corner. Also each patient was evaluated with neurologic examination, psychological well-being scale (sf-36), and personality profile scale.

None of the patients had neurologic symptoms, and no lesions of the cervical spine were identified. All the patients had negative clinical, radiological and standard laboratorial control, but may be is a critical point that the eleven of these patients had pathologic OGTT (Oral Glucose Tolerance Test). Also did not exist differentiations from the mean values in psychological well-being scale (SF-36), and personality profile scale of healthy population. Test results were unrelated to the length of the post-traumatic interval. However, 2 distinct syndromes were identified. Ten patients had cervicoencephalic whiplash type syndrome (CES), characterized by headache, vertigo, tinnitus poor concentration, and disturbed adaptation to light intensity. Six patients had the lower cervical spine whiplash type syndrome (LCSS), characterized by vertigo, tinnitus cervical and cervicobrachial pain.

The verification of Whiplash Vertigo syndrome require more objective clinical means. This article proposes that exists an organic base for the syndrome, but does not promote that whiplash injury certainly cause it

Introduction: The chevron osteotomy is an accepted method for the correction of mild and moderate hallux valgus and generally advocated for patients younger than the age of sixty years. In the current work the finite element analysis applied to calculate the stress (force per unit area) on different cuts in the metatarsal bone model of the first ray in the human foot.

Material and Methods: The cuts have the form of a simple angle with 90 degrees ‘modified chevron osteotomy’, 60 ‘typical chevron osteotomy’ 70, 50 and 30, openings correspondingly, and share a common corner C, which is at the centre of a circle that fits the head of the metatarsal. In order to calculate the maximum stresses on the cuts, the bone is assumed to be with a 150 angle to the floor, which is the angle that it takes during the push-off phase.

Results: The calculations show a considerable difference on the stress distribution on the differnt cuts. In particular in the ‘90 degrees cut’ the normal (to the cut) stress is much larger than the shear stress. The opposite is true for the 60 cut. Since shear stresses are the ones that cause material failure, it is predicted that the 90 cut will heal much faster than the 60 cut. The nodes along the cuts where the normal and the shear stress were calculated in different osteotomies.

Conclusion: The FEM analysis confirm our clinical results of this modified chevron osteotomy of 90 degrees. The osteotomy site is firmly secured, avoiding early displacement of the lateral fragment and give earlier fusion.