Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 358 - 358
1 Jul 2011
Tsarouhas A Iosifidis M Kotzamitelos D Spyropoulos I Chrysanthou C Giakas I
Full Access

To evaluate in-vivo the effectiveness of the double bundle technique for Anterior Cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in restoring knee rotational stability under varying dynamic loading conditions.

The study group included 10 patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings tendon autograft, 12 patients with single-bundle reconstruction, 10 ACL deficient subjects and 12 healthy control individuals. Kinematic and kinetic data were collected using an 8-camera optoelectronic motion analysis system and one force plate. Knee rotational stability was examined during two maneuvers: a combined 60o pivoting turn and immediate stairs ascend and a combined stairs descend and immediate 60o pivoting maneuver. The two factors evaluated were the maximum

There were no significant differences in tibial rotation between the four groups in the examined maneuvers. Tibial rotation in the single- and the double-bundle groups were even lower than the control group. Rotational moments did not differ significantly between the four groups in any of the examined maneuvers. In general, rotational moments in the affected side of the ACL reconstructed and deficient groups were found reduced compared to the unaffected side.

Double-bundle reconstruction does not reduce knee rotation further compared to the single-bundle technique during dynamic stability testing under varying conditions. The injured side of ACL reconstructed or deficient individuals is exposed to substantially lower rotational moment compared to the intact side.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 367 - 367
1 Jul 2011
Hatzigiammakis A Kotzamitelos D Baburda E Sali H Tilkeridis K Boyiatzis C
Full Access

We estimated the long term results of the different methods in chirurgical treatment of lumbar disk herniation in consideration with the presence or absence of degenerative changes and the grade in witch these factors influence the result of this kind of treatment.

Seventy eight patents with lumbar disk herniation have been submitted in partial discectomy. The men were 42 and 36 women. The patients were separated in tow groups. In the first group [48 patients, 31 of them (A1) without degenerative changes, while the 17 (A2) with degenerative changes], was applied macrodiscectomi. In the second group [30 patients, 18 of them (B1) without degenerative changes and the 12 (B2) with changes], was applied microdiscectomi with use of magnifying lenses. The mean age during operation was 44 years (18–67) and 38 years (24–62) respectively for the tow groups, and the mean time of follow-up was 7 years and 8 months (18 months-13 years). For all patients, the operation was executed from the same surgeon. The elements that were evaluated were the Visual analog scale (VAS, O-10), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), as well as the complications during and after the operation and the cases that required a reoperation.

In the first group VAS score was improved from 9.1 to 3.1 and the ODI score was improved from 86% to 24.2%. In the second group VAS score was improved from 9 to 2.6 and the ODI score was improved from 84.2% to 19.2%. From all patients, subgroup B1 without degenerative changes, which was submitted in microdiscectomy presented the biggest improvement. We have had to reoperate 6 patients (7.8%).

In cases of lumbar disk hernia both methods are appropriate and lead to a considerable improvement of the symptoms. Degenerative changes of the lumbar spine is a factor that leads in less satisfactory results


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 371 - 371
1 Jul 2011
Tilkeridis K Khaleel A Kotzamitelos D Hadzigiannakis A Elliott D Simonis RB
Full Access

We treated 60 patients with type III Pilon fractures (Ruedi and Allgower Classification) between 1996 and 2005. The fractures were distracted and then fixed with an Ilizarov circular ring fixator, without the use of open surgery. No internal fixation was used for the tibia or fibula. No bone grafting was performed.

The average time from injury to frame application was four days. The patient stayed ib frame for a mean time of 15 weeks. No second operative procedure was needed. All cases united in good alignment.

The patients were reviewed from ten years to nine months after frame removal. Four separate evaluations were performed (functional, objective, radiological and an SF-36). The function and the range of movement were better than the radiological assessment suggested.

This method of treatment gives better results with fewer complications than open surgery with internal fixation