We studied the outcomes following arthroscopic primary repair of bucket handle meniscus tears to determine the incidence of re-tears and the functional outcomes of these patients. Prospective cohort study. Over a 4-year period (2016 to 2020), 35 adult patients presented with a bucket handle tear of the meniscus. Arthroscopic meniscal repair was performed using either the all inside technique or a combination of all-inside and inside-out techniques. 15 patients also underwent simultaneous arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Functional knee scores were assessed using IKDC and Lysholm scores.Abstract
Aims
Methodology
Prospective single-surgeon case-series evaluating patients undergoing surgery by this technique. 76 cases (mean age of 33.2 years) who had primary ACL reconstruction with BTB or quadriceps tendon with bone block, were divided into 2 matched groups (age, sex and type of graft) of 38 each based on the method of femoral fixation used (interference screw or adjustable cortical suspension). Patients were followed up clinically and using PROMS from NLR with EQ-5D, KOOS, IKDC and Tegner scores. Complications and return to theatre were noted. Paired two-tailed student t-tests and Chi-square tests were employed for statistical analysis. At a mean follow-up of 82 months, peri-operative mean EQ-5D VAS, EQ-5D Index, KOOS, IKDC and Tegner activity scores showed significant improvement (p<0.05), but no significant difference between the two groups (p>0.05). Mean graft length and diameter was 77mm and 9.3 respectively. Mean interval from injury to surgery was 10.5 months. 18(23.7%) patients had associated meniscal tear with 73.3 % undergoing repair. 10 cases (13.2 %) returned to theatre including, MUA for arthrofibrosis (n=2) and intra-substance graft failure (n=2). 3 cases had to be converted to interference screw fixation due to the tightrope cutting through from the femoral bone block as a result of a technical pitfall.Abstract
Methodology
Results
A paucity of literature exists regarding efficacy of lateral unloader bracing in treatment for pathologies effecting the lateral compartment of the knee. We evaluate patient outcomes following customised lateral unloader bracing (cLUB) in treatment of lateral compartment osteoarthritis (LCOA), lateral tibial plateau fractures (LTPF) and spontaneous osteonecrosis of knee (SONK). Institutional study approval was obtained. All patients undergoing cLUB between January 2013 and January 2021 were included, and prospectively followed-up. Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were assessed at brace fitting and final follow-up. Brace compliance, complications and surgical interventions were also collected. Statistical analysis utilised paired t-test.Abstract
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
In recent years tribological development of knee replacement impants has beeen introduced with several benefits. However, concomitant problems were noticed following widespread use. High-flexion total knee replacement (PFC RPF DePuy) has been developed with a view to improve flexion and the design is expected to have a better patello-femoral biomechanics. However, high secondary patella resurfacing rate has been noticed in the current series. We have retrospectively reviewed 119 knees in 96 patients who underwent RPF knee replacement with selective patellar resurfacing from 2006 to 2010 by the senior author. 71 were performed without primary resurfacing while 48 in knees patella was resurfaced primarily due to significant symptomatic arthritic changes. Majority were females (57 versus 39 males). Average follow-up period was 37 (12-62) months. Twelve (16.9%) knees were subjected to secondary resurfacing due to continuing anterior knee pain. Average time from primary total knee replacement to secondary resurfacing was 18 months (8-35). Most of the patients were satisfied following the secondary resurfacing. Mean Oxford Knee Score in the group where the patella was resurfaced primarily was 33.1 (9-48), in the group where the patella was not resurfaced 32.8 (11-47), in the secondary resurfacing group 31.8 (14-43) and in the revision group 20.5 (16-25). RPF knee replacements in our series have a considerably higher rate of secondary patellar resurfacing as compared with published literature. We recommend primary patellar resurfacing of all RPF knee replacements to avoid this problem. Further analysis of the prosthetic design would be beneficial in relation to clinical outcome. No of patients-96 Total no of knee-118 Av age-66.5 Females-57 Males-39 Patella not resurfaced- 73 Resurfaced-45 Revised-10(13.7%) Revision to TKR (TC3) for different reason-3(2.54%) Average time from primary to secondary resurfacing-
