Recently many implants for ankle arthroplasty have been developed around the world, and especially some mobile bearing, three-component implants have good results. Nevertheless, at our institution fixed two-component, semi-constrained alumina ceramic total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) with TNK Ankle had been performed since 1991 and led to improved outcomes. We report clinical results and in vivo kinematic analyses for TNK Ankle. Between 1991 and 2006, total ankle arthroplasties with TNK Ankle were performed with 102 patients (106 ankles) with osteoarthritis at our institution. There were 91 women and 11 men. The mean age was 69 years and mean follow-up was 5.4 years. These cases were evaluated clinically and radiographically. Besides in vivo kinematics, in TNK Ankle was analysed using 3D-2D model registration technique with fluoroscopic images. Between 2007 and 2008, prospectively ten TAA cases examined with fluoroscopy at postoperative one year.Introduction and aims
Method
We have performed two-component total ankle arthroplasty (TNK ankle) since 1991 and reported good clinical results. However, in vivo kinematics of this implant are not well understood. The purpose of this study was to measure three-dimensional kinematics of total ankle arthroplasty during non-weightbearing and weightbearing activities. Forty-seven patients with a mean age of 71 years were enrolled. Preoperative diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 36 patients and rheumatoid arthritis in 11 patients, and the mean followup was 50 months. Radiographs were taken during nonweightbearing maximal dorsiflexion and plantarflexion, and weightbearing maximal dorsiflexion and plantarflexion. Three-dimensional kinematics were determined using 3D-2D model registration techniques. Anatomic coordinate systems were embedded in the tibial and talar implant models, and they were projected onto the radiographic image. Three-dimensional positions and orientations of the implants were determined by matching the silhouette of the models with the silhouette of the image. From non-weightbearing dorsiflexion to plantarflexion, the talar implant showed 18.1, 0.3, and 1.2 degrees of plantarflexion, inversion, and internal rotation respectively. It also translated 0.8mm posteriorly. There was not significant difference between non-weightbearing and weightbearing kinematics except for the plantarflexion angle (p = 0.007). Posterior hinging, in which tibiotalar contact was seen at only the posterior edge of the talar implant, was observed in 16 patients at either non-weightbearing or weightbearing plantarflexion. There was significantly larger plantarflexion in patients with posterior hinging than patients without hinging (p <
0.001). Nine patients showed anterior hinging at maximum dorsiflexion, and 11 patients showed talar lift-off at maximum plantarflexion. More than half of the patients showed anterior or posterior edge contact, which might cause excessive contact stress and lead to implant failure in the longer term. This phenomenon is due to the difference in rotation axis between the natural ankle and the implant ankle arthroplasty.
