Two-stage re-implantation after infection of Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), remains the gold standard to which other forms of treatment should be compared. The primary purpose of this study was to determine the rates of failure and functional outcome of two stage revision TKA for treatment of infection comparing cemented posterior stabilized compared to constrained condylar implants. The study group included 25 consecutive patients who had two stage revision TKA to treat infection with an average follow up of 3.25 1.5 years (range 2–6). In all patients the diagnosis of infection was made using standard serum parameters as well as aspiration for joint fluid analysis. Eight patients had posterior stabilized TKAs and 17 patients with had constrained condylar TKAs. Clinical evaluation included the Knee Society Knee Scores (KSKS) at each follow-up visit as well as a detailed record of any difficulties or complications.Purpose
Method
Infection following total knee arthroplasty is a devastating complication, requiring considerable effort on the part of the surgeon to eradicate the infection and restore joint function. Two-stage revision is the standard of care in the treatment of peri-prosthetic infection, using a temporary antibiotic-impregnated spacer between procedures. However, controversy remains concerning the use of static versus dynamic spacers, as well as the spacer material. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty in patients treated with a metal-on-polyethylene articulating spacer, as compared to those treated with a static antibiotic-impregnated cement spacer at the same centre. Twenty-seven knees in patients with a mean age of 65 years (range, 40 to 80 years) were treated with two-stage revision of an infected total knee arthroplasty using a metal-on-polyethylene dynamic prosthetic spacer fixed with antibiotic-impregnated cement. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using maximum active knee range of motion, as well as modified Knee Society knee scores and incidence of re-infection at a minimum one-year follow-up. The results were compared to those achieved at similar follow-up in 10 patients treated with a static cement spacer. Demographic profile as measured by age and gender, and pre-operative Knee Society scores and range of motion were similar between the two groups.Purpose
Method
The literature indicates that the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) should be placed in internal rotation not exceeding 18 to the line connecting the geometrical center of the proximal tibia and the middle of the tibial tuberosity. These landmarks may not be easily identifiable intraoperatively. Moreover, an angle of 18 is difficult to measure with the naked eye. The angle at the intersection of lines from the middle of the tibial tuberosity and from its medial border to the tibial geometric center was measured in 50 patients with normal tibia. The geometric center was determined on an axial CT slice at 10mm below the lateral tibial plateau and transposed to a slice at the level of the most prominent part of the tibial tuberosity. Similar measurements were performed in 25 patients after TKA in order to simulate the intra operative appearance of the tibia after making its proximal resection.Purpose
Method
