There is controversy regarding the effect of different approaches on recovery after THR. Collecting detailed relevant data with satisfactory compliance is difficult. Our retrospective observational multi-center study aimed to find out if the data collected via a remote coaching app can be used to monitor the speed of recovery after THR using the anterolateral (ALA), posterior (PA) and the direct anterior approach (DAA).

771 patients undergoing THR from 13 centers using the moveUP platform were identified. 239 had ALA, 345 DAA and 42 PA. There was no significant difference between the groups in the sex of patients or in preoperative HOOS Scores. There was however a significantly lower age in the DAA (64,1y) compared to ALA (66,9y), and a significantly lower Oxford Hip Score in the DAA (23,9) compared to PA(27,7). Step count measured by an activity tracker, pain killer and NSAID use was monitored via the app. We recorded when patients started driving following surgery, stopped using crutches, and their HOOS and Oxford hip scores at 6 weeks.

Overall compliance with data request was 80%. Patients achieved their preoperative activity level after 25.8, 17,7 and 23.3 days, started driving a car after 33.6, 30.3 and 31.7 days, stopped painkillers after 27.5, 20.2 and 22.5 days, NSAID after 30.3, 25.7, and 24.7 days for ALA, DAA and PA respectively. Painkillers were stopped and preoperative activity levels were achieved significantly earlier favoring DAA over ALA. Similarly, crutches were abandoned significantly earlier (39.9, 29.7 and 24.4 days for ALA, DAA and PA respectively) favoring DAA and PA over ALA. HOOS scores and Oxford Hip scores improved significantly in all 3 groups at 6 weeks, without any statistically significant difference between groups in either Oxford Hip or HOOS subscores.

No final conclusion can be drawn as to the superiority of either approach in this study but the remote coaching platform allowed the collection of detailed data which can be used to advise patients individually, manage expectations, improve outcomes and identify areas for further research.

Reduction of length of stay (LOS) without compromising quality of care is a trend observed in orthopaedic departments. To achieve this goal the pathway needs to be optimised. This requires team work than can be supported by e-health solutions. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of reduction in LOS on complications and readmissions in one hospital where accelerated discharge was introduced due to the pandemic.

317 patients with primary total hip and total knee replacements treated in the same hospital between October 2018 and February 2021 were included. The patients were divided in two groups: the pre-pandemic group and the pandemic group. The discharge criteria were: patient feels comfortable with going back home, patient has enough support at home, no wound leakage, and independence in activities of daily living. No face-to-face surgeon or nurse follow-up was planned. Patients’ progress was monitored via the mobile application. The patients received information, education materials, postoperative exercises and a coaching via secure chat. The length of stay (LOS) and complications were assessed through questions in the app and patients filled in standard PROMs preoperatively, at 6 weeks and 3 months.

Before the pandemic, 64.8% of the patients spent 3 nights at hospital, whereas during the pandemic, 52.0% spent only 1 night. The median value changed from 3 days to 1 day. The complication rate before the pandemic of 15% dropped to 9 % during the pandemic. The readmission rate remained stable with 4% before the pandemic and 5 % during the pandemic. No difference were observed for PROMS between groups.

The results of this study showed that after a hip and knee surgery, the shortening of the LOS from three to one night resulted in less complications and a stable rate of readmissions. These results are in line with literature data on enhanced recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty.

The reduction of LOS for elective knee and hip arthroplasty during the pandemic period proved safe. The concept used in this study is transferable to other hospitals, and may have economic implications through reduced hospital costs.

Purpose: to determine the effect of physiotherapy following arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) for impingement syndrome

Methods: 50 patient undergoing ASD with or without excision of the distal clavicle (EDC) were randomized to have physiotherapy (physio group), or mobilize as tolerated and self exercise (no physio group). Patients in the physio group had an average of 7.4 sessions of physiotherapy under the guidance of a physiotherapist. Exercises included scapula stabilizer, passive, active-assisted, active and strengthening exercises developed at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre in Oxford. Patients in the no physio group were encouraged to mobilize their shoulders as tolerated and were given a leaflet with shoulder exercises. Patients were followed-up by postal Oxford shoulder questionnaires at 6 weeks, 3 months 6 months and 1 year. Time to return to work was used as secondary outcome measure.

Results: Our data showed that there was a significant difference between the average Oxford shoulder scores of the two groups at 6 weeks with the no physio group doing better (physio group: 34.3 vs. no physio group: 27.4, p=0.01) No difference was found between the two groups at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year in any of the outcome measures.

Conclusion: Patients not having formal physiotherapy seemed to have done better in the first 6 weeks after surgery with physio patients catching up later resulting in no difference in the final outcome between the groups. New therapy protocols should be developed to see if outcomes can be improved, but physiotherapy may not be necessary after ASD at all.

Introduction: Adequate congruency and primary stability are vital for good long-term results after mosaicplasty. The strength of press-fit stability of the grafts depends upon the length and diameter of the graft, extent of dilation and bone quality. The aim of our study was to quantify the effect of graft diameter and dilation length on the primary stability of single osteochondral grafts against compression and compare the stability of single and multiple osteochondral grafts in an in vitro biomechanical animal model.

Methods: In the single graft series one osteochondral graft was transplanted from the trochlea of porcine femurs to the weight-bearing area of the lateral femoral condyle, while in the multiple graft series three grafts were transplanted in a row or in circular fashion in the same position. We used the MosaicPlasty instruments (Acufex, Smith & Nephew Inc. MA, USA). The specimen was installed on a testing machine (Computer controlled ZWICK FR005TH type tensile machine, Zwick GmbH Ulm, Germany) and the graft was first pushed in level with the surrounding cartilage surface, then it was pushed 3 mm deeper. The push-in forces were measured and the compression curve was registered.

Results: In the case of single 4.5-mm grafts, the mean level push-in force was 43.5 N, pushing 3 mm deeper needed a mean of 92.5 N (n=13). In the case of single 6.5-mm grafts, level push-in needed a mean of 76.2 N, while for pushing 3 mm deeper a mean of 122.2 N force had to be used (n=14). The length of the drill-hole and the dilation were both 20 mm in each setting. When using 20 mm long drill-holes and 15 mm dilation length, the values above were found to be 36.6 N and 122.5 N in the case of 4.5-mm grafts (n=12).

In case of multiple grafting level push-in needed a mean force of 31.8 N in the row series, while pushing 3 mm deeper needed a mean of 52.17 N (n=7). In the circle series level push-in needed a mean of 30.44 N, while for pushing 3 mm deeper a mean of 54.33 N force had to be used (n=9).

Conclusions: These results suggest that grafts of greater diameter are more stable in absolute values and the stability may be increased by shorter dilation length, while level push-in forces do not increase significantly. Multiple grafts may not be as stable as single grafts after transplantation and transplantation in a row or in circular fashion does not influence stability.