The decision to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. Aim of our study was to evaluate the functional difference between patients undergoing medial rotation knee (MRK) replacement with and without patellar resurfacing at our hospital. We did a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing MRK total knee replacement (Matortho) at our hospital between 2008 and 2017 performed by 2 surgeons. Patients were recalled for a clinical review from Oct 2017 for recording of Oxford knee, Baldini and Ferrel scores. Mann-Whitney U test was used for non-parametric data (SPSS v24).Background
Methods
We evaluated the top 13 journals in trauma and
orthopaedics by impact factor and looked at the longer-term effect regarding
citations of their papers. All 4951 papers published in these journals during 2007 and 2008
were reviewed and categorised by their type, subspecialty and super-specialty.
All citations indexed through Google Scholar were reviewed to establish
the rate of citation per paper at two, four and five years post-publication.
The top five journals published a total of 1986 papers. Only three
(0.15%) were on operative orthopaedic surgery and none were on trauma.
Most (n = 1084, 54.5%) were about experimental basic science. Surgical
papers had a lower rate of citation (2.18) at two years than basic science
or clinical medical papers (4.68). However, by four years the rates
were similar (26.57 for surgery, 30.35 for basic science/medical),
which suggests that there is a considerable time lag before clinical
surgical research has an impact. We conclude that high impact journals do not address clinical
research in surgery and when they do, there is a delay before such
papers are cited. We suggest that a rate of citation at five years
post-publication might be a more appropriate indicator of importance
for papers in our specialty. Cite this article:
Septic Arthritis is an important life threatening condition affecting all age groups with a mortality of up to 11%. Our aim was to perform a study of the demographics, length of stay, complications and investigate if time delay of surgical treatment from the time of diagnosis has an impact on mortality and morbidity of the patients. We performed a retrospective study of all the patients presented to our Hospital between 2005 and 2009 with septic arthritis who underwent arthroscopic lavage as definitive intervention. We excluded the patients involving minor joints. Data collection was performed from case notes, microbiology and haematology laboratory results. We divided the patients into three groups based on the time from diagnosis to arthroscopic lavage as T1 (less than 12 hours), T2 (12–24 hours) and T3 (more than 24 hours). Our primary outcome measures were mortality and complications such as Intensive Care Admission. Secondary outcome measures included average length of stay in each group. A total of 57 patients were evaluated. The average age of the patients was 49.7 (10 months–94 years). 2 patients of T1 group died (5.4%) 3 patients of T1 group needed Intensive Care Unit (ICU) management (8.1%). There were no deaths or ICU admissions in the other groups. 40.3% of patients needed arthroscopic lavage more than once. The average length of stay of T1 was 19.8 days, T2–11.5 days and T3–27.5 days. Majority of the joints involved were knees (63.1%).23 patients (40.3%) had a preceding intervention performed in the same joint. Staphyloccus aureus was the most common organism isolated in 14 patients (26.3%).Methods
Results
