Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common cause of hip pain in the young adult. Uncertainty regarding surgical indications, outcome assessment, management preferences and perceptions of the literature exist. We conducted a large international survey assessing the perceptions and demographics of orthopaedic surgeons regarding FAI. A survey was developed using previous literature, focus groups and a sample-to-redundancy strategy. The survey contained forty-six questions and was emailed to national orthopaedic associations and orthopaedic sports medicine societies for member responses. Members were contacted on multiple occasions to increase response rates. Nine hundred orthopaedic surgeons from twenty national and international organisations completed the survey. Surgeons responded across 6 continents, 58.2 % from developed nations with 35.4 % having sports fellowship training. North American and European surgeons reported significantly greater exposure to hip arthroscopy during residency and fellowships in comparison to international respondents (48.0% vs. 44.5% vs. 25.6% respectively; p<0.001). Surgeons performing a higher volume of FAI surgery (over 100 cases per year) were significantly more likely to have practiced for more than 20 years (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.01 to 3.63), be practicing at an academic hospital (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.22 to 4.15), and have formal arthroscopy training (OR 46.17; 95% CI 20.28 to 105.15). High volume surgeons were over two-fold more likely to practice in North America and Europe (OR 2.26; 95% CI: 1.08 to 4.72). The exponential rise in the diagnosis and surgical management for FAI appears to be driven largely by experienced surgeons in developed nations. Our analysis suggests that although FAI management is early in the innovation cycle we are at a tipping point towards wider uptake and utilisation. The results of this survey will help guide further research and study.
The outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the treatment of dysplasia are variable. Historically, arthroscopic treatment of severe dysplasia (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA] < 18°) resulted in poor outcomes and iatrogenic instability. However, in milder forms of dysplasia, favorable outcomes have been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femorocetabular impingement (FAI) in borderline dysplastic (BD) patients compared with a control group of non-dysplastic patients. Between March 2009 and July 2012, a BD group (LCEA 18°–25°) of 46 patients (55 hips) was identified. An age and sex-matched control group of 131 patients (152 hips) was also identified (LCEA 25°–40°). Patient-reported outcome scores, including the Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), the Hip Outcome Score-Activity of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), the Sport-specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), were collected pre-operatively, at 1, and 2 years. The mean LCEA was 22.4 ± 2.0° (range, 18.4°–24.9°) in the BD group and 31.0 ± 3.1° (range, 25.4°–38.7°) in the control group (p<0.001). The mean preoperative alpha angle was 66.3 ± 9.9° in the BD group and 61.7 ± 13.0° in the control group (p=0.151). Cam decompression was performed in 98.2% and 99.3% of cases in the BD and control groups. Labral repair was performed in 69.1% and 75.3% of the BD and control groups respectively, with 100% of patients having a complete capsular closure performed in both groups. At a mean follow-up of 31.3 ± 7.6 months (range, 23.1–67.3) in unrevised patients and 21.6 ± 13.3 months (range 4.7–40.6) in revised patients, there was significant improvement (p<0.001) in all patient reported outcome scores in both groups. Multiple regression analysis did not identify any significant differences between groups. Importantly, female sex did not appear to be a predictor for inferior outcomes. Two patients (4.3%) in the BD group and six patients (4.6%) in the control group required revision arthroscopy during the study period. Favorable outcomes can be expected following the treatment of impingement in borderline dysplastics when labral refixation and capsular closure are performed, with comparable outcomes to non-dysplastic patients. Further follow-up in larger cohorts is necessary to prove the durability and safety of hip arthroscopy in this challenging group and to further explore potential gender-related differences in outcome.
Outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is emerging as a viable alternative to the historically accepted hospital based inpatient TJA in the United States. Several studies have focused on the financial advantages of outpatient TJA, however little research has discussed patient reported outcome measures (PROM) and the overall patient experience. This is a retrospective comparison of PROM data in patients undergoing outpatient vs. inpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA). An internal quality metric database analysis was performed on patients undergoing THA between 2/14/14 to 5/1/2015. Outpatients underwent THA at a newly opened ambulatory surgery center. Inpatients underwent THA in a hospital setting. Ninety-six outpatients and 152 inpatients between the ages of 29–65 years old were included. The Oxford Hip, VAS Pain, and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires were completed pre-operatively, and at 3- and 6-months post-op. The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire asked 8 questions including “how well did the surgery on your joint increase your ability to perform regular activities?” Patients chose from poor, fair, good, very good, and excellent. Chi-squared analyses determined differences in percentages between outpatient and inpatient PROM. Independent samples t-tests determined significant improvements between pre-op and 3 month post-op PROM scores.Introduction
Methods
Outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is emerging as a viable alternative to the historically accepted hospital-based inpatient TJA in the United States. Several studies have focused on the financial advantages of outpatient TJA, however little research has discussed patient reported outcome measures (PROM) and the overall patient experience. The purpose of this study is to compare PROM data in patients undergoing outpatient vs. inpatient total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed in the first year of a newly opened outpatient facility. An internal quality metric database analysis was performed on patients undergoing TKA between 2/14/14 and 5/1/2015. Outpatient TKA was performed at an ambulatory surgery center. Three-hundred and forty-three TKA patients (both inpatient and outpatient) between the ages of 37–65 years old were included. The Oxford Hip, VAS Pain, and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaires were completed pre-operatively, and at 3- and 6-months post-op. The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire asks 8 questions including “how well did the surgery on your joint increase your ability to perform regular activities?” Patients chose from poor, fair, good, very good, and excellent. Chi-squared analyses determined differences in percentages between outpatient and inpatient PROM. Independent samples t-tests determined significant improvements between pre-op and 6 month post-op PROM scores.Introduction
Methods
Computed tomography (CT) can be utilized to design patient specific instruments (PSI) for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The PSI preoperative plans predict bone resection, anterior-posterior implant position, implant rotation and implant size. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperatively predicted implant sizes (tibia and femur) to the actual implanted sizes. Data were compiled from two surgeons, one in the United Kingdom (Surgeon 1, cruciate retaining) and one in the United States (Surgeon 2, posterior stabilizing). Both used the same primary TKA implant systems (Sigma® and Attune®; DePuySynthes®, Warsaw, Indiana). This is the largest comparison of CT-based PSI size accuracy between two implant systems. An international cohort of 396 CT-based PSI-TKA preoperative plans (TruMatch®)were compared to postoperative implant records. Data were retrospectively analyzed for Sigma®(n=351) and Attune® (n=45), both as separate cohorts and as a combined cohort (Sigma® + Attune®). Three analyses were performed: Tibia and femur plan accuracy, major size changes (femoral size change or tibial size change resulting in a femoral size change) and minor size changes (tibial size change not impacting femoral size). Inter-rater reliability analyses using ICC (intra-class correlation) and the Kappa statistic were performed to determine reliability and agreement among the groups. Combined TKA implant data (Sigma® + Attune®) for surgeons 1 and 2 were compared for accuracy between users utilizing different implant designs, cruciate retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilized (PS).Introduction
Methods
Precise knowledge of the Femoral Head (FH) arterial supply is critical to avoid FH avascular necrosis following open and arthroscopic intra-capsular surgical procedures about the hip. The Medial Femoral Circumflex Artery (MFCA) provides the primary FH vascular contribution. Distribution of vascular foramina at the Femoral Head-Neck Junction (FHNJ) has been reported previously using an imaginary clock face. However, no quantitative information exists on the precise Capsular Insertion (CI) and intra-capsular course of the MFCA Terminal Branches (TBs) supplying the FH. This study seeks to determine the precise anatomic location of the MFCA's TBs supplying the FH, in order to help avoid iatrogenic vascular damage during surgical intervention. In 14 fresh-frozen cadaveric hips (9 left and 5 right), we cannulated the MFCA and injected a polyurethane compound. Using a posterior approach, careful dissection of the MFCA allowed us to identify and document the extra- and intra-capsular course of the TBs penetrating the FHNJ and supplying the FH. An H-type capsulotomy provided joint access while preserving the intracapsular Retinaculum of Weitbrecht (RW), followed by circumferential capsulotomy at the acetabular margin exposing the FH. The dome of the FH was osteotomized 5 mm proximal to the Articular Border (AB) providing a flat surface for our 360° scale. Right-side equivalents were used for data processing.Introduction
Methods
an abnormal alpha angle (>
49°) measured on the elongated femoral neck x-ray, a positive cross-over sign or pro-trusio acetabuli in the AP pelvis x-ray, the presence of diminished anteversion in the femur (<
10°) or a retroverted femur (<
0°) in the CT scan, associated with a positive hip impingement test and lack of internal rotation at 90 degrees of flexion. We documented the type of FAI, the presence of acetabular dysplasia, coxa valga, coxa vara and the femoral version measured on the CT scan. The degree of osteoarthritis of the hip using the Tönnis classification was documented as well.
