Introduction

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) concept in arthroplasty surgery has led to a reduction in postoperative length of stay in recent years. Patients with prolonged length of stay (PLOS) add to the burden of a strained NHS. Our aim was to identify the main reasons.

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to measure the resected surface of femur of the Korean patients during total knee arthroplasty surgery and to compare these measurements with the dimensions of femoral implants in current use.

Materials and Methods: Morphometric data (7 parameters) were obtained in 500 cases of resected femur of the Korean patients who underwent total knee arthroplasties, and these data were compared with four current implants designs.

Results: The range of medial-lateral width at the given implant varies widely. The anterior width of the resected femur at the condyle is smaller than the widths of the most implants, creating an overhang. The medial-lateral width of the condyle at the level of transepicondylar line is wider than most of the present implants. However the widths of the resected posterior condyles were narrower at anterior-posterior alignment, causing overhang at the posterior condyles. We felt this will cause anterior tensioning at flexion and reduce the ability to flex further.

Conclusion: The shape of the femur in Korean knee is different from that of current TKR implants in use, which are based on the anthropometric data of Caucasians. Therefore new design, better suited to the morphometric measurements of Korean knee, is necessary. Though historically this mismatch of the implant was well tolerated, new design to better fit the measurement of Korean knee should be considered for functional enhancement such as range of motion, durability and function.