Introduction

The transtibial approach is widely used for femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction. Controversy exists over the superiority of this approach over others. Few studies reflected on the reproducibility rates of the femoral tunnel position in relation to the approach used.

The transtibial approach is widely used for femoral tunnel positioning in ACL reconstruction. Controversy exists over the superiority of this approach over others. Few studies reflected on the reproducibility rates of the femoral tunnel position in relation to the approach used.

We reviewed AP and Lat X-ray radiographs post isolated ACL reconstruction for 180 patients for femoral tunnel position, tibial tunnel position and graft inclination angle. All patients had their operations performed by one surgeon in one hospital between March 2006 and Sep 2010. All operations were performed using one standard technique using transtibial approach for femoral tunnel positioning.

Two orthopaedic fellows, with similar experiences, reviewed blinded radiographs. A second reading was done 8 weeks later. Pearson inter-observer, intra-observer correlation and Bland-Altman agreements plots statistical analyses were done.

Mean age was 29 years (range 16–54), Pearson intra-observer correlation shows substantial to perfect agreement while Pearson's inter-observer correlation shows moderate to substantial agreement.

Previous literature proved that optimal femoral tunnel position for the best clinical and biomechanical outcome is for the centre of the tunnel to be at 43% from the lateral end of the width of the femoral condyles on the AP view and at 86% from the anterior end of the Blumensaat's line on the lateral view. In our study 85% of the femoral tunnels were within +/− 5% of the optimal tunnel position on the AP views, and more than 70% of the femoral tunnels were within +/−5% of the optimal tunnel position on the Lateral view. Interobserver and intraobserver corelations show moderate to substantial agreement, Bland-Altman agreement plots show substantial agreements for interobserver and intraobserver measurements. These results were found to be statistically significant at 0.01

Based on our results we conclude that using one standardised transtibial technique for ACL reconstruction can result in high reproducibility rates of optimal femoral tunnel position. Further studies are needed to validate our results and to study the reproducibility rates for different approaches and techniques.

This paper describes an audit loop. We studied patients undergoing hip and knee surgery (arthroplasty and revision arthroplasty). All the patients were ‘complex elective’. I.e. they were either ASA grade 3 or 4, or had a body mass index in excess of 40. We collected data concerning postoperative admissions to HDU, ICU and PACU (planned and unplanned rates of admission, length of stay). We also noted mortality.

In the first part of the study (April 2005 to March 2006) we studied 298 patients. All patients were assessed independently by an anaesthetist on the day of surgery.

A multidisciplinary preoperative assessment clinic commenced in April 2006. After this date all patients were assessed preoperatively by a multidisciplinary anaesthetic lead team (anaesthetist, orthopaedic senior house officer, nurse practitioner). The need for an HDU or ICU bed was assessed and the bed was booked at part of the pre-operative plan.

In the second part of the study (May 2006 to April 2009) a further 1147 arthroplasty patients were studied. Data was again collected regarding HDU, ICU, PACU and mortality as noted above.

We found statistically significant (p=0.001) reductions in the admissions to PACU (22% down to 10%) and in mortality (6.1% down to 1.2%) after the introduction of the pre assessment clinic. There was also statistically significant (p=0.01) reduction in the HDU length of stay(2.1 days to 1.6 days), ITU unplanned admissions (1.3% to 0.4%) and the ITU length of stay in days (2.3 to 1.9 days).

We also estimated cost savings of nearly £50 000 in the second limb of the study. This is based on the average decrease in HDU and ICU length of stay.

We recommend the use of a multidisciplinary pre assessment clinic for complex orthopaedic surgery.

Introduction

“No routine post-operative follow up appointments” policy has been implemented in NHS hospitals in different specialties for uncomplicated surgical procedures. In trauma and orthopaedics few studies to date reviewed this practice and reflected on the patients' opinions.

We are presenting a prospective analysis and assessment for the results of the Coflex@ inter-spinous dynamic stabilization device with a 2 year follow up. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the Coflex@ Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Implant.

A prospective analysis was performed on 121 patients (176 devices) treated with the Coflex@ Interspinous Implant. Indication for the treatment was spinal canal foraminal stenosis with nerve root irritation.

Pre- and postoperative disability and pain scores were measured using Oswestry disability score, functional assessment a radiological evaluation at pre-operative - three - six twelve and twenty-four month interval.

Data analysis revealed a high rate of patient satisfaction 92% of patients are satisfied and will have the surgery again 81% of patients had major improvement of their leg symptoms. 72% of patients reported improvement of their back pain symptoms this was more noted in the decompression group.

Two revision surgeries were carried out. One due to implant back-out and the second due to infection.

The Coflex@inter-spinous implant is a simple surgical treatment strategy with a low risk. Early results show a good improvement of both clinical and radiological parameters combined with patient satisfaction with better outcome achieved if combined with spinal decompression.

In this study we reviewed all Total Elbow Replacements (TER) done in our hospital over eight years period (1997 – 2005), 21 patients (16 females, 5 males) were available for follow up and four were lost (two died and two moved out of the region) with average age of 65 years (range 44 – 77), all procedures were done by two upper limb surgeons (CHB & RGW). 16 patients (14 females, 2 males) had the procedure for Rheumatoid Arthritis and 5 patients (3 males, 2 females) undergone the procedure for post-traumatic arthritis.

The average follow up was 61 months (range 12 – 120 months), the Mayo Clinic performance index, the DASH scores and activities of daily living (adopted from Secec Elbow Score) assessment tools were used. In addition, all patients were assessed for loosening using standard AP and lateral radiographs. Sixteen patients had Souter-Starthclyde prosthesis whilst three had Kudo and two had Conrad-Moorey prosthesis.

All procedures were done through dorsal approach and all were cemented, the ulnar nerve was not transposed in any of the cases. The average elbow extension lag was 27 degrees (range 15 – 35) with flexion up to 130 degrees (range 110 – 140). Supination was 65 degrees (range 15 – 90) and pronation was 77 (range 55 – 90). The average DASH score was 51.3 (range 19 – 95), the Mayo elbow score was 82 (range 55 – 100) and the average Activities of daily living Secec Score was 17 (range 10 – 20).

There were four complications, three ulnar nerve paresis which recovered and one wound complication which needed a flap cover. Two needed revision surgery, one for a periprosthetic fracture and one for loosening. Two patients showed radiological signs of loosening but were asymptomatic. The survival rate with revision as the end point is 95% for aseptic loosening and 90% for any other reason.

Our study proves TER has good medium term results with good functional outcome and high patient satisfaction rate.

Introduction: Patients presenting with fracture of the femoral neck are usually elderly, and often have extensive co-morbidity. Patients who are considered too unwell for surgery are often keep being delayed until assumed optimised or treated non-operatively. These patients have a high morbidity and mortality and present significant nursing difficulties.

Materials and Methods: We describe a technique of fixation of fracture of the femoral neck under direct infiltration local anaesthesia; that can be performed on the sick elderly patient without the risks associated with general or regional anaesthesia. In a series of twenty eight patients all diagnosed with serious co-morbidity (ASA4) on pre-operative assessment. Twenty three patients suffered from extracapsular fracture neck of femur and five intracapsular fracture neck of femur. All patients were informed about the risks of anesthesia by the senior anesthetist prior to surgery. A mixture of 20 mls n.saline + 20mls of 1% lignocaine with 1:200,000 adrenaline + 20mls 0f.25% plain marcaine (total 60 mls used). This can be increased up to 140 mls in the same ratios.

Results: All patients were operated by various grade registrars. Twenty four (24) DHS and four Hemiarthro-plasty were performed. The patients were all able to complete the surgery using this technique; none required conversion to another form of anaesthesia.

The average duration of surgery was 44 min. All patients survived the procedure and until discharge form hospital.

Discussion: Finlayson and Underhill (1988) suggested that extracapsular fractures are supplied predominantly by the femoral nerve and are therefore more amenable to this type of treatment.

We recommend the consideration of this technique for management of patients with severe co-morbidity and fracture of the femoral neck in order to optimise their chance of survival and avoid the morbidity associated with bed rest.