Acetabular revision for cavitary defects in failed total hip replacement remains a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Bone graft with cemented or uncemented revision is the primary solution; however, there are cases where structural defects are too large. Cup cage constructs have been successful in treating these defects but they do have their problems with early loosening and metalwork failure. Recently, highly porous cups that incorporate metal augments have been developed to achieve greater intra-operative stability showing encouraging results. Retrospective analysis of twenty-six consecutive acetabular revisions with Trabecular Titanium cups. Inclusion criteria included aseptic cases, adult patients, end-stage disease with signs of loosening, no trauma nor peri-prosthetic fractures. Data was obtained for patient demographics, Paprosky classification, use of bone graft, use of acetabular augment, and Moore index of osseointegration.Introduction
Methods
Increased accuracy of pre-operative imaging in patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) can result in longer-term savings, and reduced accumulated dose of radiation by eliminating the need for post-operative imaging or revision surgery. The benefits and drawbacks of CT vs MRI for use in PSI is a source of ongoing debate. This study reviews all currently available evidence regarding accuracy of CT vs MRI for pre-operative imaging in PSI. The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched between 1990 and 2013 to identify relevant studies. As most studies available focus on validation of a single technique rather than a direct comparison, the data from several clinical studies was assimilated to allow comparison of accuracy. Overall accuracy of each modality was calculated as proportion of outliers >3 % in the coronal plane.Introduction
Methods
The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a valid and reliable self-administered patient questionnaire that enables assessment of the outcome following total knee replacement (TKR). There is as yet no literature on the behavioral trends of the OKS over time. Our aim is to present a retrospective audit of the OKS for patients who have undergone TKR during the past ten years. We retrospectively analysed 3276 OKS of patients who had a primary TKR and had been registered as part of a multi-surgeon, outcome-monitoring program at St. Helier hospital. The OKS was gathered pre-operatively and post-operatively by means of postal questionnaires at annual intervals. Patients were grouped as per their age at operation into four groups: 60, 61-70, 71- 80 and >80. A cross-sectional analysis of OKS at different time points was performed. The numbers of OKS available for analysis were 504 pre-operatively, 589 at one-year, 512 at two-year and gradually decreasing numbers with 87 knees ten-year post-operatively. There was as expected a significant decrease (improvement) of the OKS between pre-operative and one-year post-operative period and then reached a plateau. Beyond eight years, there is a gradual rise in the score (deterioration). The younger patients (60) showed a significant increase in their average OKS between one and five-years post-operatively. However beyond five years, they followed the trend of their older counterparts. When the twelve questions in the OKS were analysed, certain components revealed greater improvement (e.g. description of knee pain and limping) than others (e.g. night pain). The OKS is seen to plateau a year after TKR. According to the OKS the outcome of the TKR is not as good in the younger age group as compared to the older age group. Further investigation is required to ascertain the cause of this observed difference.
