In 2022, approximately 60% of inserted cups and stems in Sweden utilized cemented fixation. Two predominant brands, Refobacin Bone Cement R and Palacos R+G, both incorporating gentamicin, were employed in over 90% of primary cemented Total Hip Arthroplasties (THAs) between 2012 and 2022. This study investigates whether the choice between these cement types affects the risk of revision.

The five most frequently used cemented cups and the three most common stems were studied. Inclusion criteria encompassed hips with non-tumour diagnoses, operated through a direct lateral or posterior incision, featuring a 28–36 mm metal or ceramic head. Outcomes were assessed for cup revisions (n=55,457 Refobacin, 37,210 Palacos), stem revisions (n=51,732 Refobacin, 30,018 Palacos), and all-cemented THAs with either brand (n=45,265 Refobacin, 26,347 Palacos). Kaplan-Meier life tables and hazard ratios (HR) utilizing Cox regression were computed, adjusting for age, sex, diagnosis, implant type, femoral head size, and material.

Over a 10-year period, the cumulative percent revision with Refobacin was consistently higher than Palacos in all three analyses (cups: Refobacin 2.4 (2.3–2.5), Palacos 2.1 (2.0–2.2); stems: Refobacin 2.6 (2.5–2.7), Palacos 2.1 (2,0–2,2); all-cemented: Refobacin 3.2 (2.9–3.5), Palacos 2.9 (2.6–3.2)). Both unadjusted and adjusted HR were 13–25% lower with Palacos. In the analysis of all-cemented THAs, the adjusted HR for Palacos was 0.85 (0.76–0.95). Separating revisions into infectious and non-infectious reasons revealed a lower risk of infectious revisions with Palacos in all three analyses (all-cemented: adjusted HR infection 0.66 (0.56–0.78); non-infectious 1.10 (0.94–1.28)).

Hips cemented with Refobacin may face an increased risk of infection, potentially due to a smaller release of antibiotics into surrounding tissues. Unaccounted factors like different mixing systems or unknown biases could also influence outcomes, emphasizing the need for further investigation.

Short-stem total hip arthroplasty (THA) may have bone sparing properties, which could be advantageous in a younger population with high risk of future revision surgery. We used data from the AOANJRR, LROI and SAR to compare survival rates of primary THA, stems used in the first-time revision procedures as well as the overall survival of first-time revisions between a cohort of short-stem and standard-stem THA.

Short-stem THAs (designed as a short stem with mainly metaphyseal fixation) between 2007 and 2021 were identified (n=16,258). A propensity score matched cohort (1:2) with standard THAs in each register was identified (n=32,515). The cohorts were merged into a research dataset. Overall survival at 12 years follow-up was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. Stem revisions (short-stem THA n=239, standard-stem THA n=352) were identified. The type of revision stem was classified as standard (<160 mm) or long (>160 mm). The survival rate of all first-time revisions in the two groups was calculated using any type of revision as outcome.

The 12 year- overall survival rate (all revisions, all causes) for primary short-stem THAs was 95.3% (CI 94.5–95.9%), which was comparable to 95.2% (CI 94.7–95.7%) for standard-stem THAs. In the short-stem THA group, a standard stem (<160 mm) was more often (59%) used in the first-time revision than in the standard-stem group (47%, p=0.004). The overall survival of the first-time revisions did not differ between cases primarily operated with a short or a standard stem.

In our multi-national register study, the overall survival rate of short stems was similar to that of standard stems. In short stem revisions there was a higher likelihood of using a standard-length stem for the revision compared with first-time revisions of standard stems. This finding might indicate bone-sparing properties with short-stemmed THAs.

Aims

Refobacin Bone Cement R and Palacos R + G bone cement were introduced to replace the original cement Refobacin Palacos R in 2005. Both cements were assumed to behave in a biomechanically similar fashion to the original cement. The primary aim of this study was to compare the migration of a polished triple-tapered femoral stem fixed with either Refobacin Bone Cement R or Palacos R + G bone cement. Repeated radiostereometric analysis was used to measure migration of the femoral head centre. The secondary aims were evaluation of cement mantle, stem positioning, and patient-reported outcome measures.

In 1975, Sweden started registering primary knee replacement surgeries based on the personal identity number. Individual-based registrations of primary total hip replacements started in 1992 and for hemiarthroplasties the registration started in 2006. The completeness of these registrations is estimated at 98% during the last 10-year period. The long history and high completeness allow for accurate calculations of population-based prevalence of joint replacement and trends over time.

We used all data on primary joint replacements available in the Swedish Arthroplasty Register. The prevalence was calculated using number of alive patients with 1) at least one joint replacement 2) at least one hip replacement 3) at least one knee replacement at the end of each year from 2010 – 2021. Publicly available population numbers were retrieved from Statistics Sweden. We calculated total prevalence and prevalence per age in years.

By the end of 2021, 3.2% of the Swedish population had at least one hip or knee replacement. This was an increase from 2.5% in 2010. Among 80-year-old, the prevalence was 17.5% for any joint replacement. For both hip and knee replacement and all ages, the prevalence was higher for women. For knee replacement, the 2021 prevalence peaked at the age of 89 (9,4%) while the prevalence continuously increased with age for hip replacements.

A considerable proportion of the Swedish elderly population is living with at least one hip or knee replacement. The prevalence has increased during the last 12-year period for both hips and knees. An increasing prevalence may also affect the incidence of fractures and infections. Knowledge about the prevalence is fundamental for planning future demand for primary and revision hip and knee replacement.

Aims

Although the Fitmore Hip Stem has been on the market for almost 15 years, it is still not well documented in randomized controlled trials. This study compares the Fitmore stem with the CementLeSs (CLS) in several different clinical and radiological aspects. The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in outcome between stems.

Aim

Previous publications have suggested that the incidence of revisions due to infection after THA is increasing. We performed updated time-trend analyses of risk and timing of revision due to infection after primary THAs in the Nordic countries during the period 2004–2018.

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the mid-term patient-reported outcome, bone remodelling, and migration of a short stem (Collum Femoris Preserving; CFP) with a conventional uncemented stem (Corail).

Young patients are at increased risk of revision after primary THA (THA). The bearing surface may be of importance for the longevity of the joint.

We aimed to compare the risk of revision of primary stemmed cementless THA with MoM and CoC with metal-on-highly-crosslinked-polyethylene (MoXLP) bearings in patients between 20–54 years.

From NARA, we included 2,153 MoM, 4,120 CoC and 10,329 MoXLP THA operated between 1995 and 2017. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for calculation of THA survivorship and Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of revision (95% CI) due to any and specific causes. MoXLP was reference.

The median follow-up was 10.3 years for MoM, 6.6 years for CoC and 4.8 years for MoXLP. 15 years postoperatively the Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were 80% (78–83%) for MoM, 92% (91–93%) for CoC and 94% (93–95%) for MoXLP. The 0–2, 2–7 and 7–15 years adjusted HRs of revision by any cause were 1.4 (0.9–2.4), 3.2 (2.1–5.1) and 3.9 (1.9–7.9) for MoM and 1.1 (0.8–1.4), 1.0 (0.7–1.3) and 2.5 (1.3–4.8) for CoC bearings. After 7–15 years follow-up, the unadjusted HR of revision due to aseptic loosening was 5.4 (1.2–24) for MoM and 4.2 (0.9–20) for CoC THA. MoM and CoC had a 7–15 year adjusted HR of revision due to ‘other’ causes of 4.8 (1.6–14) and 2.1 (0.8–5.8).

MoXLP bearings were associated with better survival than MoM and CoC bearings, mainly because of lower risk of revision due to aseptic loosening and ‘other’ causes.

We evaluated an anatomical uncemented stem, SP-CL, (Static Physiologicus – CementLess) designed to facilitate insertion and to avoid stress concentration at solitary contact points in a randomized controlled trial, with use of the Corail stem as control. The SPÅ-Cl stem has been on the market since 2014 but is still not well documented.

79 patients (80 hips) were primarily recruited and 71 patients (72 hips, 36 SP-CL, 36 Corail) attended the last follow up at 2 years. The clinical evaluation included several types of PROMs with Oxford Hip Score (OHS) as primary outcome. In addition, repeated measurements of stem migration, changes in bone mineral density and development of radiolucencies were studied with RSA, DXA and conventional radiography.

At two years the Oxford Hip Score did not differ between the SP-CL and Corail stem (estimated mean difference: −0.70 (95% CI: −4.28 – 2.89). In both groups Oxford hip score had almost doubled at 3 months, continued to increase up to 6 months and was about equal at 2 years (SP-CL; median 46 (17–48), Corail; median 47 (19–48)). At 2 years the SP-CL stems showed a median distal migration of −0.23 (−5.2 – 0.1) and the Corail stems of − 0.11 (−4.4 – 0.4). The SP-CL stems showed slightly more loss of bone mineral density in Gruen region 7 (p = 0.003).

We found no difference in clinical results with use of either of the two stems. Bone mineral density loss tended to be higher with use of the SP-CL stem and the early subsidence tended to be more pronounced, which turned out to be compatible with about the same stem stability reached between 1 and 2 years. As a next step we think that the SP-CL stem should be studied in a multi-center setting, before accepted for general use.

Aims

We investigated patient characteristics and outcomes of Vancouver type B periprosthetic fractures treated with femoral component revision and/or osteosynthesis.

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to compare the wear properties of vitamin E-diffused, highly crosslinked polyethylene (VEPE) and one formulation of moderately crosslinked and mechanically annealed ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (ModXLPE) in patients five years after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The secondary aim was to assess the clinical results of patients treated with VEPE by evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiological evidence of fixation, and the incidence of mechanical failure.

The primary purpose of the current study was to evaluate and compare the wear properties of vitamin E-doped, highly-crosslinked PE (VEPE) and one formulation of moderately cross-linked and mechanically-annealed ultra-high molecular weight PE (ModXLPE) in patients five years after primary THA. We also sought to understand whether polyethylene wear is associated with radiographic evidence of bone resorption or with deterioration in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

A total of 221 patients from four international centers were recruited into a prospective RSA and clinical outcomes study. Seventy percent (76%) of patients received VEPE (vs. ModXLPE) liners, and 36% received ceramic (vs. metal) femoral heads. PROMs and radiographs were collected preoperatively and at one, two, and five years postoperatively. In addition, RSA radiographs were collected to measure PE wear.

We observed similar bedding in through the one-year interval and wear through the two-year interval between the two liner types. However, there was significantly more femoral head penetration in the ModXLPE cohort compared to the VEPE cohort at the five-year follow-up (p<0.001). The only variables independently predictive of increased wear were ModXLPE (vs VEPE) liner type (β=0.22, p=0.010) and metal (vs. ceramic) femoral head type (β=0.21, p=0.013). There was no association between increased wear and radiolucency development (p=0.866) or PROMs. No patients were found to have evidence of osteolysis.

At five-years postoperatively, patients treated with VEPE (vs. ModXLPE) and ceramic (vs. metal) femoral heads demonstrated decreased wear. At the longest follow-up (five years postoperatively), the wear rates for both liner groups were very low and have not led to any osteolysis or implant failures via aseptic loosening.

The reported success rate after treatment with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) of hip prosthesis infections has been found variable. We evaluated all reoperations performed because of infection and reported to Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR) between 1999 and 2016. The analyses were separated into reoperations performed for the first time and those which had been preceded by at least one previous reoperation performed because of the same reason. The outcome was repeated reoperation performed because of infection.

1,882 were first-time procedures (Group I) and 2,275 had been preceded by at least one reoperation due to infection (Group II). Head and/or liner exchange had been performed in 47% of the cases in group I, and in 22% in Group II. The mean age varied between 70 and 71 years and there was a dominance of males in all groups (52–59%). Compared to all primary THR performed during this period (n=319,813) patients with inflammatory disease, idiopathic femoral head necrosis and sequel after childhood disease were overrepresented for this type of procedure.

Between 1999 and 2016 the number of DAIR procedures increased from 29 to 383 per year corresponding to 21 and 72 % of all reoperations performed due to infection. In first time reoperations the survival was 74.5±3.1% if the head/liner had been exchanged and 46.2±3.2% if only irrigation and synovectomy had been performed. In patients reoperated at least one time previously due to infection the survival rates dropped to 68.6±4.6% and 34.5±2.4%.

Compared to first time reoperation with exchange of femoral and/or liner, synovectomy and irrigation without exchange of any implant part(s) resulted in an almost tripled risk of a second reoperation due to same reason (Hazard Ratio: 2.8, 95% confidence interval: 2.4–3.3). In cases previously reoperated because of infection (Group II) exchange of head/liner and debridement had a 28% increased risk of failure compared to the corresponding first time reoperations (1.28 1.02–1.6). If none of the components were replaced in Group II, the risk ratio for a new failure increased almost 4 times (3.8 3.3–4.4). Presence of a cemented stem increased the risk for further reoperations due to infection (1.14 1.02–1.28), but not presence of a cemented cup (1.06 0.92–1.19). All hazard ratios were adjusted for age, gender, diagnosis and type of fixation.

The comparatively good results observed after exchange of head and liner might indicate that this is necessary to perform a sufficiently radical debridement. This observation could also be biased by a surgeon related factor suggesting that component exchange mainly is performed by surgeons with long experience of revision surgery.

The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register started in 1979 and celebrates its 40^th anniversary in 2019. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register is not primarily a device register or research database; we strive to provide an overall assessment of the care provided with a multidimensional approach, and to disseminate knowledge on best practices in our network of participating hospitals. Since the inception of the register, there has been a marked change in trends and outcomes.

The completeness of registrations has been 97–99% for primary THA, 93–95% for revisions, and 95–98% for HA over the last 10 years. The register contains 371,125 primary THAs, 55,893 HAs, 83,233 reoperations, and 408,110 PROM responses registered in 352,585 unique patients. All outcome measures have improved over time; primary THA has 0.71% 90-day mortality, 94.3% 10-year implant survival, and 2.2% 2-year reoperation rate. At 1-year follow up, 91% of the patients report a clinically significant pain reduction, 76% report a substantial improvement in health-related quality of life, and 89% are satisfied with the result of the operation.

Moving forward, we are developing enhanced online applications for surgeons, patients and the implant industry to access real-time information. This work involves constructing a shared decision-making tool that helps clinicians assessing the future benefits and risks of THA by offering individualized outcome predictions. Further steps forward include randomized clinical trials and nested studies through the registry's platform. The trends and changes in Swedish arthroplasty practice have largely been promoted and facilitated by the register over the last 40 years.

Deep infection after THA is a devastating complication that implies major suffering for the patients and large costs for society. Reports from multiple national and regional registries show increasing incidence of deep infection. Is this a consequence of improved diagnostics, changed virulence of the causative organism, increased co-morbidity of the patients?

An open database will be setup and hosted by an existing, high quality registry. All possible variables including patient demographic, detailed surgical information, bacteria/fungus characteristics, antibiotic treatment, radiographic findings and follow-up for 3 years will be collected. The incoming data will be displayed on a dashboard with continuous analyses and statistics. Any individual surgeon or hospital can report data.

A board with members from the International Hip Society and the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries will supervise the process and facilitate scientific analyses from collected data.

Osteolysis secondary to ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) wear is a leading cause of late-term implant failure via aseptic loosening in patients treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). Radiation crosslinking of UHMWPE has been shown to decrease wear. However, the resulting polymer (crosslinked-PE) has a high free radical content. Two different methods that have been used to reduce the remaining free radicals are mechanical annealing and chemical stabilization using Vitamin E, a free radical scavenger.

The primary purpose of the current study was to evaluate and compare the wear properties of vitamin E-doped crosslinked-PE (VEPE) and one formulation of mechanically annealed crosslinked-PE using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in patients five years after primary THA. We also sought to understand the association between polyethylene wear and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Three-hundred and five patients from six international centers were enrolled. Seventy-six percent were treated with highly-crosslinked (95 kGy) VEPE liners, and the rest received moderately-crosslinked (50 kGy) (ModXL), mechanically annealed liners. Data was collected prospectively at one-, two-, and five-year intervals.

At the 5-year follow-up, proximal femoral head penetration into the VEPE liners (median = 0.05mm (range, −0.03–1.20)) was significantly lower than the penetration into the ModXL liners (median = 0.15mm (range, −0.22–1.04)) (p<0.001). In the VEPE cohort the median proximal penetration did not increase from one- to five-year follow-up (p=0.209). In contrast, there was a significant increase in femoral head penetration for the ModXL group (p<0.001) during that same time. Multivariable regression showed that the only variable predictive of increased wear was ModXL liner type (B=0.12, p<0.001). There were no differences in PROMs between the liner groups, and there was no correlation between polyethylene wear and PROMs for the cohort as a whole.

The current study is the largest analysis of polyethylene wear at five-year follow-up using the RSA technique. We observed similar bedding in through the two-year interval between the two liner types, however, there was significantly more wear in the ModXL cohort at five-years. Currently, the wear rates for both liner groups are below the osteolysis threshold and have not led to any implant failures via aseptic loosening. Continued follow-up will provide a better understanding of the association between wear rate and clinical outcomes.

We cross-matched the Swedish Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registers (SHAR and SKAR) to study the incidence of knee or hip arthroplasty in any of the remaining hip or knee joints.

177835 THR (55.8% females, mean age, SD: 68.5 10.1 years) and 128162 primary TKR (59.8% females, 69.4 9.0 years) procedures in patients with primary osteoarthritis, performed 1992–2014 were studied. Mean and maximum follow up were 7.7 and 23 years.

At the index operation more patients were operated on their right side for both locations (hip and knee). Patients who at the index operation had been operated with a TKR and especially on the left side most frequently (32.5%) received one or several additional TKR or THR. For patients who had a THR at their index operation and underwent a second operation of any of the remaining three joints the mean time to this second procedure was 4.0 years (SD: 3.9). In patients who were operated with a TKR this time period was shorter (3.1, 3.2, p<0.0005).

In patients who had undergone their first (index) operation of either hip the probability of not being subjected to further arthroplasty operations during the following 20 years amounted to 64.0±0.3%. The corresponding probability for patients who at the index operation had received a TKR was somewhat lower (58.4±0.4%). Decreasing age (HR: 1.029, 95% confidence interval: 1.028–1.0292), female gender (1.13 1.12–1.15), TKR at index operation (1.34 1.32–1.36) and left-sided index operation (1.12 1.10–1.13) were associated with higher probability for at least one additional primary joint replacement in the hip or the knee.

During our period of observation 25 to 33 percent of the patients who received their first total hip or knee replacement underwent at least one additional replacement of either the hip or the knee. Knee osteoarthritis more frequently results in staged bilateral joint replacement than in patients who primarily are suffering from osteoarthritis of the hip.

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of aseptic loosening after the use of a cemented acetabular component and a Trabecular Metal (TM) acetabular component (Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, Indiana) at acetabular revision with bone impaction grafting.

Prospectively collected data is an important source of information subjected to change over time. What surgeons were doing in 1999 might not be the case anymore in 2016 and this change in time also applies to a number of factors related to the performance and outcome of total hip replacement. We evaluated the evolution of factors related to the patient, the surgical procedure, socio-economy and various outcome parameters after merging the databases of the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Statistics Sweden and the National Board of Health and Welfare.

Data on 193,253 THRs (164,113 patients) operated between 1999 and 2012 were merged with databases including general information about the Swedish population and about hospital care. We studied the evolution of surgical volume, patient demographics, socio-economic factors, surgical factors, length of stay, mortality rate, adverse events, re-operation and revision rates and PROMs.

Most patients were operated because of primary osteoarthritis and this share increased further during the period at the expense of decreasing number of patients with inflammatory OA and hip fracture. Comorbidity and ASA scores increased for each year. The share of all cemented implants has dropped from 92% to 68% with a corresponding increase of all uncemented from 2% to 16%.

Length of stay decreased with about 50 percent to 4.5 days in 2012. The 30- and 90-day mortality rate dropped to 0.4% and 0.7%. Re-operation and revision rates at 2 years were lower in the more recent years. The postoperative PROMs are improving despite the preoperative pain scores getting worse.

Even in Sweden, always been considered as a very conservative country with regards to hip replacement surgery, the demographics of the patients, the comorbidities and the primary diagnosis for surgery are changing. Despite these changes the outcomes like mortality, re-operations, revisions and PROMs are improving.

Infection after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a devastating complication. With an ageing population and increased demands for THA, prosthetic joint infection (PJI) is expected to become an even greater problem in the future. In late PJI a one- or two-stage revision procedure is most often used. Factors determining the outcomes are not fully understood and there is controversy in the choice between the two methods. The, two-stage method in infected THA is regarded as more resource demanding and is associated with a high distress in the patients.

The aim of this study was to compare the risk for second revision (re-revision) between one- and two-stage revision.

During 1979–2015, 1659 first-time revisions performed due to infection were reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Two-stage revision was the most common procedure (n=1255). Risk for a re-revision was compared between one- and two-stage revision using Cox-regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis and method of fixation. The primary end-point was a re-revision regardless of cause. Aseptic loosening, infection, and dislocation necessitating re-revision were used as secondary outcomes.

There was no difference in risk of re-revision regardless of cause (HR (one-stage/two-stage)=0.9, 95% C.I.=0.7–1.1, p=0.3), re-revision due to aseptic loosening (HR=1.1, 95% C.I.=0.7–1.6, p=0.7) or re-revision due to infection (HR=0.7, 95% C.I.=0.5–1.1, p=0.2). Dislocation necessitating a re-revision was less common in the one-stage group (HR=0.4, 95% C.I.=0.2–0.9, p=0.03).

In this analysis re-revision rates were similar in the two groups. When analysed specifically for infection, risk of re-revision did not differ between one and two stage revision. Our findings confirm recent systematic reviews on the matter.

This observational study supports increased utilisation of the one-stage approach. However prospective randomized studies are needed to validate these findings.