Introduction: There has been an increasing use of orthotic knee braces in the management of knee injuries. To ensure the biomechanics of the knee are not adversely affected, it is important that orthotic knee braces accurately provide the desired angle of immobilisation. The objective of our study was to measure the actual knee flexion angles for a lockable orthotic knee brace, and measure the resulting knee flexion moment.

Materials and methods: Eight healthy male volunteers participated in the study looking at six different types of knee immobilisation: locked in 0, 10, 20, 30 degrees of knee flexion, with the brace unlocked, and without a brace. Force and 3-dimensional motion data were collected using a single Kistler force plate and an eight-camera Qualisys ProReflex motion analysis system.

Results: The kinematic knee flexion angles were significantly different when compared with the angles set at the orthotic knee brace for 0 degrees (p=0.001) and 10 degrees (p=0.011). The kinematic knee flexion angle when no brace was used was significantly different from the angle for the unlocked orthotic knee brace (p= 0.003). The knee flexion moment was directly proportional to the knee flexion angle. There was a statistically significant difference between the knee flexion moment for the six types of immobilisation (p< 0.001).

Discussion: The knee flexion angles measured using the kinematic data did not always correspond with the angle set at the orthotic knee brace. These findings highlight inadequacies in the design of lockable orthotic knee braces, especially at low flexion angles of 0 and 10 degrees. The resulting higher actual knee flexion angles were associated with greater knee flexion moments and joint reaction forces at the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints. This can, at best result in increased energy expenditure and decreased agility, and at worse potentially augment injuries to the knee.

We describe the influence of the angle of immobilisation during partial weight-bearing on the forces across the extensor mechanism of the knee. Gait analysis was performed on eight healthy male subjects with the right knee in an orthotic brace locked at 0°, 10°, 20° and 30°, with the brace unlocked and also without a brace. The ground reaction force, the angle of the knee and the net external flexion movement about the knee were measured and the extensor mechanism force was calculated.

The results showed a direct non-linear relationship between the angle of knee flexion and the extensor mechanism force. When a brace was applied, the lowest forces occurred when the brace was locked at 0°. At 30° the forces approached the failure strength of some fixation devices. We recommend that for potentially unstable injuries of the extensor mechanism, when mobilising with partial weight-bearing, the knee should be flexed at no more than 10°.

In this cross-over study, we evaluated two types of knee brace commonly used in the conservative treatment of osteoarthritis of the medial compartment. Twelve patients confirmed radiologically as having unilateral osteoarthritis of the medial compartment (Larsen grade 2 to grade 4) were studied. Treatment with a simple hinged brace was compared with that using a valgus corrective brace. Knee kinematics, ground reaction forces, pain and function were assessed during walking and the Hospital for Special Surgery scores were also determined.

Significant improvements in pain, function, and loading and propulsive forces were seen with the valgus brace. Treatment with a simple brace showed only significant improvements in loading forces. Our findings suggest that although both braces improved confidence and function during gait, the valgus brace showed greater benefit.