Aims

Earlier studies dealing with trends in the management of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) identified an increasing rate of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and a decreasing rate of joint-preserving procedures between 1992 and 2008. In an effort to assess new trends in the management of this condition, this study evaluated the annual trends of joint-preserving versus arthroplasties for patients aged < or > 50 years old, and the incidence of specific operative management techniques.

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to analyze trends in the surgical management of ON in recent years. Specifically, we evaluated the annual prevalences of: 1) joint preserving procedures (osteotomies and core decompression/grafts) and 2) joint non-preserving procedures (total hip arthroplasties [THAs], revision THAs, partial THAs) for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) between 2009 and 2016.

Non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a potentially devastating condition, the prevalence of which is increasing. Many joint-preserving forms of treatment, both medical and surgical, have been developed in an attempt to slow or reverse its progression, as it usually affects young patients.

However, it is important to evaluate the best evidence that is available for the many forms of treatment considering the variation in the demographics of the patients, the methodology and the outcomes in the studies that have been published, so that it can be used effectively.

The purpose of this review, therefore, was to provide an up-to-date, evidence-based guide to the management, both non-operative and operative, of non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1267–79.

Purpose: Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee is a potentially greatly debilitating condition. While success has been reported with non-operative treatment of this disorder in its earliest stages, knee arthroplasty is the only viable modality if allowed to progress to condylar collapse. The purpose of this report is to review the etiologic and pathophysiologic principles of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee, to present our experience with joint-preserving surgical treatment of this condition, and finally to introduce a treatment algorithm developed based on this knowledge.

Method: Seventeen patients with a clinical and/or radiographic a diagnosis of spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee, and exclusion of secondary osteonecrosis, who failed non-operative modalities were treated with joint-preserving surgery at a single center between January 2000 and December 2006. Treatment modalities included arthroscopy, and either percutaneous core decompression and/or osteochondral autograft transfer. Three knees were lost to follow-up, leaving 14 knees with a mean follow-up of 37 months (range, 11 to 84 months).

Results: Twelve of 14 knees (86%) had knee joint survival with a mean Knee Society Score of 80 points (range, 45 to 100 points) at final follow-up. One patient was treated with serial core decompression followed by osteochondral transfer, and was included in both groups. Six of 7 patients (86%) treated with core decompression alone had a successful clinical outcome, as did 7 of 8 patients (87%) treated with osteochondral autograft transfers. Two patients (14%) progressed to condylar collapse, and were treated with total knee arthroplasty with successful results.

Conclusion: Based on these results, we propose a treatment algorithm that begins with non-operative treatment, followed by joint-preserving surgery consisting of arthroscopy, core decompression, and/or osteochondral autograft transfer. Although our sample size is small, the results suggest that this proposed treatment algorithm can successfully postpone the need for knee arthroplasty in selected patients with pre-collapse spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee.

The pathogenesis of aseptic loosening of total joint prostheses is not clearly understood. Two features are associated with loosened prostheses, namely, particulate debris and movement of the implant. While numerous studies have evaluated the cellular response to particulate biomaterials, few have investigated the influence of movement of the implant on the biological response to particles. Our aim was therefore to test the hypothesis that excessive mechanical stimulation of the periprosthetic tissues induces an inflammatory response and that the addition of particulate biomaterials intensifies this.

We allocated 66 adult Beagle dogs to four groups as follows: stable implants with (I) and without (II) particulate polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and moving implants with (III) and without (IV) particulate PMMA. They were then evaluated at 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 weeks.

The stable implants were well tolerated and a thin, fibrous membrane of connective tissue was observed. There was evidence of positive staining in some cells for interleukin-6 (IL-6). Addition of particulate PMMA around the stable implants resulted in an increase in the fibroblastic response and positive staining for IL-6 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). By contrast, movement of the implant resulted in an immediate inflammatory response characterised by large numbers of histiocytes and cytokine staining for IL-1ß, TNF-α and IL-6. Introduction of particulate PMMA aggravated this response. Animals with particulate PMMA and movement of the implant have an intense inflammatory response associated with accelerated bone loss.

Our results indicate that the initiation of the inflammatory response to biomaterial particles was much slower than that to gross mechanical instability. Furthermore, when there was both particulate debris and movement, there was an amplification of the adverse tissue response as evidenced by the presence of osteolysis and increases in the presence of inflammatory cells and their associated cytokines.