Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is the most effective treatment modality for severe arthritis of the hip. Patients report excellent clinical and functional outcomes following THA, including subjective improvement in gait mechanics. However, few studies in the literature have outlined the impact of surgical approach on gait kinetics and kinematics. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of surgical approach for THA on quantitative gait analysis. Thirty patients undergoing THA for primary osteoarthritis of the hip were assigned to one of three surgical approaches (10 anterior, 10 posterior, and 10 lateral). A single surgeon performed each individual approach. Each patient received standardised implants at the time of surgery (cementless stem and acetabular component, cobalt chrome femoral head, highly cross-linked liner). Patients underwent 3D gait analysis pre-operatively, and at 6- and 12-weeks following the procedure. At each time point, temporal gait parameters, kinetics, and kinematics were compared. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance. All three groups were similar with respect to age (p=0.27), body mass index (p=0.16), and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (p=0.66). Temporal parameters including step length, stride length, gait velocity, and percent stance and swing phase were similar between the groups at all time points. The lateral cohort had higher pelvic tilt during stance on the affected leg than the anterior cohort at 6-weeks (p=0.033). Affected leg ipsilateral trunk lean during stance was higher in the lateral group at 6-weeks (p=0.006) and 12-weeks (p=0.037) compared to the other cohorts. The anterior and posterior groups demonstrated an increased external rotation moment at 6-weeks (p=0.001) and 12-weeks (p=0.005) compared to the lateral group. Although temporal parameters were similar across all groups, some differences in gait kinematics and kinetics exist following THA using different surgical approaches. However, the clinical relevance based on the small magnitude of the differences remains in question.
Full-thickness burns around the knee can involve the extensor mechanism. The gastrocnemius flap is well described for soft tissue reconstruction around the knee. We describe a method where a Whichita Fusion Nail¯ knee arthrodesis, combined with a medial gastrocnemius muscle flap was used to salvage the knee and preserve the lower leg following a full-thickness contact burn. The gastrocnemius flap for wound coverage of an open knee joint was originally described in 1970 and remains the workhorse for soft tissue knee reconstruction. There are a number of local alternatives including the vastus lateralis, medialis and sartorius flap; and perforator flaps such as the medial sural artery perforator island flap and islanded posterior calf perforator flap, however many of these are unsuitable for larger defects. Full-thickness burns around the knee can put the extensor mechanism at risk and subsequent rupture is a possible consequence. The gastrocnemius flap has been used to cover a medial knee defect with exposed joint cavity following a burn and also been used in post burn contracture release around the knee. The primary indication for Wichita fusion nail is a failed total knee replacement. It allows intramedullary stabilization with compression at the arthrodesis site to stimulate bone union. With fusion rates reported up to 100% and low complication rates as compared to other methods of fusion, the technique has a useful role in limb salvage type procedures. While use of the gastrocnemius flap in knee burns has been described before we believe this is the first time that this combination of techniques, namely knee arthrodesis with soft tissue reconstruction using a gastrocnemius flap, has been reported. Combining these procedures with a multidisciplinary approach provides a useful alternative leading to limb salvage and avoiding the need for an above knee amputation when extensor reconstruction is not possible.
